Trial Outcomes & Findings for DrIFT 2 Study: Displacement in Feeding Tubes (NCT NCT06239610)
NCT ID: NCT06239610
Last Updated: 2025-08-11
Results Overview
Number of participants with clincially significant feeding tube retrograde migration
COMPLETED
NA
119 participants
5 days or until FT removed, whichever came first
2025-08-11
Participant Flow
One patient was removed due to a missing feeding tube stylet.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Feeding Tube Migration
Use of an EMPD to assess for FT migration in all eligible critical care patients requiring the use of a feeding tube during admission.
electromagnetic placement device: Daily use of an EMPD to verify FT position
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
119
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
108
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
11
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Feeding Tube Migration
Use of an EMPD to assess for FT migration in all eligible critical care patients requiring the use of a feeding tube during admission.
electromagnetic placement device: Daily use of an EMPD to verify FT position
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
no usable migration data for minimum of one day
|
11
|
Baseline Characteristics
The 12 patients, who could not be included due to only having one day of FT zone data, were reviewed for reasons of withdrawal. Five (42%) of these patients had unexpected withdrawal of care due to family decisions or hospice admission. Four patients had their FTs removed during ETT extubation. Two patients improved significantly and were able to start an oral diet. One patient was removed due to a missing feeding tube stylet.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Feeding Tube Migration
n=108 Participants
Use of an EMPD to assess for FT migration in all eligible critical care patients requiring the use of a feeding tube during admission.
electromagnetic placement device: Daily use of an EMPD to verify FT position
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=108 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
50 Participants
n=108 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
58 Participants
n=108 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
63.92 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.99 • n=108 Participants • The 12 patients, who could not be included due to only having one day of FT zone data, were reviewed for reasons of withdrawal. Five (42%) of these patients had unexpected withdrawal of care due to family decisions or hospice admission. Four patients had their FTs removed during ETT extubation. Two patients improved significantly and were able to start an oral diet. One patient was removed due to a missing feeding tube stylet.
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
47 Participants
n=108 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
61 Participants
n=108 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
108 participants
n=108 Participants
|
|
BMI
|
30.96 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.42 • n=108 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 5 days or until FT removed, whichever came firstNumber of participants with clincially significant feeding tube retrograde migration
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Feeding Tube Migration
n=108 Participants
Use of an EMPD to assess for FT migration in all eligible critical care patients requiring the use of a feeding tube during admission.
electromagnetic placement device: Daily use of an EMPD to verify FT position
|
|---|---|
|
Tube Migration
|
6 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 5 days or until FT removed, whichever came firstPopulation: Total number of participants in study (n=108) who were intubated 30/108.
Number of participants with clincially significant retrograde migration after extubation
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Feeding Tube Migration
n=30 Participants
Use of an EMPD to assess for FT migration in all eligible critical care patients requiring the use of a feeding tube during admission.
electromagnetic placement device: Daily use of an EMPD to verify FT position
|
|---|---|
|
Effect of ETT Extubation on FT Movement
|
2 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Feeding Tube Migration
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Jan Powers PhD, RN, CCNS, CCRN, CNRN, NE-BC, FCCM
Parkview Health System
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place