Penicillin Allergy Delabeling After a One-Dose Versus Two-Dose Graded Direct Oral Challenge
NCT ID: NCT06303128
Last Updated: 2025-05-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
PHASE3
380 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-02-03
2026-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
\- In penicillin-allergic patients that are at low risk of having an allergic reaction, is a one-dose oral challenge with amoxicillin (a penicillin-based antibiotic) as safe and effective as a two-dose oral challenge?
Participants will, after being identified as having a low-risk penicillin allergy, be administered oral amoxicillin in a controlled setting and then monitored for an allergic reaction. Researchers will compare participants that took one dose of amoxicillin to participants that took two doses of amoxicillin (a small dose and then a larger dose) to see if either group was more likely to develop an allergic reaction.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Safety and Efficacy of an Oral Penicillin Challenge in Low Risk Hospitalized Patients
NCT04408508
Oral Penicillin Challenge and Allergy De-labeling in Children
NCT05563610
Primary Care Amoxicillin Challenge
NCT05165212
Amoxicillin Challenge for Penicillin Allergy Diagnosis
NCT03757052
A Phase 1 Safety and PK Study of IV TP-271
NCT03234738
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Penicillin allergy delabeling is a practice commonly performed by allergists to test patients for safe removal of penicillin allergy from their medical records. The protocol of penicillin allergy delabeling has historically consisted of a skin test, followed by a two-step graded direct oral challenge, in which patients are given a smaller, then larger, oral dose of amoxicillin, a penicillin-containing medication. The patient is monitored closely throughout the process for reaction to penicillin and, if necessary, treatment is given for management of reaction symptoms. This method, though functional, takes time and resources to delabel patients.
As our understanding of penicillin drug allergy evolves, it may be possible to reduce the number of steps (and therefore resources) necessary to safely remove penicillin allergy labels. New data suggests that skin testing may not be a necessary step in penicillin allergy delabeling in a subset of low-risk patients. It has also been demonstrated in several studies that a single-dose direct oral challenge (rather than a two-step graded dose) is safe. A recent pilot study also showed that penicillin allergy delabeling can be safely performed in a primary care setting without the direct supervision of an allergist.
Per the authors' literature review, no prospective studies have directly compared the safety and efficacy of a single-dose versus a two-dose graded direct oral challenge. We propose a non-inferiority study in which patients classified as having a low-risk penicillin allergy are randomized into two groups and then receive either a single-dose or the traditional two-dose graded direct oral challenge to be able to evaluate these two treatment protocols in a side-by-side fashion. The results will contribute to our understanding of if a single-dose direct oral challenge can be safely used in place of the traditional two-dose graded direct oral challenge, thus reducing barriers for implementation in a primary care setting.
Patients with penicillin allergy that express interest through publicly posted recruitment materials will be screened to determine if they meet criteria for a "low-risk" allergy through the PEN-FAST screening tool, a recently developed, externally validated penicillin allergy risk assessment calculator. Those that meet the low-risk criteria and other eligibility criteria will be scheduled for an outpatient delabeling appointment. Participants will be randomly assigned in a double-blinded manner to receive either a two-dose graded direct oral challenge (DOC) with amoxicillin or a one-dose DOC placebo, followed by amoxicillin. Each group will receive the same cumulative dose of amoxicillin by the end of the challenge. Participants assigned to the two-dose graded DOC will be administered 62.5mg amoxicillin (25% of the full dose), followed by 187.5mg amoxicillin. Patients assigned to the one-dose DOC will be administered a placebo (Syrpalta or similar, a syrup used in drug compounding), followed by 250mg amoxicillin.
Doses will be given 30 minutes apart from one another. Both groups will be observed for a minimum of 1 hour after administration of the final dose of amoxicillin. Vital signs will be taken immediately before starting the trial, 30 minutes after administration of the first dose, and 60 minutes after administration of the second dose. If patients develop a reaction at any point in the trial, they will be treated according to the type and severity of their symptoms in an appropriate and standardized manner.
As both single-dose and graded two-dose challenges have been used in clinical practice to remove penicillin allergy labels in the past, if no reaction occurs, patients can have their penicillin allergy removed from their chart. Patients will be contacted around 5 days after the challenge to evaluate for any delayed reactions. If, at the 5-day phone call, patients have not had any other reactions suspected to be related to amoxicillin, their penicillin allergy label will be removed at that time. Patients will also be contacted around 6 months after the DOC to evaluate for any reactions to antibiotics received since successful delabeling. The two groups will then be compared to determine if the one-dose challenge is noninferior to the standard graded two-dose challenge (based upon the rate of successful delabeling without adverse reactions).
Currently, this study is approved as a single-site study only.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
One-dose group
Patients assigned to this group will receive a liquid placebo followed by full-dose liquid amoxicillin 250mg PO thirty minutes later.
Amoxicillin 250 MG
Liquid amoxicillin 250mg PO
Placebo
Given prior to amoxicillin 250mg in one-dose group
Graded, two-dose group
Patients assigned to this group will receive liquid amoxicillin (25% of 250mg dose), followed by liquid amoxicillin 187.5mg PO (75% of 250mg dose) thirty minutes later.
Amoxicillin 62.5mg
Given first in two-dose group, liquid amoxicillin 62.5mg PO
Amoxicillin 187.5mg
Given second in two-dose group, liquid amoxicillin 187.5mg PO
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Amoxicillin 250 MG
Liquid amoxicillin 250mg PO
Placebo
Given prior to amoxicillin 250mg in one-dose group
Amoxicillin 62.5mg
Given first in two-dose group, liquid amoxicillin 62.5mg PO
Amoxicillin 187.5mg
Given second in two-dose group, liquid amoxicillin 187.5mg PO
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Reports an allergy to one of the following medications: penicillin VK, penicillin G, amoxicillin, ampicillin, dicloxacillin, flucloxacillin, nafcillin, oxacillin, amoxicillin- clavulanate, ampicillin-sulbactam. Subjects with an unspecified penicillin allergy are also eligible to participate.
Exclusion Criteria
* History of acute kidney injury (acute interstitial nephritis), severe liver impairment (drug- induced liver injury), serum sickness, or isolated drug fever attributed to a penicillin- based antibiotic
* Anaphylaxis for any reason in the last year
* Cognitive impairment where a collateral history could not be obtained and/or patient does not have capacity to consent for themselves
* Pregnant (self-reported)
* Any illness or condition that would increase the risk of participation in the study, per the evaluating clinician's judgment
* Active treatment of or history of acute angle closure glaucoma
* On H1- or H2-blockers (i.e. diphenhydramine, hydroxyzine, chlorpheniramine, cetirizine, levocetirizine, loratadine, fexofenadine or famotidine, ranitidine, cimetidine, nizatidine, respectively) within 72 hours of initiating direct oral challenge (will be counseled to discontinue prior to testing)
* Actively receiving greater than stress dose steroid (hydrocortisone \>50mg four times a day or steroid equivalent)
* Actively receiving any antibiotic
* Relative contraindication: Patients on beta blockers and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE inhibitors) will have an open dialog with the study team regarding the risks and benefits of testing a low-risk penicillin allergy patient. A joint decision will be made based on the patient's preference and the physician's comfort level.
18 Years
89 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
OTHER
James Tarbox, MD
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
James Tarbox, MD
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
James A Tarbox, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
Lubbock, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Blumenthal KG, Peter JG, Trubiano JA, Phillips EJ. Antibiotic allergy. Lancet. 2019 Jan 12;393(10167):183-198. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32218-9. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
Trubiano JA, Vogrin S, Chua KYL, Bourke J, Yun J, Douglas A, Stone CA, Yu R, Groenendijk L, Holmes NE, Phillips EJ. Development and Validation of a Penicillin Allergy Clinical Decision Rule. JAMA Intern Med. 2020 May 1;180(5):745-752. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0403.
Khan DA, Banerji A, Blumenthal KG, Phillips EJ, Solensky R, White AA, Bernstein JA, Chu DK, Ellis AK, Golden DBK, Greenhawt MJ, Horner CC, Ledford D, Lieberman JA, Oppenheimer J, Rank MA, Shaker MS, Stukus DR, Wallace D, Wang J; Chief Editor(s):; Khan DA, Golden DBK, Shaker M, Stukus DR; Workgroup Contributors:; Khan DA, Banerji A, Blumenthal KG, Phillips EJ, Solensky R, White AA; Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters Reviewers:; Bernstein JA, Chu DK, Ellis AK, Golden DBK, Greenhawt MJ, Horner CC, Ledford D, Lieberman JA, Oppenheimer J, Rank MA, Shaker MS, Stukus DR, Wallace D, Wang J. Drug allergy: A 2022 practice parameter update. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022 Dec;150(6):1333-1393. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2022.08.028. Epub 2022 Sep 17. No abstract available.
Iammatteo M, Lezmi G, Confino-Cohen R, Tucker M, Ben-Shoshan M, Caubet JC. Direct Challenges for the Evaluation of Beta-Lactam Allergy: Evidence and Conditions for Not Performing Skin Testing. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 Aug;9(8):2947-2956. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.04.073.
Iammatteo M, Alvarez Arango S, Ferastraoaru D, Akbar N, Lee AY, Cohen HW, Jerschow E. Safety and Outcomes of Oral Graded Challenges to Amoxicillin without Prior Skin Testing. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019 Jan;7(1):236-243. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2018.05.008. Epub 2018 May 23.
Copaescu AM, Vogrin S, James F, Chua KYL, Rose MT, De Luca J, Waldron J, Awad A, Godsell J, Mitri E, Lambros B, Douglas A, Youcef Khoudja R, Isabwe GAC, Genest G, Fein M, Radojicic C, Collier A, Lugar P, Stone C, Ben-Shoshan M, Turner NA, Holmes NE, Phillips EJ, Trubiano JA. Efficacy of a Clinical Decision Rule to Enable Direct Oral Challenge in Patients With Low-Risk Penicillin Allergy: The PALACE Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2023 Sep 1;183(9):944-952. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.2986.
Wang LA, Patel K, Kuruvilla ME, Shih J. Direct amoxicillin challenge without preliminary skin testing for pediatric patients with penicillin allergy labels. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2020 Aug;125(2):226-228. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2020.05.004. Epub 2020 May 11. No abstract available.
Lin L, Nagtegaal JE, Buijtels PCAM, Jong E. Antimicrobial stewardship intervention: optimizing antibiotic treatment in hospitalized patients with reported antibiotic allergy. J Hosp Infect. 2020 Feb;104(2):137-143. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2019.10.007. Epub 2019 Oct 13.
Trubiano JA, Smibert O, Douglas A, Devchand M, Lambros B, Holmes NE, Chua KY, Phillips EJ, Slavin MA. The Safety and Efficacy of an Oral Penicillin Challenge Program in Cancer Patients: A Multicenter Pilot Study. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2018 Nov 17;5(12):ofy306. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofy306. eCollection 2018 Dec.
Chua KYL, Vogrin S, Bury S, Douglas A, Holmes NE, Tan N, Brusco NK, Hall R, Lambros B, Lean J, Stevenson W, Devchand M, Garrett K, Thursky K, Grayson ML, Slavin MA, Phillips EJ, Trubiano JA. The Penicillin Allergy Delabeling Program: A Multicenter Whole-of-Hospital Health Services Intervention and Comparative Effectiveness Study. Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Aug 2;73(3):487-496. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa653.
Tucker MH, Lomas CM, Ramchandar N, Waldram JD. Amoxicillin challenge without penicillin skin testing in evaluation of penicillin allergy in a cohort of Marine recruits. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017 May-Jun;5(3):813-815. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.01.023. Epub 2017 Mar 21. No abstract available.
Kuruvilla M, Shih J, Patel K, Scanlon N. Direct oral amoxicillin challenge without preliminary skin testing in adult patients with allergy and at low risk with reported penicillin allergy. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2019 Jan 1;40(1):57-61. doi: 10.2500/aap.2019.40.4184.
Chow TG, Patel G, Mohammed M, Johnson D, Khan DA. Delabeling penicillin allergy in a pediatric primary care clinic. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2023 May;130(5):667-669. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2023.01.034. Epub 2023 Feb 2. No abstract available.
Livirya S, Pithie A, Chua I, Hamilton N, Doogue M, Isenman H. Oral amoxicillin challenge for low-risk penicillin allergic patients. Intern Med J. 2022 Feb;52(2):295-300. doi: 10.1111/imj.14978. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Recruiting Website
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB-FY2024-61
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.