Evaluation of Online Tool (E-TOOL SCS) in Spinal Cord Stimulaion
NCT ID: NCT06229015
Last Updated: 2025-01-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
60 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-07-13
2026-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Study Objectives:
Primary Objective: Evaluate the degree of agreement/disagreement between the physicians opinion and the e-tool in selecting patients eligible for spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain. Endpoint: Calculation of the probability of disagreement (πD) between the e-tool and the physicians opinion regarding the appropriateness of the intervention.
Secondary Objective: Evaluate the ability of the e-tool to classify interventions defined as appropriate and highly likely to succeed; (scores 7-9) at 3 different time points: trial, 6-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up. The proportion of interventions that were successful at the trial implantation in different time points will be compared with the proportion of interventions identified as appropriate and highly likely to succeed by the e-tool.
Study Period: 24 months. 12 months of enrollment + 12 months of follow-up. Subjects: Number of subjects to be included: at least 60 (total divided between the two centers)
Participating Centers:
* Pain Therapy Unit - ICSMaugeri, Pavia
* Anesthesia and Pain Therapy SD - Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana Pisa
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Prospective Validation Study of an E-health Tool for Patient Selection for SCS
NCT06853795
Safety and Effectiveness of Spinal Cord Stimulation With Automatic Control to Treat Chronic Pain in an Extended Trial
NCT02161627
Psychological Evaluation After SCS Implantation
NCT05624814
Efficacy of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients With a Failed Back Surgery Syndrome.
NCT03462147
Efficacy and Safety of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients With Chronic Intractable Pain
NCT03858790
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* Chronic pain in the lumbar region and lower limbs, especially in patients who have undergone spine surgeries (Failed Back Surgery Syndrome, FBSS).
* Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS).
* Peripheral neuropathic pain.
* Ischemic pain in the limbs. In daily clinical practice, the heterogeneity of patients often makes it difficult to determine which patients are eligible for this treatment. A large number of clinical studies suggest that cognitive aspects and individual coping mechanisms in dealing with pain experiences impact treatment response. For this reason, international guidelines recommend that individuals considered for SCS should undergo a comprehensive psychological evaluation.
Recently, an online tool (SCS-e-tool) has been implemented for selecting patients eligible for SCS implantation. Developed by a team of experts in pain therapy with various clinical backgrounds, this tool is freely available online and can be used by healthcare professionals. It is designed to assist in evaluating a patients suitability for spinal cord stimulation and aid in making informed clinical decisions.
The SCS-e-tool takes into account various factors, including cognitive aspects and the patient pain management modalities. The goal is to provide a comprehensive and personalized assessment to identify patients who may benefit most from spinal cord stimulation therapy. This tool can be a valuable aid for healthcare professionals in the decision-making process regarding patient selection for SCS therapy.
It is important to note that, despite the utility of assessment tools, the final decision on a patient candidacy for spinal cord stimulation should be based on a comprehensive evaluation that includes clinical, psychological, and individual aspects of the patient.
The implementation of tools like the SCS-e-tool represents a step forward in the personalized approach to chronic pain management and the optimization of patient selection for specific therapies such as spinal cord stimulation.
Recently, an online tool (SCS-e-tool) has been implemented for the selection of patients eligible for SCS implantation, developed by a pool of experts in pain therapy with diverse clinical profiles. This tool, available online for free and built according to the RUAM method, allows the input of various clinical profiles with diagnostic, clinical, and psychological information and provides indications on the likelihood of SCS success and suggestions regarding the need for psycho-social support therapies in conjunction with neurostimulation.
The e-tool scores range from 1 to 9 and are divided as follows: 1-3 inappropriate intervention, 4-6 intervention with uncertain outcomes, 7-9 appropriate intervention with a high probability of success. The e-tool has a dual use for implanters and referrers. For both groups, the scope is similar, but perspectives differ: Referrers perspective: appropriateness in terms of referring a patient to consider SCS as the next step in chronic pain management. Implanter's perspective: appropriateness in terms of selecting a patient for SCS as the next step in chronic pain management.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients with chronic pain and indication for implantation of a temporary neurostimulator for spinal cord stimulation testing.
* Signed informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients in presumed/confirmed pregnancy.
* Contraindications to implantation.
16 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria Pisana
OTHER
Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpA
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
ICSMaugeri Spa
Pavia, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2506 CE
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.