A Post-marketing Study to Evaluate a Novel Surgical Monitoring Technique Using the EARP Nerve Cuff in TLIF Surgery.
NCT ID: NCT06204900
Last Updated: 2025-02-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-06-07
2025-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The Endoscopic Assisted Retropsoas (EARP) Nerve Cuff Electrode and Retractor surgical and nerve monitoring tools will be used in addition to standard nerve monitoring tools during the surgery. The choice of standard nerve monitoring equipment is based on the decision of the surgeon and technologist and is not dictated by this study.
These tools will be compared with regards to safety and ability to accurately monitor the nervous system during the surgery.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Objective of the Protocol is to Generate Real World Evidence (RWE) Supporting the Safety, Performance, and Health Economics of Using the Regulatory Approved and Commercially Available EARP Interbody System Used During Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LIF) Procedures With the EARP Nerve Cuff Electrode
NCT07020000
Multimodality Neuromonitoring in XLIF
NCT01499680
Advanced XLIF Monitoring Multicenter Study
NCT02272140
Intraoperative Monitoring for the Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Procedure
NCT05648474
Transcutaneous Auricular Neurostimulation After Lumbar Surgery
NCT06100172
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Spontaneous EMG (sEMG) is also used to monitor nerve root activity. While sEMG is an excellent indicator of spinal nerve root manipulation, it is a poor diagnostic indicator of dysfunction. 90-95% of sEMG alerts are not associated with dysfunction yielding a high false positive rate and poor specificity, and postoperative deficits are often not associated with sEMG alerts yielding many false negatives and poor sensitivity. The primary utility of sEMG is to use as an indicator of manipulation, which prompts the acquisition of tcMEPs to assess function.
There is a clear need to take the guesswork out of monitoring the functional status of nerve roots at risk during lumbar decompressions and select interbody fusions. During TLIFs, the exiting nerve root is at risk as it courses obliquely across disc space encroaching on the surgical corridor. Standardly, a hand-held retractor is used to retract and protect the nerve root during disc space preparation, implant insertion or even simple decompression. This maneuver and retraction place a particular nerve root at risk, but again, traditional SSEP and tcMEPs are not ideal for monitoring that risk.
The EARP Nerve Cuff Electrode (Retropsoas Technologies) is a novel, Class II, device that is 510(k) cleared by FDA. It conducts electrical signals as a component of intraoperative neuromonitoring, is used with commercially available neuromonitoring systems, and does not stimulate or record the signal itself. The standard connectors at the proximal end interface with the neuromonitoring equipment. The distal nerve cuff electrode partially encircles and contacts the target nerve root. It uses a bipolar configuration to limit current spread. It is available in several inner diameters to accommodate variability in patient nerve root size anatomy.
The EARP Retractor is a Class I device used with a commercially available Retractor system and is only used as an additional 4th blade.
In TLIF surgery, the exiting nerve must be retracted to allow for sufficient access to the intervertebral disc space. The retraction is applied at the medial portion of the nerve root. The application of this retraction may produce activity in the nerve root and/or conduction changes in the nerve root due to temporary manipulation, compression, or ischemia related to the retraction.1
The objective of the study is to demonstrate the ability to safely monitor lumbar nerve root activity and function during retraction using an Endoscopic Assisted Retropsoas (EARP) Nerve Cuff Electrode and an EARP Retractor system during a standard Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF), with improved specificity and sensitivity over traditional monitoring techniques.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Undergoing a single-level or two-level TLIF between L2-S1
During the surgery, the standard monitoring devices and the EARP monitoring study devices and techniques will be used.
Nerve Cuff and Retractor System
Endoscopic Assisted Retropsoas (EARP) Nerve Cuff Electrode and an EARP Retractor system to safely monitor lumbar nerve root activity and function during a standard Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Nerve Cuff and Retractor System
Endoscopic Assisted Retropsoas (EARP) Nerve Cuff Electrode and an EARP Retractor system to safely monitor lumbar nerve root activity and function during a standard Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Acute lumbar spine trauma requiring immediate intervention
* Allergy or contraindication to propofol
* Lower extremity amputation
* Significant lower extremity edema noted on clinical exam
* Current treatment with chemotherapy, radiation, or immunosuppression
* Pregnant, or plans on becoming pregnant in the near future
* History of allergy to titanium, platinum, aluminum, stainless steel, or silicon
22 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Retropsoas Technologies, LLC
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nicholas Poulos, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Retropsoas Technologies, LLC
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Rothman Orthopaedic Institute
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Allegheny-Singer Research Institute
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
EARP-1-1001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.