MedDataX Logo

Evaluating Process of Change in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Depression

NCT ID: NCT06245096

Last Updated: 2025-12-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-01-15

Study Completion Date

2026-04-27

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will compare two psychological treatments for major depressive disorder (MDD): cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT). Both treatments are well-studied and supported by evidence as effective options for people experiencing depression. These treatments will be delivered in an online group format via Zoom.

The study will enroll up to 100 participants with depression. Half of the participants will receive online group CBT and half will receive online group ACT. There will be up to 10 members in each group. For both conditions, treatment will be provided over 8 weeks, with a 6-month follow-up period. Enrollment will be ongoing and groups will occur simultaneously.

Potential participants are asked to complete an initial screening and an intake evaluation to determine eligibility. They will then receive 8-weeks of treatment. Participants will complete self-report questionnaires throughout their time in the study.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Some of the most powerful tools to combat depression come in the form of psychotherapies, including Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT). While both treatments have been found to be generally effective in treating depression, they take fundamentally different treatment approaches. In CBT, clients learn techniques to challenge and change maladaptive thought and behavioral patterns. In ACT, clients learn techniques to accept their negative internal experiences and commit to action in line with their values. Despite being among the most effective treatments for depression, both CBT and ACT have a response rate of about only 50%. It is believe there are two key reasons investigators have not been able to improve these response rates. First, very little is known about which specific therapeutic skills are effective in these treatment packages. For example, do cognitive or behavioral change skills lead to therapeutic change in CBT? In ACT, do acceptance or change skills lead to therapeutic change? Second, it is not known which specific treatments or therapeutic skills work better for different individuals. Every individual has diverse needs, and therefore individuals may benefit differently from different treatment packages or from specific skills within each package.

Therefore, investigators plan to run a randomized controlled trial comparing CBT and ACT for depression in order to investigate which specific therapeutic skills are effective in these treatment packages. This approach will also allow investigators to identify predictors of differential response to treatment packages and specific treatment skills.

Upon joining the study, participants are asked to complete surveys for one week prior to starting treatment and again for one week once treatment is completed. During treatment, they are asked to complete surveys throughout the 8 weeks of therapy. Following the 8-week treatment, participants are asked to complete monthly follow-up surveys for 6 months.

There are three main objectives in this study. The first is to compare processes of change across the two treatments (i.e., what works in specific treatments?). The second is to determine client variables that predict differential treatment response (i.e., which treatment works best for a given client?). The third is to evaluate potential moderators of differential response to any specific skills across the treatments (i.e., which specific therapy skill works best for a given client?)

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Depression

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

Over 8 sessions, clients learn techniques to challenge and change maladaptive thought and behavioral patterns

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Sessions will focus on skills such as behavioral activation, mood tracking, identifying and reframing automatic thoughts, assertion training and smart goals.

Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

Over 8 sessions, clients learn techniques to accept their negative internal experiences and commit to action in line with their values

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Sessions will focus on skills such as mindfulness, acceptance and willingness training, values clarification, committed action, defusion, and self-as-context.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

Sessions will focus on skills such as behavioral activation, mood tracking, identifying and reframing automatic thoughts, assertion training and smart goals.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

Sessions will focus on skills such as mindfulness, acceptance and willingness training, values clarification, committed action, defusion, and self-as-context.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* diagnosis of major depressive disorder (MDD) according to DSM-V criteria (APA, 2013)
* 18 years of age or older
* access to a private location with a stable internet connection and a working video camera
* lives in California
* able to understand and speak English
* able and willing to give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* current diagnosis other than MDD if it constitutes the predominant aspect of the clinical presentation and if it requires treatment other than that being offered
* clear indication of secondary gain (e.g., court ordered treatment)
* current suicide risk or significant intentional self-harm in the last six months sufficient to preclude treatment on an outpatient basis.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Southern California

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Iony Ezawa

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Iony D Ezawa, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Southern California

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Southern California

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Dao A, Bernstein RA, Ramos FN, Beasley B, Ezawa ID. Unpacking the chain of change in group CBT and ACT for depression: A protocol for a randomized clinical trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2025 Jun;153:107907. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2025.107907. Epub 2025 Apr 2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40185199 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UP-23-01077

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id