Digital Confocal Microscopy for Real-time Diagnosis of Pancreatic Solid Lesion

NCT ID: NCT06315439

Last Updated: 2024-03-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

78 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-01-01

Study Completion Date

2023-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided (EUS) tissue acquisition is the current standard of care for the diagnosis of pancreatic solid lesions but it is burdened by a non-negligible risk of non-diagnostic or inconclusive results.

Ex-vivo fluorescence confocal laser microscopy (FCM) with MAVIG VivaScope® 2500M-G4 could allow real time assessment of adequacy and diagnosis of the sample.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided (EUS) tissue acquisition is the current standard of care for the diagnosis of pancreatic solid lesions.

However, EUS-sampling is burdened by a non-negligible risk of non-diagnostic or inconclusive results, with an estimated negative predictive value not higher than 70-80%.

ROSE could improve the diagnostic yeld of this procedure. Data about the utility of rapid on-site evalutation (ROSE) are still controversial. Without ROSE, current guidelines suggest performance of three to four needle passes with an fine needle aspiration (FNA) needle or two to three passes with a fine needle biopsy (FNB) needle.

Potential drawbacks of ROSE are the considerable time commitment, costs and logistical and personnel issues that arise because of the "on demand" nature of these procedures with the need to have available technologists.

Ex-vivo fluorescence confocal laser microscopy (FCM) is an optical technology for rapid microscopic digital imaging of fresh unfixed biological specimens without any slide preparation.

FCM involves no damage or cell/tissue loss during the examination and the sample can subsequently be recovered and formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) for permanent histology. FCM allows both cellular and architectural details to be visualized, similar to standard histological analysis of paraffin-embedded or frozen samples. With FCM, multimodal confocal microscopy using different laser sources and fusion images can generate optical plans similar to those from hematoxylin/eosin (H\&E)- stained sections directly from native tissues.

Recently, the feasibility of FCM with MAVIG VivaScope® 2500M-G4 in EUS-FNB sample of pancreatic solid lesions has been investigated . This previous single-center study demonstrated good concordance between the FCM image-based evaluation and the final FFPE histology.

However in this first study, a single type of FNB needle was used for all the procedures and the pathologist involved was expert in digital pathology and in pancreatic disease. Therefore it might be not representative of the everyday clinical practice. In addition the first study was mainly focused on the adequacy assessment of the samples.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pancreas Adenocarcinoma Endoscopic Ultrasound Digital Pathology

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

pancreatic solid lesions

Endoscopic ultrasound fine needle biopsy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

EUS FNA/B for solid pancreatic lesions. After the FNA/FNB, the needle was removed from the EUS endoscope and the specimen obtained after the first needle pass was expelled and placed directly in a dedicated scaffold (Cytomatrix, UCS Diagnostics).

a drop of ethanol was put on it and the liquid was drained away thanks to the porous structure of the matrix. This step was followed by the deposition of a drop of acridine-orange for 20" and a rapid washing with buffered saline. After that, the Cytomatrix was put on a dedicated microscopic slide and covered with a second slide before the introduction in the slot of the machine.

The FCM VivaScope® 2500 (2500M-G4; VivaScope, Munich, Germany) was used for immediate imaging.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Endoscopic ultrasound fine needle biopsy

EUS FNA/B for solid pancreatic lesions. After the FNA/FNB, the needle was removed from the EUS endoscope and the specimen obtained after the first needle pass was expelled and placed directly in a dedicated scaffold (Cytomatrix, UCS Diagnostics).

a drop of ethanol was put on it and the liquid was drained away thanks to the porous structure of the matrix. This step was followed by the deposition of a drop of acridine-orange for 20" and a rapid washing with buffered saline. After that, the Cytomatrix was put on a dedicated microscopic slide and covered with a second slide before the introduction in the slot of the machine.

The FCM VivaScope® 2500 (2500M-G4; VivaScope, Munich, Germany) was used for immediate imaging.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* pancreatic solid lesions

Exclusion Criteria

* cystic lesions
* not suitable acoustic window for needle biopsy
* decline to give informed consent.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Campus Bio-Medico University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Francesco Maria Di Matteo

Head of Operative Digestive Endoscopy department

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Fondazione Policlinico Campus Bio Medico

Rome, ROMA, Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Itoi T, Sofuni A, Itokawa F, Irisawa A, Khor CJ, Rerknimitr R. Current status of diagnostic endoscopic ultrasonography in the evaluation of pancreatic mass lesions. Dig Endosc. 2011 May;23 Suppl 1:17-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2011.01132.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21535194 (View on PubMed)

Polkowski M, Jenssen C, Kaye P, Carrara S, Deprez P, Gines A, Fernandez-Esparrach G, Eisendrath P, Aithal GP, Arcidiacono P, Barthet M, Bastos P, Fornelli A, Napoleon B, Iglesias-Garcia J, Seicean A, Larghi A, Hassan C, van Hooft JE, Dumonceau JM. Technical aspects of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Guideline - March 2017. Endoscopy. 2017 Oct;49(10):989-1006. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-119219. Epub 2017 Sep 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28898917 (View on PubMed)

Facciorusso A, Wani S, Triantafyllou K, Tziatzios G, Cannizzaro R, Muscatiello N, Singh S. Comparative accuracy of needle sizes and designs for EUS tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Dec;90(6):893-903.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.07.009. Epub 2019 Jul 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31310744 (View on PubMed)

Gkolfakis P, Crino SF, Tziatzios G, Ramai D, Papaefthymiou A, Papanikolaou IS, Triantafyllou K, Arvanitakis M, Lisotti A, Fusaroli P, Mangiavillano B, Carrara S, Repici A, Hassan C, Facciorusso A. Comparative diagnostic performance of end-cutting fine-needle biopsy needles for EUS tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Jun;95(6):1067-1077.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.01.019. Epub 2022 Feb 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35124072 (View on PubMed)

Stigliano S, Crescenzi A, Taffon C, Covotta F, Hassan C, Antonelli G, Verri M, Biasutto D, Scarpa RM, Di Matteo FM. Role of fluorescence confocal microscopy for rapid evaluation of EUS fine-needle biopsy sampling in pancreatic solid lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Sep;94(3):562-568.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.03.029. Epub 2021 Mar 31.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33798539 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Multi-RELAMI

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.