Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) for the Treatment of Obesity
NCT ID: NCT06339320
Last Updated: 2024-04-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
150 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-02-28
2033-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of the EndoZip System and Apollo ESG in Obese Patients
NCT07090005
Multicenter Endoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (ESG) Trial (MERIT Trial)
NCT03406975
EFFICACY OF THE SLEEVE GASTROPLASTY WITH THE ENDOSCOPIC SYSTEM OVERSTICH SX ON WEIGHT LOSS AND REDUCTION OF CO-MORBIDITY FOR OBESE PATIENTS
NCT05072067
ABLATE WEIGHT (Ablation Plus ESG for Weight Loss)
NCT05578703
Benefits of Endoscopic Bariatric Procedures
NCT05514288
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Helping to bridge this gap in available treatments, the endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) procedure provides a way to improve access to validated, efficacious, and safe anti-obesity treatments. ESG is an endoscopic weight loss procedure. The procedure uses an endoscopic suturing device, which has received FDA authorization as a minimally invasive procedure to facilitate weight loss for adults with obesity (BMI 30-50 kg/m2) who have been unable to lose weight or maintain weight loss through more conservative measures such as diet and exercise. This procedure involves endoscopic suturing to reduce the volume of the stomach endoscopically by approximately 70% to 80% its original size. Following the procedure, the new stomach appears similar to the surgical sleeve stomach, although the procedure is considered less invasive with fewer complications compared to a surgical sleeve procedure.
This study aims to perform ESG for patients with obesity, defined as a BMI 30-50 kg/m2. Additionally, data collection of relevant weight-related and metabolic outcomes, including comorbidity resolution will be collected retrospectively from the study to assess efficacy and safety of the ESG procedure. Data collection for the MBSAQIP registry will be recorded on a monthly basis.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ESG Procedure
Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty for patients with obesity using the Apollo OverStitch endoscopic suturing device.
Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG)
The ESG procedure uses the Apollo OverStitch endoscopic suturing device, which has received FDA authorization as a minimally invasive procedure to facilitate weight loss for adults with who have been unable to lose weight or maintain weight loss through more conservative measures such as diet and exercise. This procedure involves endoscopic suturing to reduce the volume of the stomach endoscopically by approximately 70% to 80% its original size. Using the Apollo OverStitch or APOLLO ESG and ESG SX Systems, the ESG procedure is performed be folding the stomach in on itself (endoscopically) and placing full-thickness sutures through the wall of the stomach to maintain this narrow, smaller size. Following the procedure, the new stomach appears similar to the surgical sleeve stomach, although the procedure is considered less invasive with fewer complications compared to a surgical sleeve gastrectomy.
Apollo OverStitch endoscopic suturing device
Apollo ESG is the first and only device to be authorized by the FDA to perform the ESG procedure to facilitate weight loss in patients with obesity (BMI 30 to 50 kg/m2). The FDA identifies this generic type of device as an Endoscopic suturing device for altering gastric anatomy for weight loss.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG)
The ESG procedure uses the Apollo OverStitch endoscopic suturing device, which has received FDA authorization as a minimally invasive procedure to facilitate weight loss for adults with who have been unable to lose weight or maintain weight loss through more conservative measures such as diet and exercise. This procedure involves endoscopic suturing to reduce the volume of the stomach endoscopically by approximately 70% to 80% its original size. Using the Apollo OverStitch or APOLLO ESG and ESG SX Systems, the ESG procedure is performed be folding the stomach in on itself (endoscopically) and placing full-thickness sutures through the wall of the stomach to maintain this narrow, smaller size. Following the procedure, the new stomach appears similar to the surgical sleeve stomach, although the procedure is considered less invasive with fewer complications compared to a surgical sleeve gastrectomy.
Apollo OverStitch endoscopic suturing device
Apollo ESG is the first and only device to be authorized by the FDA to perform the ESG procedure to facilitate weight loss in patients with obesity (BMI 30 to 50 kg/m2). The FDA identifies this generic type of device as an Endoscopic suturing device for altering gastric anatomy for weight loss.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients that have been unable able to lose weight, or maintain weight loss, through more conservative measures (i.e., lifestyle interventions including diet and exercise) per the FDA approval for the Apollo ESG device. Lifestyle interventions may include traditional diet and anaerobic or aerobic exercise, including resistance training.
Exclusion Criteria
* Active tobacco use (defined as tobacco within 4 weeks prior to the procedure)
* Active gastric mucosal lesions
* Active bleeding or potential bleeding gastric lesions (i.e., ulcers, erosive gastritis, varices, or vascular malformations)
* Neoplastic lesions (i.e., esophageal, gastric, or small bowel cancer)
* Hiatal hernia \>5 cm
* Severe coagulopathy and antiplatelet/anticoagulant therapy that cannot be corrected
* Psychiatric disorders not assessed or cleared by a psychologist or psychiatrist actively participating in that patient's care (i.e., affective disorders not under medical supervision or refractory to medical therapy and all eating disorders such as anorexia nervosa, binge eating disorder, specified feeding and eating disorders, avoidant restrictive food intake, and rumination)
* Patients with endoscopic interventions that are contraindicated
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The Methodist Hospital Research Institute
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Thomas R McCarty, MD, MPH
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Thomas R McCarty, MD, MPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The Methodist Hospital Research Institute
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Houston Methodist Hospital
Houston, Texas, United States
Houston Methodist Hospital - Sugarland
Sugar Land, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Abu Dayyeh BK, Bazerbachi F, Vargas EJ, Sharaiha RZ, Thompson CC, Thaemert BC, Teixeira AF, Chapman CG, Kumbhari V, Ujiki MB, Ahrens J, Day C; MERIT Study Group; Galvao Neto M, Zundel N, Wilson EB. Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty for treatment of class 1 and 2 obesity (MERIT): a prospective, multicentre, randomised trial. Lancet. 2022 Aug 6;400(10350):441-451. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01280-6. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
Sharaiha RZ, Kumta NA, Saumoy M, Desai AP, Sarkisian AM, Benevenuto A, Tyberg A, Kumar R, Igel L, Verna EC, Schwartz R, Frissora C, Shukla A, Aronne LJ, Kahaleh M. Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty Significantly Reduces Body Mass Index and Metabolic Complications in Obese Patients. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Apr;15(4):504-510. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.12.012. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
Alqahtani A, Al-Darwish A, Mahmoud AE, Alqahtani YA, Elahmedi M. Short-term outcomes of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty in 1000 consecutive patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Jun;89(6):1132-1138. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.12.012. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
Singh S, Hourneaux de Moura DT, Khan A, Bilal M, Ryan MB, Thompson CC. Safety and efficacy of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty worldwide for treatment of obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020 Feb;16(2):340-351. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.11.012. Epub 2019 Dec 10.
Novikov AA, Afaneh C, Saumoy M, Parra V, Shukla A, Dakin GF, Pomp A, Dawod E, Shah S, Aronne LJ, Sharaiha RZ. Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty, Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy, and Laparoscopic Band for Weight Loss: How Do They Compare? J Gastrointest Surg. 2018 Feb;22(2):267-273. doi: 10.1007/s11605-017-3615-7. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
Alqahtani AR, Elahmedi M, Aldarwish A, Abdurabu HY, Alqahtani S. Endoscopic gastroplasty versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a noninferiority propensity score-matched comparative study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Jul;96(1):44-50. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.02.050. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PRO00037835
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.