Application of FDG Combined With FAPI PET Dual Imaging in the Diagnosis and Staging of Oropharyngeal and Laryngeal Cancer
NCT ID: NCT06304155
Last Updated: 2024-03-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
40 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-01-01
2026-01-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Therapeutic Efficacy of 18F-FDG Combined With 18F-FAPI PET/MR in Neoadjuvant Therapy for Gastric Cancer
NCT06327386
Head-to-head Comparison of Positron Nuclide Radio-labeled FAPI and 18F-FDG PET/CT in Patients With Malignant Tumors
NCT06182644
Clinical Study of Trap (FAPI) 3 PET Imaging in Noninvasive Diagnosis of Malignant Tumors
NCT07128277
Application of FAPI and FDG PET Imaging in Patients With Different Types of Cancer
NCT06284070
Clinical Application of Fibroblast Activation Protein PET/MRI for Diagnosis and Staging in Malignant Tumors
NCT04554719
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. Patients: The subjects we selected are adults who are not restricted by gender. For details, please refer to the "Eligibility Criteria" column.
2. Clinical data collection: Record the course of disease, CT examination, MR examination, laryngoscopy examination, PET/CT examination, PET/MR examination, and other information of all patients.
3. CT or MRI image analysis: Record the location and number of lesions, measure the long diameter of the primary and metastatic lesions, and the short diameter of lymph nodes on CT or MRI images.
4. PET image analysis: Record and evaluate the following indicators:
the maximum, mean and peak standardized uptakevalue (SUVmax, SUVmean and SUVpeak), Metabolic lesion volume (MLV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG).
5. Statistical analysis: Use descriptive statistical methods to compare the age of patients and the standardized uptake values of FDG and FAPI. Normal distribution data is represented as mean ± standard deviation, while non normal distribution data is represented as median with IQR. Compare the normal distribution data between two groups using paired two sample t-test, and compare the non normal distribution data between two groups using McNemar test. Using a four grid table McNemar χ Compare the diagnostic efficacy of 18F-FDG PET and 18F-FAPI PET through 2 tests, calculate and compare the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of 18F-FDG and 18F-FAPI PET. Due to the potential impact of tumor type on diagnosis, subgroup analysis was conducted on the diagnostic efficacy of 18F-FDG PET and 18F-FAPI PET. Due to the possibility of multiple metastatic lesions in a given participant, the diagnostic results may be correlated within the participant. Therefore, sensitivity analysis of metastatic lesions is also performed based on a generalized linear mixed effects model by combining this correlation between different lesions within the same participant. Double tailed P\<0.05 indicates a statistically significant difference.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Diagnostic efficacy,SUV
The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy of 18F-FDG and 18F-FAPI PET were calculated and compared to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy.
Standardized uptake value (SUV) of 18F-FDG and 18F-FAPI for each target lesion of subject or suspected primary tumor or/and metastasis.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Recently diagnosed patients: patients who have recently been diagnosed with oropharyngeal cancer and laryngeal cancer, have not undergone surgical resection but are willing to undergo surgery;
3. Patients who have been diagnosed with oropharyngeal and laryngeal cancer and have undergone concurrent radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or immunotherapy, and are preparing to undergo preoperative staging in the near future;
4. Patients with high suspicion of oropharyngeal and laryngeal cancer through imaging examination, and later confirmed by pathology as non oropharyngeal or laryngeal cancer;
5. Patient age ≥ 18 years old;
6. The patient voluntarily participates and signs an informed consent form.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients highly suspected of lymphoma or metastasis in clinical or imaging studies;
3. Patients with multiple neck metastases identified through imaging examination that cannot be surgically treated;
4. Patients with malignant tumors in other parts of the body found through imaging examination that cannot be operated on;
5. Pregnancy or lactation period;
6. The imaging quality is poor and cannot be used for diagnosis and evaluation;
7. Patients with contraindications for MR examination.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Xiao Chen
Director of Nuclear Medicine Department
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Daping Hospital of Army Medical University
Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Steuer CE, El-Deiry M, Parks JR, Higgins KA, Saba NF. An update on larynx cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Jan;67(1):31-50. doi: 10.3322/caac.21386. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
Xia R, Wang X, Cheng J, Li X, Sun J, Zeng Q, Hu D, You J, Xiong Y, Chen X. Head-to-head comparison of [18F]FAPI-42 and [18F]FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2025 Jul;52(9):3101-3113. doi: 10.1007/s00259-025-07180-8. Epub 2025 Mar 8.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
An Update on Larynx Cancer
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
202437
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.