HEARTWISE - P-CARDIAC for Chinese: Population-based Study
NCT ID: NCT06262828
Last Updated: 2024-10-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
3800 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-04-25
2028-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Self-Scored Cardiovascular Disease Risk Appraisal
NCT00005529
Prospective Assessment of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) Risk
NCT06316453
Polygenic Risk Score for Optimizing Primary Prevention in Intermediate-Risk Populations
NCT07039123
Early Detection of Coronary Artery Disease by Polygenic and Metabolic Risk Scoring
NCT04604353
Risk Factors of Individuals With Coronary Artery Disease
NCT00260104
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Part one is a prospective population-based cohort study. Investigators hypothesize that patients with a higher frequency or larger number of types of cardiac event symptoms are likely to have a higher P-CARDIAC risk score. The correlation between P-CARDIAC risk score and the increasing in number of types and in number of times a patient reported to have heart disease symptoms, e.g. chest pain, shortness of breath, fatigue, swelling in legs, ankles or feet will be examined. The results reassure cardiologists that the P-CARDIAC risk score is sensitive to the heart disease symptoms. Patients who are at a higher risk of recurrent CVD event are likely to have more medications and to have a sooner follow up appointment. At such, investigators also hypothesize a positive relationship between P-CARDIAC risk score and the number of class of medications prescribed and a negative correlation between P-CARDIAC risk score and the time to next SOPC follow up appointment.
Part two of the study will involve Delphi technique to determine P-CARDIAC risk thresholds with reference to current clinical management guideline such as American Heart Association (AHA)/American College of Cardiology (ACC) Multisociety Guideline (AHA/ACC) and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) (ESC/EAS), and this part will not involve patient contact. Investigators will compare the P-CARDIAC risk score and the clinician's rating of a patient's recurrent CVD risk on a 10% random subgroup of patients from part one in a "silent deployment" approach, ie, an individual patient's P-CARDIAC risk score will not be communicated to cardiologists. Cardiologists will be invited to rate if they think the patient is at high or low risk according to existing risk scores and the proposed treatment management and target based on treatment guidelines based on their experience. Each patient profile will be reviewed by at least 2 cardiologists and discussed to reach a consensus. Investigators will then evaluate the sensitivity of P-CARDIAC risk score with clinician's judgment. Prior to the commencement of Part two, investigators will collect insights from cardiologists regarding the interpretability of performance metrics and acceptable threshold of model performance for clinical practice. In addition, through this exercise, the research team will assist cardiologists to draft a guideline for follow up for patients at different risk level.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The University of Hong Kong
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dr Sze Ling Celine Chui
Assistant Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sze Ling Celine Chui, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
School of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
School of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong
Hong Kong, , Hong Kong
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Zhiting G, Jiaying T, Haiying H, Yuping Z, Qunfei Y, Jingfen J. Cardiovascular disease risk prediction models in the Chinese population- a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2022 Aug 24;22(1):1608. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13995-z.
Stone NJ, Robinson JG, Lichtenstein AH, Bairey Merz CN, Blum CB, Eckel RH, Goldberg AC, Gordon D, Levy D, Lloyd-Jones DM, McBride P, Schwartz JS, Shero ST, Smith SC Jr, Watson K, Wilson PW, Eddleman KM, Jarrett NM, LaBresh K, Nevo L, Wnek J, Anderson JL, Halperin JL, Albert NM, Bozkurt B, Brindis RG, Curtis LH, DeMets D, Hochman JS, Kovacs RJ, Ohman EM, Pressler SJ, Sellke FW, Shen WK, Smith SC Jr, Tomaselli GF; American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014 Jun 24;129(25 Suppl 2):S1-45. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000437738.63853.7a. Epub 2013 Nov 12. No abstract available.
Damman P, van 't Hof AW, Ten Berg JM, Jukema JW, Appelman Y, Liem AH, de Winter RJ. 2015 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: comments from the Dutch ACS working group. Neth Heart J. 2017 Mar;25(3):181-185. doi: 10.1007/s12471-016-0939-y.
Writing Committee Members; Drozda JP Jr, Ferguson TB Jr, Jneid H, Krumholz HM, Nallamothu BK, Olin JW, Ting HH; ACC/AHATask Force On Performance Measures; Heidenreich PA, Albert NM, Chan PS, Curtis LH, Ferguson TB Jr, Fonarow GC, Ho PM, O'Brien S, Russo AM, Thomas RJ, Ting HH, Varosy PD. 2015 ACC/AHA Focused Update of Secondary Prevention Lipid Performance Measures: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016 Jan;9(1):68-95. doi: 10.1161/HCQ.0000000000000014. Epub 2015 Dec 14. No abstract available.
Barrett D, Heale R. What are Delphi studies? Evid Based Nurs. 2020 Jul;23(3):68-69. doi: 10.1136/ebnurs-2020-103303. Epub 2020 May 19. No abstract available.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CIRB-2024-240-3
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.