Replantation Following Complete Penile Amputation

NCT ID: NCT06244927

Last Updated: 2024-02-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-11-23

Study Completion Date

2024-01-18

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this observational study Replantation following Complete Penile Amputation a case series before and after study is to help andrologist and urologists deal with such rare male emergencies easily in emergency situation. There are only limited case reports of penile amputation, a rare urological emergency with a low treatment success rate, and there are still no advanced, detailed surgical or perioperative treatment plans.The main question\[s\] it aims to answer are:

•The investigators used questionnaire to ask participants who undergo replantation surgery to reply. These are the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) before and after surgery; the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) estimate for urination after surgery; the Quality of Life index (QoL) estimate, which characterized quality of life into 7 categories: happy (0), satisfied (1), general satisfied (2), not bad (3), not too satisfied (4), distressed (5), and terrible (6). The appearance satisfaction score was based on four levels: from unsatisfactory (1), slight unsatisfactory (2), satisfactory (3) to very satisfactory(4).

Participants (Patients) only need to reply question above. This is observational before and after case study.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Twenty participants (aged 6-58 years) who were treated at investigators' hospital over the past years and ultimately underwent surgery and follow-up assessment were included. The relevant research was approved by the Ethics Committee of Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Approval NO.: 2023-0699. All 20 amputated phalli were adequately preserved; the neurovascular structures in the proximal stump were readily identified and in a suitable condition for anastomosis. All of these parameters were evaluated by the investigators, who believed that anastomosis could be attempted. The surgery was performed under the guidance of the investigators, and the same surgical methods were used. Surgical methods and perioperative processes were performed as described below. The participants' preoperative erectile functions and urination scores are shown in Table 1. Each of the participants and their families desired penis replantation after the accident, even if the amputation occurred because of a psychological disorder. A participant may not be willing to undergo replantation due to psychological issues, but their families are supportive of replantation. And surgeons believe that there is high probability of successful anastomosis creation. This participant was constraint to undergoing treatment. The participants' details can be found in Table 1. The investigators used the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) before and after surgery; the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) estimate for urination after surgery; the Quality of Life index (QoL) estimate, which characterized quality of life into 7 categories: happy (0), satisfied (1), general satisfied (2), not bad (3), not too satisfied (4), distressed (5), and terrible (6). The appearance satisfaction score was based on four levels: from unsatisfactory (1), slight unsatisfactory (2), satisfactory (3) to very satisfactory(4)

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Penile Amputation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Only 20 patients undergo replantation following penile amputation were investigate, only 1group

Patients undergo surgery.

Replantation surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Surgery

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Replantation surgery

Surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Patients who received replantation surgeries following penile amputation. And complete follow-up data.

Exclusion Criteria

Patients who not received replantation surgeries following penile amputation. Or Incomplete follow-up data.
Minimum Eligible Age

6 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

58 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hanchao Liu

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, affiliated with the Zhejiang University School of Medicine

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2023-0699

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.