The Effect of Semaglutide on Disordered Eating Behaviour in Type 2 Diabetic Patients
NCT ID: NCT06243536
Last Updated: 2024-02-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
PHASE4
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-02-01
2024-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In this prospective study the investigators aim to recruit 60 patients with type 2 diabetes and randomize them based on the presence of a disordered eating behaviour diagnosed by a validated questionnaire (1:1). Patients with a disordered eating behaviour will further be randomized (1:1) to receive semaglutide. At baseline and after 12 weeks of semaglutide therapy, the investigators will reevaluate glucose variability over 14 days using a continuous glucose monitoring device (CGM).
With this study the investigators will determine the impact of GLP-1 receptor agonist semaglutide on disordered eating behaviour in patients with overweight and type 2 diabetes. This study will contribute to the knowledge about the role of incretin hormones and glucose variability in eating disorders in this population of patients.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Heart Disease Study of Semaglutide in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
NCT03914326
Understanding Acute Dietary Changes After GLP-1 Agonist Treatment: The GLaD Feasibility Study
NCT07001553
Semaglutide and Intestinal Iron Absorption
NCT06629688
A Research Study to Understand How Oral Semaglutide Works in People With Type 2 Diabetes in India
NCT05502562
A Trial Investigating the Effects of Semaglutide on ß-cell Function in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes
NCT02212067
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A factor analysis of EAT-26 scores will be conducted to form 3 (expected) latent variables (components). To assess the effect on dietary habits, the difference in EAT-26 total score and latent variables between subjects randomized to semaglutide and control subjects (randomized to standard care) will be assessed after 3 months of treatment. The data will be analysed in a general linear model, with basal covariates: age, sex, BMI and score at the beginning of treatment. In the same way, the effect of semaglutide on GLP1 concentrations (basal covariate: basal concentration next to the location of the EAT-26 score) will be evaluated, separately for the condition before and after the mixed meal test. GLP-1 and GIP concentrations will be compared between subjects with ("exposed") and without (control) eating disorders, in a generalized linear model for repeated measurements (GLP-1 concentration before and after mixed meal test) with fixed covariates: age, sex, BMI, time ( before or after mixed meal test) and exposure\*time interactions. Type I (α) error=0.05.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Type 2 diabetic patients without disordered eating behaviour
Treated with standard of care.
standard of care
Patients not assigned to receive semaglutide will receive standard of care.
Type 2 diabetic patients with disordered eating behaviour A
Treated with standard of care.
standard of care
Patients not assigned to receive semaglutide will receive standard of care.
Type 2 diabetic patients with disordered eating behaviour B
Receiving semaglutide for 12 weeks
Semaglutide
Semaglutide will be administered through 12 weeks.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Semaglutide
Semaglutide will be administered through 12 weeks.
standard of care
Patients not assigned to receive semaglutide will receive standard of care.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Zagreb School of Medicine
UNKNOWN
University Hospital Sestre Milosrdnice
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jelena Marinkovic Radosevic
Principal Ivenstigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jelena Osmanović Barilar, Professor
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University of Zagreb School of Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
UH Sestre milosrdnice
Zagreb, , Croatia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Saeedi P, Petersohn I, Salpea P, Malanda B, Karuranga S, Unwin N, Colagiuri S, Guariguata L, Motala AA, Ogurtsova K, Shaw JE, Bright D, Williams R; IDF Diabetes Atlas Committee. Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9th edition. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019 Nov;157:107843. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.107843. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
Defronzo RA. Banting Lecture. From the triumvirate to the ominous octet: a new paradigm for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes. 2009 Apr;58(4):773-95. doi: 10.2337/db09-9028. No abstract available.
Nieto-Martinez R, Gonzalez-Rivas JP, Medina-Inojosa JR, Florez H. Are Eating Disorders Risk Factors for Type 2 Diabetes? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Curr Diab Rep. 2017 Nov 22;17(12):138. doi: 10.1007/s11892-017-0949-1.
Garcia-Mayor RV, Garcia-Soidan FJ. Eating disoders in type 2 diabetic people: Brief review. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2017 Jul-Sep;11(3):221-224. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2016.08.004. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
Presseller EK, Patarinski AGG, Zhang F, Page KA, Srivastava P, Manasse SM, Juarascio AS. Glucose variability: A physiological correlate of eating disorder behaviors among individuals with binge-spectrum eating disorders. Int J Eat Disord. 2022 Dec;55(12):1788-1798. doi: 10.1002/eat.23838. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
Suh S, Kim JH. Glycemic Variability: How Do We Measure It and Why Is It Important? Diabetes Metab J. 2015 Aug;39(4):273-82. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2015.39.4.273.
Papelbaum M, de Oliveira Moreira R, Coutinho WF, Kupfer R, Freitas S, Raggio Luz R, Appolinario JC. Does binge-eating matter for glycemic control in type 2 diabetes patients? J Eat Disord. 2019 Sep 6;7:30. doi: 10.1186/s40337-019-0260-4. eCollection 2019.
Martinez M, Santamarina J, Pavesi A, Musso C, Umpierrez GE. Glycemic variability and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2021 Mar;9(1):e002032. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-002032.
Daly A, Hovorka R. Technology in the management of type 2 diabetes: Present status and future prospects. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021 Aug;23(8):1722-1732. doi: 10.1111/dom.14418. Epub 2021 May 20.
Mancuso SG, Newton JR, Bosanac P, Rossell SL, Nesci JB, Castle DJ. Classification of eating disorders: comparison of relative prevalence rates using DSM-IV and DSM-5 criteria. Br J Psychiatry. 2015 Jun;206(6):519-20. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.113.143461. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
Nicolau J, Simo R, Sanchis P, Ayala L, Fortuny R, Zubillaga I, Masmiquel L. Eating disorders are frequent among type 2 diabetic patients and are associated with worse metabolic and psychological outcomes: results from a cross-sectional study in primary and secondary care settings. Acta Diabetol. 2015 Dec;52(6):1037-44. doi: 10.1007/s00592-015-0742-z. Epub 2015 Apr 5.
Herpertz S, Albus C, Kielmann R, Hagemann-Patt H, Lichtblau K, Kohle K, Mann K, Senf W. Comorbidity of diabetes mellitus and eating disorders: a follow-up study. J Psychosom Res. 2001 Nov;51(5):673-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3999(01)00246-x.
Watts AG, Kanoski SE, Sanchez-Watts G, Langhans W. The physiological control of eating: signals, neurons, and networks. Physiol Rev. 2022 Apr 1;102(2):689-813. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00028.2020. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
Tong J, D'Alessio D. Eating disorders and gastrointestinal peptides. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2011 Feb;18(1):42-9. doi: 10.1097/MED.0b013e328341e12b.
Smith KR, Moran TH. Gastrointestinal peptides in eating-related disorders. Physiol Behav. 2021 Sep 1;238:113456. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2021.113456. Epub 2021 May 11.
Dixon KN, O'Dorisio TM, Zipf W, Cataland S. Gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) in anorexia nervosa. Int. J. Eat. Disord. 1985, 4: 597-604
Cho YM, Fujita Y, Kieffer TJ. Glucagon-like peptide-1: glucose homeostasis and beyond. Annu Rev Physiol. 2014;76:535-59. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-021113-170315. Epub 2013 Nov 13.
Elliott RM, Morgan LM, Tredger JA, Deacon S, Wright J, Marks V. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (7-36)amide and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide secretion in response to nutrient ingestion in man: acute post-prandial and 24-h secretion patterns. J Endocrinol. 1993 Jul;138(1):159-66. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.1380159.
Sharma D, Verma S, Vaidya S, Kalia K, Tiwari V. Recent updates on GLP-1 agonists: Current advancements & challenges. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018 Dec;108:952-962. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.08.088. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
Nauck MA, Quast DR, Wefers J, Meier JJ. GLP-1 receptor agonists in the treatment of type 2 diabetes - state-of-the-art. Mol Metab. 2021 Apr;46:101102. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2020.101102. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
Baggio LL, Drucker DJ. Biology of incretins: GLP-1 and GIP. Gastroenterology. 2007 May;132(6):2131-57. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.03.054.
Tommerdahl KL, Nadeau KJ, Bjornstad P. Mechanisms of Cardiorenal Protection of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2021 Jul;28(4):337-346. doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2021.06.001.
Bullock BP, Heller RS, Habener JF. Tissue distribution of messenger ribonucleic acid encoding the rat glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor. Endocrinology. 1996 Jul;137(7):2968-78. doi: 10.1210/endo.137.7.8770921.
Drucker DJ. Mechanisms of Action and Therapeutic Application of Glucagon-like Peptide-1. Cell Metab. 2018 Apr 3;27(4):740-756. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.03.001.
Hsu TM, Noble EE, Liu CM, Cortella AM, Konanur VR, Suarez AN, Reiner DJ, Hahn JD, Hayes MR, Kanoski SE. A hippocampus to prefrontal cortex neural pathway inhibits food motivation through glucagon-like peptide-1 signaling. Mol Psychiatry. 2018 Jul;23(7):1555-1565. doi: 10.1038/mp.2017.91. Epub 2017 May 2.
McElroy SL, Mori N, Guerdjikova AI, Keck PE Jr. Would glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists have efficacy in binge eating disorder and bulimia nervosa? A review of the current literature. Med Hypotheses. 2018 Feb;111:90-93. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2017.12.029. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
Robert SA, Rohana AG, Shah SA, Chinna K, Wan Mohamud WN, Kamaruddin NA. Improvement in binge eating in non-diabetic obese individuals after 3 months of treatment with liraglutide - A pilot study. Obes Res Clin Pract. 2015 May-Jun;9(3):301-4. doi: 10.1016/j.orcp.2015.03.005. Epub 2015 Apr 11.
Jensterle M, Kocjan T, Kravos NA, Pfeifer M, Janez A. Short-term intervention with liraglutide improved eating behavior in obese women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Endocr Res. 2015;40(3):133-8. doi: 10.3109/07435800.2014.966385. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
Da Porto A, Casarsa V, Colussi G, Catena C, Cavarape A, Sechi L. Dulaglutide reduces binge episodes in type 2 diabetic patients with binge eating disorder: A pilot study. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020 Jul-Aug;14(4):289-292. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.03.009. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
Frias JP, Nakhle S, Ruggles JA, Zhuplatov S, Klein E, Zhou R, Strange P. Exenatide once weekly improved 24-hour glucose control and reduced glycaemic variability in metformin-treated participants with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017 Jan;19(1):40-48. doi: 10.1111/dom.12763. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
FLAT-SUGAR Trial Investigators. Glucose Variability in a 26-Week Randomized Comparison of Mealtime Treatment With Rapid-Acting Insulin Versus GLP-1 Agonist in Participants With Type 2 Diabetes at High Cardiovascular Risk. Diabetes Care. 2016 Jun;39(6):973-81. doi: 10.2337/dc15-2782. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
Pratley RE, Catarig AM, Lingvay I, Viljoen A, Paine A, Lawson J, Chubb B, Gorst-Rasmussen A, Miresashvili N. An indirect treatment comparison of the efficacy of semaglutide 1.0 mg versus dulaglutide 3.0 and 4.5 mg. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021 Nov;23(11):2513-2520. doi: 10.1111/dom.14497. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
Takahashi Y, Nomoto H, Yokoyama H, Takano Y, Nagai S, Tsuzuki A, Cho KY, Miya A, Kameda H, Takeuchi J, Taneda S, Kurihara Y, Atsumi T, Nakamura A, Miyoshi H; SWITCH-SEMA 1 study group. Improvement of glycaemic control and treatment satisfaction by switching from liraglutide or dulaglutide to subcutaneous semaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes: A multicentre, prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel-group comparison study (SWITCH-SEMA 1 study). Diabetes Obes Metab. 2023 Jun;25(6):1503-1511. doi: 10.1111/dom.14998. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
Rahelic D, Altabas V, Bakula M, Balic S, Balint I, Markovic BB, Bicanic N, Bjelinski I, Bozikov V, Varzic SC, Car N, Berkovic MC, Orlic ZC, Deskin M, Sunic ED, Tomic NG, Goldoni V, Gradiser M, Mahecic DH, Balen MJ, Erzen DJ, Majanovic SK, Kokic' S, Krnic M, Kruljac I, Liberati-Cizmek AM, Martina L, Metelko Z, Mirosevic G, Vrbica SM, Renar IP, Petric D, Prasek M, Prpic-Kizevac I, Radman M, Soldo D, Saric T, Tesanovic S, Kurir TT, Wensveen TT, Botica M, Vrkljan M, Rotkvic VZ, Zoric C, Krznaric Z. [CROATIAN GUIDELINES FOR THE PHARMACOTHERAPY OF TYPE 2 DIABETES]. Lijec Vjesn. 2016 Jan-Feb;138(1-2):1-21. Croatian.
Meier JJ. Efficacy of Semaglutide in a Subcutaneous and an Oral Formulation. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Jun 25;12:645617. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.645617. eCollection 2021.
Garner DM, Olmsted MP, Bohr Y, Garfinkel PE. The eating attitudes test: psychometric features and clinical correlates. Psychol Med. 1982 Nov;12(4):871-8. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700049163.
Ambrosi-Randic N, Pokrajac-Bulian A. Psychometric properties of the eating attitudes test and children's eating attitudes test in Croatia. Eat Weight Disord. 2005 Dec;10(4):e76-82. doi: 10.1007/BF03327495.
Battelino T, Danne T, Bergenstal RM, Amiel SA, Beck R, Biester T, Bosi E, Buckingham BA, Cefalu WT, Close KL, Cobelli C, Dassau E, DeVries JH, Donaghue KC, Dovc K, Doyle FJ 3rd, Garg S, Grunberger G, Heller S, Heinemann L, Hirsch IB, Hovorka R, Jia W, Kordonouri O, Kovatchev B, Kowalski A, Laffel L, Levine B, Mayorov A, Mathieu C, Murphy HR, Nimri R, Norgaard K, Parkin CG, Renard E, Rodbard D, Saboo B, Schatz D, Stoner K, Urakami T, Weinzimer SA, Phillip M. Clinical Targets for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Interpretation: Recommendations From the International Consensus on Time in Range. Diabetes Care. 2019 Aug;42(8):1593-1603. doi: 10.2337/dci19-0028. Epub 2019 Jun 8.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Magliano DJ, Boyko EJ; IDF Diabetes Atlas 10th edition scientific committee. IDF diabetes atlas 10th ed. \[Internet\]. Brussels: International Diabetes Federation; 2021
Buble T, Čavlina M. Nacionalni registar osoba sa šećernom bolešću CroDiab. Izvješće za 2022. \[Internet\]. Zagreb: Hrvatski zavod za javno zdravstvo; 2022
U. S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service. USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference, Legacy Release. \[Internet\]. 2018
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
251-29-1 1/3-23-06
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.