Comparison of Standard Cystoscopy With Carbon Dioxide Cystoscopy

NCT ID: NCT06278753

Last Updated: 2025-02-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

540 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-07-01

Study Completion Date

2024-04-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

For the evaluation of the lower urinary tract after laparoscopic hysterectomy, routine standard saline cystoscopy and carbon dioxide cystoscopy will be compared.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

It was aimed to investigate whether routine cystoscopy with carbon dioxide is a safer and faster method for the evaluation of lower urinary tract injuries compared to standard saline cystoscopy. In addition, with this study, it will be studied whether bladder bleeding or intra-bladder masses can be evaluated more quickly and clearly.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Bladder Injury Ureter Injury Surgical Injury Complication of Surgical Procedure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Standard cystoscopy

Standard cystoscopy arm

No interventions assigned to this group

carbon dioxide cystoscopy

carbon dioxide cystoscopy arm

carbon dioxide cystoscopy

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Using carbon dioxide medium for filling bladder

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

carbon dioxide cystoscopy

Using carbon dioxide medium for filling bladder

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign reasons planned patients
2. The operation will be performed in our hospital
3. Reporting preoperative endometrial and cervical samplings as benign
4. After discharge, control examinations will be carried out in our hospital.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Abdominal, robotic or vaginal hysterectomies
2. malignant reporting of preoperative cervical and endometrial samplings
3. Patients do not want to participate in the study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Tepecik Training and Research Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Abdurrahman Hamdi İnan

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Tepecik Training and Research Hospital

Izmir, Eurasia, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2025/05/02

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.