PENG Block in Comparison With FICB for Hip Reconstruction in Children

NCT ID: NCT06210503

Last Updated: 2025-07-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

86 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-12-04

Study Completion Date

2025-11-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this clinical trial is to test the hypothesis that performing a Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block allows for more effective analgesia in the perioperative period during reconstructive surgery on the hip in children with cerebral palsy and spina bifida compared with Fascia illiaca compartment block (FICB).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The main question it aims to answer is: Is the PENG block an effective and safe method of pain relief for hip surgery in children? Participants will be randomized into two equal groups. The group who underwent US - guided PENG block, and the group who underwent US - guided FICB . In both groups we used 0.5% ropivacaine. The same postoperative analgesia regimen was applied by intravenous acetaminophen , oral ibuprofen . In case of ineffectiveness of the prescribed drugs, promedol was used intramuscularly. The postoperative consumption of promedol, time to first rescue analgesia, numerical pain score (NRS) (for children from 7 years old), FLACC score, measurements of A.N.I. monitor MDMS and the side effects will be recorded

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Perioperative Analgesia Hip Dislocation, Developmental

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PENG group

The patient will undergo pericapsular nerve blockade with 0.5% ropivacaine based on 3 mg/kg ropivacaine using ultrasound scanning.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Pericapcelar group nerve block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

In the supine position, a high-frequency linear sensor is placed in the anterior superior iliac spine and then aligned with the ramus of the pubis by rotating the probe counterclockwise approximately 45 degrees. The iliopsoas muscle and tendon, femoral artery, and pectineus muscle were observed in this view.The iliopsoas muscle and its tendon are visualized, as well as the vascular and nerve bundle: femoral artery, vein, and nerve. The needle is inserted laterally to medially in a planar approach to place the tip in the musculofascial plane between the psoas tendon anteriorly and the ramus pubis posteriorly. After negative aspiration, local anesthetic will be gradually injected aspirating every 3 mL.

FICB group

The patient will undergo FICB with 0.5% ropivacaine based on 3 mg/kg ropivacaine using ultrasound scanning.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Fascia iliaca compartment block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

In the supine position, a high-frequency linear sensor is placed in the inguinal fold. Scan starting lateral to the femoral artery and the nerve in the inguinal crease to identify the sartorius muscle, tracing the muscle to its origin to the anterior superior iliac spine. A shadow of the iliac crest bone and iliacus muscle will be visible, with the end point of injection being deep in the fascia iliaca and above the iliacus muscle at the lateral aspect of the iliacus muscle. After negative aspiration, local anesthetic will be gradually injected under the fascial plane, aspirating every 3 mL.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Pericapcelar group nerve block

In the supine position, a high-frequency linear sensor is placed in the anterior superior iliac spine and then aligned with the ramus of the pubis by rotating the probe counterclockwise approximately 45 degrees. The iliopsoas muscle and tendon, femoral artery, and pectineus muscle were observed in this view.The iliopsoas muscle and its tendon are visualized, as well as the vascular and nerve bundle: femoral artery, vein, and nerve. The needle is inserted laterally to medially in a planar approach to place the tip in the musculofascial plane between the psoas tendon anteriorly and the ramus pubis posteriorly. After negative aspiration, local anesthetic will be gradually injected aspirating every 3 mL.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Fascia iliaca compartment block

In the supine position, a high-frequency linear sensor is placed in the inguinal fold. Scan starting lateral to the femoral artery and the nerve in the inguinal crease to identify the sartorius muscle, tracing the muscle to its origin to the anterior superior iliac spine. A shadow of the iliac crest bone and iliacus muscle will be visible, with the end point of injection being deep in the fascia iliaca and above the iliacus muscle at the lateral aspect of the iliacus muscle. After negative aspiration, local anesthetic will be gradually injected under the fascial plane, aspirating every 3 mL.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* reconstructive surgery on the hip joint
* children with cerebral palsy/ spina bifida/organic brain injury
* age 3 - 18 years.

Exclusion Criteria

* contraindications to the use of local anesthetics
* contraindications to performing an invasive procedure
* ASA \> 3
Minimum Eligible Age

3 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

17 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Saint Petersburg State University, Russia

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Novikova Veronika

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Saint-Petersburg State University

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Russia

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PENG vs FICB

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

CMP vs Fascia Iliaca Block
NCT04426058 UNKNOWN NA
PENG vs. FIC Blocks in Hip Fractures in the ED
NCT06336460 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA