Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
SUSPENDED
NA
35 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2026-10-31
2028-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The study hypothesizes that Self-Distancing will lead to greater increases in approach behaviors and a larger decrease in symptom severity compared to a control condition (first-person self-talk).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Computer - Based Treatment for Social Anxiety Disorder
NCT04663724
Group Exposure Workshops for Socially Anxious Undergraduates
NCT06673407
A Pilot Study of Fear Extinction Learning in Anxious Youth
NCT03032926
iExposure Intervention for Social Anxiety
NCT06409247
Attention Disengagement Training for Social Phobia
NCT00684320
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Self-distancing (SD) is a technique that may help youths approach their fears in exposure therapy. SD utilizes second or third-person language to enhance a person's psychological distance from self, helping them to "take a step back" from emotional situations and adopt a more objective perspective. In community samples, SD has been found to boost determination and persistence during difficult tasks, including those that induce anxiety (e.g., giving a speech). However, SD has yet to be tested as a strategy for helping clinically anxious youth engage with exposures. Additionally, objective measures of approach are needed for measuring and modifying novel exposure therapy augmentation strategies, such as SD, to improve treatment outcomes.
This study will examine if SD increases the ability to approach feared stimuli during a behavioral approach test (BAT). 20 youth (7-12.99 years) with specific phobia of spiders will be randomized to either a SD or a control condition. In the SD condition, participants will engage with the exposure task (BAT) from a self-distanced view (e.g., "Emily will touch a spider"), while in the control condition the subject will use first-person perspective (e.g., "I will touch a spider") Before and after the exposure therapy session, a BAT will be applied. This study will assess: 1) Approach -indexed using both behavioral (ability to get physically closer to spider, and video-derived motion analysis) and neuro-physiological (i.e., electroencephalogram \[EEG\], heart rate \[HR\], heart rate variability \[HRV\] and electrodermal activity \[EDA\]) metrics, collected during a BAT and 2) severity of specific phobia using validated self-report scales. During SD or control intervention, continuous audio and video data will be collected to derive behavioral metrics of engagement with the intervention (i.e., video-derived motion analysis and audio-derived linguistic metrics) and participants will be asked to subjectively rate their distress and engagement with the activity. Data will be analyzed to determine whether SD improves behavioral, neural, and physiological markers of approach to feared stimuli in youth with specific phobia and reduces symptom severity, and to explore the degree to which changes in video and audio-derived objective metrics of behavioral engagement with the intervention associate with changes in subjective ratings of fear/distress, subjective self-report of engagement and symptom severity.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Self-Distancing
Youth will be randomized to a BAT with Self-Distancing Intervention. In this arm, participants will be instructed to describe the exposure task from a self-distanced perspective (e.g., "Emily is going to touch the spider").
Self-Distancing Intervention
In the Self Distancing Intervention condition, participants will be instructed to describe the exposure task from a self-distanced perspective (e.g., "Emily is going to touch the spider").
First-person self-talk
Youth will be randomized to a BAT with a control condition. In this arm, participants will be instructed to describe the exposure task from a self-immersed perspective (e.g.,"I'm going to touch the spider")
First-person self-talk
Youth will be randomized to a BAT with a control condition. In this arm, participants will be instructed to describe the exposure task from a self-immersed perspective (e.g., "I'm going to touch the spider")
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Self-Distancing Intervention
In the Self Distancing Intervention condition, participants will be instructed to describe the exposure task from a self-distanced perspective (e.g., "Emily is going to touch the spider").
First-person self-talk
Youth will be randomized to a BAT with a control condition. In this arm, participants will be instructed to describe the exposure task from a self-immersed perspective (e.g., "I'm going to touch the spider")
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Written informed consent by a parent/legal guardian and assent by the child
* Clinically significant symptoms of specific phobia (i.e., spider phobia)
* Fluent in English (Participant may be bilingual but must be able to speak and understand fluent English to participate in the study)
Exclusion Criteria
* Prior diagnosis of psychotic disorders
* Prior diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder
* Active alcohol or substance dependence
* Active suicidal ideation or suicidal behavior within the past 3 months prior to baseline assessment
* Any major medical or neurological problem (e.g., unstable hypertension, seizure disorder, head trauma)
* Any history of cognitive impairment or developmental delay
7 Years
12 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Columbia University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Kate D. Fitzgerald, MD
Professor of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kate D Fitzgerald, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Professor of Psychiatry
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center
New York, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Wolitzky-Taylor KB, Horowitz JD, Powers MB, Telch MJ. Psychological approaches in the treatment of specific phobias: a meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2008 Jul;28(6):1021-37. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2008.02.007. Epub 2008 Mar 7.
Wetzer G, Ten Have M, de Graaf R, Batelaan NM, van Balkom AJLM. Specific Phobia: Risk Factor of Other Psychiatric Disorders. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2021 Jul 1;209(7):484-490. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000001341.
Ollendick, T.H. and N.J. King, Empirically Supported Treatments for Children and Adolescents: Advances Toward Evidence-Based Practice, in Handbook of Interventions that Work with Children and Adolescents. 2004. p. 1-25.
Ollendick T, Allen B, Benoit K, Cowart M. The tripartite model of fear in children with specific phobias: assessing concordance and discordance using the behavioral approach test. Behav Res Ther. 2011 Aug;49(8):459-65. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2011.04.003. Epub 2011 May 6.
Merikangas KR, He JP, Burstein M, Swanson SA, Avenevoli S, Cui L, Benjet C, Georgiades K, Swendsen J. Lifetime prevalence of mental disorders in U.S. adolescents: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication--Adolescent Supplement (NCS-A). J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2010 Oct;49(10):980-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2010.05.017. Epub 2010 Jul 31.
Bushnell GA, Gaynes BN, Compton SN, Dusetzina SB, Olfson M, Sturmer T. Incident Substance Use Disorder Following Anxiety Disorder in Privately Insured Youth. J Adolesc Health. 2019 Oct;65(4):536-542. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.05.007. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
Borkovec, T., T. Weerts, and D. Bernstein, Assessment of anxiety in handbook of behavioral assessment. 1997, New York, John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
Barzilay R, White LK, Moore TM, Calkins ME, Taylor JH, Patrick A, Huque ZM, Young JF, Ruparel K, Pine DS, Gur RC, Gur RE. Association of anxiety phenotypes with risk of depression and suicidal ideation in community youth. Depress Anxiety. 2020 Sep;37(9):851-861. doi: 10.1002/da.23060. Epub 2020 Jun 5.
Ahlen J, Ghaderi A. Dimension-specific symptom patterns in trajectories of broad anxiety: A longitudinal prospective study in school-aged children. Dev Psychopathol. 2020 Feb;32(1):31-41. doi: 10.1017/S0954579418001384.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AAAU7985
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.