Reliability, Concurrent Validity and Minimal Detectable Change of the Step Up and Down Test in Patients With Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT ID: NCT06344182
Last Updated: 2024-04-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
47 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-02-01
2021-05-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Reliability and Validity of the 2-Minute Step Test in Patients With Knee Arthroplasty
NCT05064943
The Dubousset Functional Test in Total Knee Arthloplasty
NCT06634212
Analyzing of the Reliability, Validity and Responsiveness Levels of Performance Tests
NCT05703594
RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE DT BALANCE TEST IN PATIENTS WITH TKA
NCT06108466
Validity And Reliability Of The Short Physical Performance Battery In Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT06201637
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Sample Size The NCSS Trial and PASS 14 software (NCSS, LLC, Kaysville, Utah USA) was used to conduct the sample size. Power of 0.8 and an alpha level of 0.05 were used. Previous research on StUD in patients with knee Osteoarthritis was noted good test-retest reliability (ICC= 0.87) (G. P. L. Almeida et al., 2021). The test-retest reliability of the current study was thus hypothesized to be excellent. Assuming a %10 attrition rate, a null reliability with ICC=0.75 and expected reliability with ICC=0.90, 47 subjects would be needed.
Participant Forty-seven patients with primary TKA who were operated on by the same surgeon using the paramedian approach were contacted by phone and volunteered to participate in this study. Patients with primary TKA who are at least six months post-surgery were included. Patients were selected and invited to the study by the surgeon and physiotherapist.
Statistical Analysis All data were analyzed using the IBM SPSS Statistics (Version 23.0) software. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov/Shapiro-Wilk tests were used for the determination of the normal distribution. The difference between the pain levels before and after the trials was compared using the Paired Samples T test. The level of significance was determined p \< .05. The correlations between the StUD and 30 CST, HSS, PCS12, and MCS12 were calculated to determine convergent validity. The convergent validity was analyzed based on the Spearman's correlation and was interpreted as follows: 0-0.09 = no correlation; 0.1-0.39 = weak correlation; 0.4-0.59 = moderate correlation; 0.7-0.89 = strong correlation; and 0.9-1 = perfect correlation. Paired samples' t test was used for comparing the difference between the first and second trials of StUD test. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2,1) was used assess the test-retest reliability. The ICC values were interpreted as follows: poor, \<0.5; moderate, 0.5-0.75; good, 0.75-0.9; excellent reliability, \>0.9 (Koo \& Li, 2016). The standard error of measurement (SEM) was calculated as SD×√(1-ICC) , where SD is the pooled standard deviation from the first session. Minimal detectable change (MDC) was calculated at a 95% confidence level (MDC95). MDC95 was calculated according to following formula: MDC95=SEM×1.95×√2. All data were analyzed using the IBM SPSS Statistics (Version 23.0) software
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Step Up and Down Test
Step Up and Down Test In the StUD test, the patient completes maximum number of step-up-down repetitions in 15 seconds. Starting from a standing position, the participant took a full step up, leading with the test leg, then the non-testing leg, until both knees were fully extended and both hips were at least in neutral extension. In order to stress the testing limb concentrically and eccentrically, the participant stepped off the step first with the non-testing limb, then the testing limb. The patient was asked to repeat for 15 seconds as quickly as possible. The physical therapist stood to the side of the step for safety and so that he/she could observe the technique and ensure that the participant came to a full step up and down during the test.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients over 40 years of age
Exclusion Criteria
* having had other surgery on a leg with TKA,
* having symptomatic hip OA,
* having a history of knee or hip fracture,
* having a previous orthopedic or neurological disease that prevents stepping
40 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Dokuz Eylul University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sumeyya Tarkan
Pt
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Dokuz Eylul University
Izmir, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Almeida GJ, Schroeder CA, Gil AB, Fitzgerald GK, Piva SR. Interrater reliability and validity of the stair ascend/descend test in subjects with total knee arthroplasty. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Jun;91(6):932-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.02.003.
Almeida GPL, Monteiro IO, Dantas RGO, Tavares MLA, Lima POP. Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Step Up and Down (StUD) test for individuals with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2021 Dec;56:102454. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2021.102454. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
Eymir M, Yuksel E, Unver B, Karatosun V. Reliability, validity, and minimal detectable change of the Step Test in patients with total knee arthroplasty. Ir J Med Sci. 2022 Dec;191(6):2651-2656. doi: 10.1007/s11845-021-02888-6. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
Narin S, Unver B, Bakirhan S, Bozan O, Karatosun V. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) Knee Score. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2014;48(3):241-8. doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2014.3109.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
STarkan
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.