Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study to Investigate the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of VIS954 in Healthy Adult Participants (NCT NCT06212804)
NCT ID: NCT06212804
Last Updated: 2025-07-14
Results Overview
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. A serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a suspected transmission of any infectious agent via an authorized medicinal product or was an important medical event that jeopardized the participant or required medical or surgical intervention to prevent 1 of the other outcomes listed above. TEAEs were AEs that first occurred or worsened in severity after the study intervention administration, and up to Day 71 (including the follow-up period) after the study intervention administration.
COMPLETED
PHASE1
54 participants
From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
2025-07-14
Participant Flow
This Phase 1, double-blind, single ascending dose, first-in-human study was conducted in healthy participants at a single investigational site.
The study was conducted in 6 sequential cohorts. In each cohort, participants were randomized in a 7:2 ratio to receive VIS954 or matching placebo. The study consisted of a screening period (up to 28 days before dosing), dosing on Day 1, a post-dose period (Days 5 to 57) and a final follow-up visit on Day 71. A total of 54 participants were enrolled in the study.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Cohort 1: VIS954 Dose 1
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 1 via subcutaneous (SC) injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 2: VIS954 Dose 2
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 2 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 3: VIS954 Dose 3
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 3 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 4: VIS954 Dose 4
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 4 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 5: VIS954 Dose 5
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 5 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 6: VIS954 Dose 6
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 6 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 1 to 6: Pooled Placebo
Participants received a single dose of placebo matched to VIS954 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
7
|
7
|
7
|
7
|
7
|
7
|
12
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
7
|
7
|
7
|
7
|
7
|
7
|
12
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
A Study to Investigate the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of VIS954 in Healthy Adult Participants
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Cohort 1: VIS954 Dose 1
n=7 Participants
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 1 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 2: VIS954 Dose 2
n=7 Participants
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 2 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 3: VIS954 Dose 3
n=7 Participants
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 3 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 4: VIS954 Dose 4
n=7 Participants
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 4 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 5: VIS954 Dose 5
n=7 Participants
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 5 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 6: VIS954 Dose 6
n=7 Participants
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 6 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 1 to 6: Pooled Placebo
n=12 Participants
Participants received a single dose of placebo matched to VIS954 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Total
n=54 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
35.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2 • n=5 Participants
|
40.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.1 • n=7 Participants
|
38.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6 • n=5 Participants
|
39.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.7 • n=4 Participants
|
39.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3 • n=21 Participants
|
39.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2 • n=8 Participants
|
36.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6 • n=8 Participants
|
38.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3 • n=24 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
29 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
44 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Multiple
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)Population: The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. A serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a suspected transmission of any infectious agent via an authorized medicinal product or was an important medical event that jeopardized the participant or required medical or surgical intervention to prevent 1 of the other outcomes listed above. TEAEs were AEs that first occurred or worsened in severity after the study intervention administration, and up to Day 71 (including the follow-up period) after the study intervention administration.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1: VIS954 Dose 1
n=7 Participants
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 1 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 2: VIS954 Dose 2
n=7 Participants
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 2 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 3: VIS954 Dose 3
n=7 Participants
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 3 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 4: VIS954 Dose 4
n=7 Participants
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 4 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 5: VIS954 Dose 5
n=7 Participants
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 5 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 6: VIS954 Dose 6
n=7 Participants
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 6 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 1 to 6: Pooled Placebo
n=12 Participants
Participants received a single dose of placebo matched to VIS954 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)
TEAEs
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)
TESAEs
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 (1 and 4 hours post-dose), Day 2 (24 hours post-dose), and on Days 3 and 29Population: The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
The Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale was a subjective self-report that was used to record each participant's perception of pain associated with their injection. The scale ranged from 0 to 10 and showed a series of faces ranging from a happy face at 0 which represented "no hurt" to a crying face at 10 which represented "hurts worst." Based on the faces and descriptions, the participant recorded their level of pain. Higher scores indicated more severe pain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1: VIS954 Dose 1
n=7 Participants
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 1 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 2: VIS954 Dose 2
n=7 Participants
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 2 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 3: VIS954 Dose 3
n=7 Participants
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 3 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 4: VIS954 Dose 4
n=7 Participants
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 4 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 5: VIS954 Dose 5
n=7 Participants
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 5 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 6: VIS954 Dose 6
n=7 Participants
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 6 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 1 to 6: Pooled Placebo
n=12 Participants
Participants received a single dose of placebo matched to VIS954 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale
Day 1: 1 hour post-dose
|
0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
0.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.8
|
0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
0.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.2
|
|
Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale
Day 1: 4 hours post-dose
|
0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
0.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.2
|
|
Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale
Day 2: 24 hours post-dose
|
0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
|
Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale
Day 3
|
0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
|
Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale
Day 29
|
0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 (within 2 hours pre-dose) and at multiple timepoints post-dose up to Day 71Population: PK analysis set: participants who received VIS954 and had at least 1 measured post-dose VIS954 serum concentration at scheduled PK time after start of dosing for at least 1 PK analyte without protocol deviations/events with potential to affect evaluation of PK data. As pre-specified in SAP, 13 participants (7 and 6 in Cohorts 1 and 2) were excluded from PK analysis as PK profiles were below limit of quantitation (BLQ). Only participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.
Blood samples were collected for measurement of serum concentrations of VIS954 at the specified time points from Day 1 (within 2 hours pre-dose) to Day 71. The pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of VIS954 were derived using noncompartmental analysis method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1: VIS954 Dose 1
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 1 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 2: VIS954 Dose 2
n=1 Participants
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 2 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 3: VIS954 Dose 3
n=7 Participants
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 3 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 4: VIS954 Dose 4
n=6 Participants
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 4 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 5: VIS954 Dose 5
n=7 Participants
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 5 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 6: VIS954 Dose 6
n=7 Participants
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 6 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 1 to 6: Pooled Placebo
Participants received a single dose of placebo matched to VIS954 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of VIS954
|
—
|
0.0660 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)
Standard Deviation NA
NA indicates that the standard deviation (SD) was not estimable for 1 participant.
|
1.961 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)
Standard Deviation 1.378
|
4.423 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)
Standard Deviation 2.851
|
16.82 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)
Standard Deviation 12.95
|
32.61 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)
Standard Deviation 12.00
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 (within 2 hours pre-dose) and at multiple timepoints post-dose up to Day 71Population: The PK analysis set included all participants who received VIS954 and had at least 1 measured post-dose VIS954 serum concentration at scheduled PK time after start of dosing for at least 1 PK analyte without protocol deviations or events with potential to affect the evaluation of the PK data. As pre-specified in SAP, 13 participants (7 and 6 in Cohorts 1 and 2) were excluded from PK analysis as PK profiles were BLQ. Only participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.
Blood samples were collected for measurement of serum concentrations of VIS954 at the specified time points from Day 1 (within 2 hours pre-dose) to Day 71. The PK parameters of VIS954 were derived using noncompartmental analysis method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1: VIS954 Dose 1
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 1 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 2: VIS954 Dose 2
n=1 Participants
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 2 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 3: VIS954 Dose 3
n=7 Participants
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 3 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 4: VIS954 Dose 4
n=6 Participants
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 4 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 5: VIS954 Dose 5
n=7 Participants
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 5 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 6: VIS954 Dose 6
n=7 Participants
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 6 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 1 to 6: Pooled Placebo
Participants received a single dose of placebo matched to VIS954 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Time of Maximum Serum Concentration (Tmax) of VIS954
|
—
|
48.00 hour
Interval 48.0 to 48.0
|
48.00 hour
Interval 4.02 to 98.35
|
71.82 hour
Interval 48.0 to 166.38
|
74.02 hour
Interval 72.12 to 169.7
|
95.60 hour
Interval 48.0 to 169.7
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 (within 2 hours pre-dose) and at multiple timepoints post-dose up to Day 71Population: The PK analysis set included all participants who received VIS954 and had at least 1 measured post-dose VIS954 serum concentration at scheduled PK time after start of dosing for at least 1 PK analyte without protocol deviations or events with potential to affect the evaluation of the PK data. As pre-specified in SAP, 13 participants (7 and 6 in Cohorts 1 and 2) were excluded from PK analysis as PK profiles were BLQ. Only participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.
Blood samples were collected for measurement of serum concentrations of VIS954 at the specified time points from Day 1 (within 2 hours pre-dose) to Day 71. The PK parameters of VIS954 were derived using noncompartmental analysis method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1: VIS954 Dose 1
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 1 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 2: VIS954 Dose 2
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 2 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 3: VIS954 Dose 3
n=1 Participants
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 3 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 4: VIS954 Dose 4
n=3 Participants
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 4 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 5: VIS954 Dose 5
n=4 Participants
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 5 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 6: VIS954 Dose 6
n=7 Participants
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 6 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 1 to 6: Pooled Placebo
Participants received a single dose of placebo matched to VIS954 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Pre-dose Extrapolated to Infinite Time (AUC0-inf) of VIS954
|
—
|
—
|
395 hour*mcg/mL
Standard Deviation NA
NA indicates that the SD was not estimable for 1 participant.
|
1463 hour*mcg/mL
Standard Deviation 1324
|
5529 hour*mcg/mL
Standard Deviation 1877
|
11560 hour*mcg/mL
Standard Deviation 5503
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 (within 2 hours pre-dose) and at multiple timepoints post-dose up to Day 71Population: The PK analysis set included all participants who received VIS954 and had at least 1 measured post-dose VIS954 serum concentration at scheduled PK time after start of dosing for at least 1 PK analyte without protocol deviations or events with potential to affect the evaluation of the PK data. As pre-specified in SAP, 13 participants (7 and 6 in Cohorts 1 and 2) were excluded from PK analysis as PK profiles were BLQ. Only participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.
Blood samples were collected for measurement of serum concentrations of VIS954 at the specified time points from Day 1 (within 2 hours pre-dose) to Day 71. The PK parameters of VIS954 were derived using noncompartmental analysis method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1: VIS954 Dose 1
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 1 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 2: VIS954 Dose 2
n=1 Participants
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 2 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 3: VIS954 Dose 3
n=7 Participants
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 3 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 4: VIS954 Dose 4
n=6 Participants
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 4 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 5: VIS954 Dose 5
n=7 Participants
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 5 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 6: VIS954 Dose 6
n=7 Participants
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 6 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 1 to 6: Pooled Placebo
Participants received a single dose of placebo matched to VIS954 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Pre-dose to the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC0-last) of VIS954
|
—
|
3.17 hour*mcg/mL
Standard Deviation NA
NA indicates that the SD was not estimable for 1 participant.
|
188.4 hour*mcg/mL
Standard Deviation 151.2
|
872.4 hour*mcg/mL
Standard Deviation 974.1
|
3604 hour*mcg/mL
Standard Deviation 2684
|
11470 hour*mcg/mL
Standard Deviation 5458
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 (within 2 hours pre-dose) and at multiple timepoints post-dose up to Day 71Population: The PK analysis set included all participants who received VIS954 and had at least 1 measured post-dose VIS954 serum concentration at scheduled PK time after start of dosing for at least 1 PK analyte without protocol deviations or events with potential to affect the evaluation of the PK data. As pre-specified in SAP, 13 participants (7 and 6 in Cohorts 1 and 2) were excluded from PK analysis as PK profiles were BLQ. Only participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.
Blood samples were collected for measurement of serum concentrations of VIS954 at the specified time points from Day 1 (within 2 hours pre-dose) to Day 71. The PK parameters of VIS954 were derived using noncompartmental analysis method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1: VIS954 Dose 1
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 1 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 2: VIS954 Dose 2
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 2 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 3: VIS954 Dose 3
n=2 Participants
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 3 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 4: VIS954 Dose 4
n=3 Participants
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 4 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 5: VIS954 Dose 5
n=4 Participants
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 5 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 6: VIS954 Dose 6
n=7 Participants
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 6 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 1 to 6: Pooled Placebo
Participants received a single dose of placebo matched to VIS954 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Apparent Terminal Elimination Half-Life (t1/2) of VIS954
|
—
|
—
|
85.25 hour
Interval 37.5 to 133.0
|
33.6 hour
Interval 25.8 to 105.0
|
48.0 hour
Interval 41.3 to 82.4
|
76.3 hour
Interval 44.7 to 101.0
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 (within 2 hours pre-dose) and at multiple timepoints post-dose up to Day 71Population: The PK analysis set included all participants who received VIS954 and had at least 1 measured post-dose VIS954 serum concentration at scheduled PK time after start of dosing for at least 1 PK analyte without protocol deviations or events with potential to affect the evaluation of the PK data. As pre-specified in SAP, 13 participants (7 and 6 in Cohorts 1 and 2) were excluded from PK analysis as PK profiles were BLQ. Only participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.
Blood samples were collected for measurement of serum concentrations of VIS954 at the specified time points from Day 1 (within 2 hours pre-dose) to Day 71. The PK parameters of VIS954 were derived using noncompartmental analysis method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1: VIS954 Dose 1
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 1 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 2: VIS954 Dose 2
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 2 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 3: VIS954 Dose 3
n=1 Participants
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 3 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 4: VIS954 Dose 4
n=3 Participants
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 4 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 5: VIS954 Dose 5
n=4 Participants
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 5 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 6: VIS954 Dose 6
n=7 Participants
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 6 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 1 to 6: Pooled Placebo
Participants received a single dose of placebo matched to VIS954 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vd/F) of VIS954
|
—
|
—
|
12.3 liter
Standard Deviation NA
NA indicates that the SD was not estimable for 1 participant.
|
10.12 liter
Standard Deviation 1.797
|
5.218 liter
Standard Deviation 1.606
|
8.536 liter
Standard Deviation 5.579
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 (within 2 hours pre-dose) and at multiple timepoints post-dose up to Day 71Population: The PK analysis set included all participants who received VIS954 and had at least 1 measured post-dose VIS954 serum concentration at scheduled PK time after start of dosing for at least 1 PK analyte without protocol deviations or events with potential to affect the evaluation of the PK data. As pre-specified in SAP, 13 participants (7 and 6 in Cohorts 1 and 2) were excluded from PK analysis as PK profiles were BLQ. Only participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.
Blood samples were collected for measurement of serum concentrations of VIS954 at the specified time points from Day 1 (within 2 hours pre-dose) to Day 71. The PK parameters of VIS954 were derived using noncompartmental analysis method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1: VIS954 Dose 1
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 1 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 2: VIS954 Dose 2
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 2 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 3: VIS954 Dose 3
n=1 Participants
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 3 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 4: VIS954 Dose 4
n=3 Participants
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 4 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 5: VIS954 Dose 5
n=4 Participants
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 5 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 6: VIS954 Dose 6
n=7 Participants
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 6 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 1 to 6: Pooled Placebo
Participants received a single dose of placebo matched to VIS954 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Apparent Clearance After Extravascular Dosing (CL/F) of VIS954
|
—
|
—
|
0.228 liter per hour
Standard Deviation NA
NA indicates that the SD was not estimable for 1 participant.
|
0.1864 liter per hour
Standard Deviation 0.1108
|
0.06911 liter per hour
Standard Deviation 0.02358
|
0.07976 liter per hour
Standard Deviation 0.05542
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -1) up to Day 71Population: The PD analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo) and had at least 1 measured PD value at a scheduled time point after start of dosing.
Blood samples were collected at the specified time points to characterize the effect of VIS954 binding. The time spent above 40% RO was defined as duration in hours from date and time of dosing until the date and time of pharmacodynamic (PD) collection when %RO \>40%. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement taken prior to reference start date (including unscheduled assessments).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1: VIS954 Dose 1
n=7 Participants
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 1 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 2: VIS954 Dose 2
n=7 Participants
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 2 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 3: VIS954 Dose 3
n=7 Participants
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 3 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 4: VIS954 Dose 4
n=7 Participants
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 4 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 5: VIS954 Dose 5
n=7 Participants
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 5 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 6: VIS954 Dose 6
n=7 Participants
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 6 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 1 to 6: Pooled Placebo
n=12 Participants
Participants received a single dose of placebo matched to VIS954 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Time Spent Above 40 Percentage Receptor Occupancy (RO) for Neutrophils
|
0.0 hour
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
|
48.0 hour
Interval 0.0 to 74.1
|
239.2 hour
Interval 215.8 to 314.1
|
335.5 hour
Interval 239.7 to 671.4
|
503.1 hour
Interval 217.0 to 673.7
|
1008.1 hour
Interval 838.9 to 1680.0
|
0.0 hour
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
|
Adverse Events
Cohort 1: VIS954 Dose 1
Cohort 2: VIS954 Dose 2
Cohort 3: VIS954 Dose 3
Cohort 4: VIS954 Dose 4
Cohort 5: VIS954 Dose 5
Cohort 6: VIS954 Dose 6
Cohort 1 to 6: Pooled Placebo
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Cohort 1: VIS954 Dose 1
n=7 participants at risk
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 1 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 2: VIS954 Dose 2
n=7 participants at risk
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 2 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 3: VIS954 Dose 3
n=7 participants at risk
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 3 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 4: VIS954 Dose 4
n=7 participants at risk
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 4 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 5: VIS954 Dose 5
n=7 participants at risk
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 5 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 6: VIS954 Dose 6
n=7 participants at risk
Participants received a single dose of VIS954 at Dose 6 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
Cohort 1 to 6: Pooled Placebo
n=12 participants at risk
Participants received a single dose of placebo matched to VIS954 via SC injection on Day 1.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
General disorders
Injection site reaction
|
0.00%
0/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
0.00%
0/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
0.00%
0/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
14.3%
1/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
28.6%
2/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
14.3%
1/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
25.0%
3/12 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
0.00%
0/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
0.00%
0/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
0.00%
0/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
0.00%
0/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
0.00%
0/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
0.00%
0/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
8.3%
1/12 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Blood loss anaemia
|
0.00%
0/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
14.3%
1/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
0.00%
0/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
0.00%
0/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
0.00%
0/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
0.00%
0/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
0.00%
0/12 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
0.00%
0/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
0.00%
0/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
0.00%
0/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
14.3%
1/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
0.00%
0/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
0.00%
0/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
0.00%
0/12 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
0.00%
0/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
0.00%
0/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
0.00%
0/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
0.00%
0/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
0.00%
0/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
0.00%
0/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
8.3%
1/12 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
|
General disorders
Injection site bruising
|
14.3%
1/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
0.00%
0/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
0.00%
0/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
0.00%
0/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
0.00%
0/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
0.00%
0/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
0.00%
0/12 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
|
General disorders
Injection site pruritus
|
0.00%
0/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
0.00%
0/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
0.00%
0/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
14.3%
1/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
0.00%
0/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
0.00%
0/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
8.3%
1/12 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
0.00%
0/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
0.00%
0/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
0.00%
0/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
0.00%
0/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
14.3%
1/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
0.00%
0/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
0.00%
0/12 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
14.3%
1/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
0.00%
0/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
14.3%
1/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
0.00%
0/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
0.00%
0/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
0.00%
0/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
8.3%
1/12 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinorrhoea
|
0.00%
0/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
0.00%
0/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
0.00%
0/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
0.00%
0/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
0.00%
0/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
14.3%
1/7 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
0.00%
0/12 • From study intervention administration (Day 1) up to end of follow-up (Day 71)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received trial intervention (active or placebo).
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place