Management of Perioperative Pain Using Erector Spinae Plane Block in Open Microscopic Lumbar Surgery
NCT ID: NCT06270654
Last Updated: 2024-02-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-06-01
2024-06-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Erector Spinae Block Versus Local Field Block in Lumbar Spine Surgeries
NCT05570565
Erector Spinae Plane Block in Spine Surgeries
NCT05247021
Erector Spinae Plane Block in Spine Surgeries for Postoperative Pain
NCT06970704
Evaluation of Erector Spina Plane Block(ESPB)'s Effectiveness on Patients With Lumbar Radiculopathy
NCT05261581
Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Adult Patients Undergoing Thoracoscopy
NCT03454191
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is an interfascial plane block where local anaesthetic is injected in a plane preferably below the erector spinae muscle. It can provide thoracic, abdominal, and even some lower extremity analgesia. It was also theorised that erector spinae plane block can reduce opioid use and provide analgesia for lumbar surgery. The financial cost that is saved by reducing the length of hospital stay, perioperative morbidity will warrant the use of erector spinae plane block in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control group
Pre incision of 0.375% ropivacaine 10ml local infiltration will be given.
Skin infiltration LA
Pre incision of 0.375% ropivacaine 10ml local infiltration will be given to control group
Ropivacaine group
Bilateral erector spinae plane block (0.375% 20ml ropivacaine on each side + adrenaline 1:200,000) pre incision.
Erector spinae plane block
After consent was obtained, patients will be randomised into control group and an intervention group. For patients randomized into the interventional group, bilateral erector spinae plane block will be performed under general anaesthesia in prone position before the operation. An experienced anaesthetist performs this under ultrasound guidance (using curvilinear probe) in a sterile method.
After identifying L3 transverse process, 21G Stimuplex needle will be inserted via in-plane method. Once needle placement is confirmed and aspiration is negative, 20ml of ropivacaine 0.375% with adrenaline 1:200,000 dilution will be given on each side.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Erector spinae plane block
After consent was obtained, patients will be randomised into control group and an intervention group. For patients randomized into the interventional group, bilateral erector spinae plane block will be performed under general anaesthesia in prone position before the operation. An experienced anaesthetist performs this under ultrasound guidance (using curvilinear probe) in a sterile method.
After identifying L3 transverse process, 21G Stimuplex needle will be inserted via in-plane method. Once needle placement is confirmed and aspiration is negative, 20ml of ropivacaine 0.375% with adrenaline 1:200,000 dilution will be given on each side.
Skin infiltration LA
Pre incision of 0.375% ropivacaine 10ml local infiltration will be given to control group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients with Glasgow Coma Scale of 15.
* American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification I - II patients
* Scheduled for elective, open microscopic lumbar surgery (less than 3 levels) under general anesthesia.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient refusal
* Weight\<50kg, \>120kg
* Allergy to local anesthesia
* Alcohol/ drug abuse
* Renal failure or liver failure
* Coagulopathy/thrombocytopenia
* Chronic pain with chronic opioid usage
* Ischemic heart disease
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Malaya
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Universiti Malaya Medical Centre
Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Siddiqui N, Krishnan S, Dua A, Cascella M. Erector Spinae Plane Block. 2025 May 3. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK545305/
Donnally III CJ, Hanna A, Varacallo MA. Lumbar Degenerative Disk Disease. 2023 Aug 4. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK448134/
Kim HS, Wu PH, Jang IT. Lumbar Degenerative Disease Part 1: Anatomy and Pathophysiology of Intervertebral Discogenic Pain and Radiofrequency Ablation of Basivertebral and Sinuvertebral Nerve Treatment for Chronic Discogenic Back Pain: A Prospective Case Series and Review of Literature. Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Feb 21;21(4):1483. doi: 10.3390/ijms21041483.
Grotle M, Smastuen MC, Fjeld O, Grovle L, Helgeland J, Storheim K, Solberg TK, Zwart JA. Lumbar spine surgery across 15 years: trends, complications and reoperations in a longitudinal observational study from Norway. BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 1;9(8):e028743. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028743.
Bajwa SJ, Haldar R. Pain management following spinal surgeries: An appraisal of the available options. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2015 Jul-Sep;6(3):105-10. doi: 10.4103/0974-8237.161589.
Tan M, Law LS, Gan TJ. Optimizing pain management to facilitate Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathways. Can J Anaesth. 2015 Feb;62(2):203-18. doi: 10.1007/s12630-014-0275-x. Epub 2014 Dec 10.
Gan TJ. Poorly controlled postoperative pain: prevalence, consequences, and prevention. J Pain Res. 2017 Sep 25;10:2287-2298. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S144066. eCollection 2017.
Jain K, Jaiswal V, Puri A. Erector spinae plane block: Relatively new block on horizon with a wide spectrum of application - A case series. Indian J Anaesth. 2018 Oct;62(10):809-813. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_263_18.
Kot P, Rodriguez P, Granell M, Cano B, Rovira L, Morales J, Broseta A, Andres J. The erector spinae plane block: a narrative review. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2019 Jun;72(3):209-220. doi: 10.4097/kja.d.19.00012. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
Canitez A, Kozanhan B, Aksoy N, Yildiz M, Tutar MS. Effect of erector spinae plane block on the postoperative quality of recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective double-blind study. Br J Anaesth. 2021 Oct;127(4):629-635. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.06.030. Epub 2021 Jul 31.
Vaughan BN, Bartone CL, McCarthy CM, Answini GA, Hurford WE. Ultrasound-Guided Continuous Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Blocks Are Associated with Reduced Opioid Consumption and Length of Stay for Open Cardiac Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study. J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 28;10(21):5022. doi: 10.3390/jcm10215022.
Lin H, Guan J, Luo S, Chen S, Jiang J. Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block for Quality of Recovery Following Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Pain Ther. 2022 Sep;11(3):861-871. doi: 10.1007/s40122-022-00395-9. Epub 2022 May 23.
Jin Y, Zhao S, Cai J, Blessing M, Zhao X, Tan H, Li J. Erector Spinae Plane Block for Perioperative Pain Control and Short-term Outcomes in Lumbar Laminoplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Pain Res. 2021 Sep 3;14:2717-2727. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S321514. eCollection 2021.
Zhang TJ, Zhang JJ, Qu ZY, Zhang HY, Qiu Y, Hua Z. Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Blocks for Open Posterior Lumbar Surgery. J Pain Res. 2020 Apr 5;13:709-717. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S248171. eCollection 2020.
Bhardwaj N. Enhanced recovery after surgery. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Apr;35(Suppl 1):S3-S4. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_57_19. No abstract available.
Kaye AD, Urman RD, Rappaport Y, Siddaiah H, Cornett EM, Belani K, Salinas OJ, Fox CJ. Multimodal analgesia as an essential part of enhanced recovery protocols in the ambulatory settings. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Apr;35(Suppl 1):S40-S45. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_51_18.
Echeverria-Villalobos M, Stoicea N, Todeschini AB, Fiorda-Diaz J, Uribe AA, Weaver T, Bergese SD. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS): A Perspective Review of Postoperative Pain Management Under ERAS Pathways and Its Role on Opioid Crisis in the United States. Clin J Pain. 2020 Mar;36(3):219-226. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000792.
Neuman MD, Bateman BT, Wunsch H. Inappropriate opioid prescription after surgery. Lancet. 2019 Apr 13;393(10180):1547-1557. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30428-3.
Avis G, Gricourt Y, Vialatte PB, Meunier V, Perin M, Simon N, Claret PG, El Fertit H, Lefrant JY, Bertrand M, Cuvillon P. Analgesic efficacy of erector spinae plane blocks for lumbar spine surgery: a randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2022 Jul 21:rapm-2022-103737. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2022-103737. Online ahead of print.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2023322-12280
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.