A Post-marketing Study to Evaluate a Novel Surgical Monitoring Technique Using the EARP Nerve Cuff in TLIF Surgery.

NCT ID: NCT06204900

Last Updated: 2025-02-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-06-07

Study Completion Date

2025-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the differences (the effectiveness and the safety) between two different nerve and muscle monitoring devices currently available during a TLIF surgery.

The Endoscopic Assisted Retropsoas (EARP) Nerve Cuff Electrode and Retractor surgical and nerve monitoring tools will be used in addition to standard nerve monitoring tools during the surgery. The choice of standard nerve monitoring equipment is based on the decision of the surgeon and technologist and is not dictated by this study.

These tools will be compared with regards to safety and ability to accurately monitor the nervous system during the surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The application of traditional SSEPs and tcMEPs to lumbar nerve root monitoring during TLIF surgery is both challenging and problematic. When applied to lumbar nerve root monitoring, SSEPs and tcMEPs unfortunately suffer in specificity, sensitivity, or both. A surgeon thus cannot confidently rely on these techniques to monitor nerve root function and must guess the likelihood of dysfunction.

Spontaneous EMG (sEMG) is also used to monitor nerve root activity. While sEMG is an excellent indicator of spinal nerve root manipulation, it is a poor diagnostic indicator of dysfunction. 90-95% of sEMG alerts are not associated with dysfunction yielding a high false positive rate and poor specificity, and postoperative deficits are often not associated with sEMG alerts yielding many false negatives and poor sensitivity. The primary utility of sEMG is to use as an indicator of manipulation, which prompts the acquisition of tcMEPs to assess function.

There is a clear need to take the guesswork out of monitoring the functional status of nerve roots at risk during lumbar decompressions and select interbody fusions. During TLIFs, the exiting nerve root is at risk as it courses obliquely across disc space encroaching on the surgical corridor. Standardly, a hand-held retractor is used to retract and protect the nerve root during disc space preparation, implant insertion or even simple decompression. This maneuver and retraction place a particular nerve root at risk, but again, traditional SSEP and tcMEPs are not ideal for monitoring that risk.

The EARP Nerve Cuff Electrode (Retropsoas Technologies) is a novel, Class II, device that is 510(k) cleared by FDA. It conducts electrical signals as a component of intraoperative neuromonitoring, is used with commercially available neuromonitoring systems, and does not stimulate or record the signal itself. The standard connectors at the proximal end interface with the neuromonitoring equipment. The distal nerve cuff electrode partially encircles and contacts the target nerve root. It uses a bipolar configuration to limit current spread. It is available in several inner diameters to accommodate variability in patient nerve root size anatomy.

The EARP Retractor is a Class I device used with a commercially available Retractor system and is only used as an additional 4th blade.

In TLIF surgery, the exiting nerve must be retracted to allow for sufficient access to the intervertebral disc space. The retraction is applied at the medial portion of the nerve root. The application of this retraction may produce activity in the nerve root and/or conduction changes in the nerve root due to temporary manipulation, compression, or ischemia related to the retraction.1

The objective of the study is to demonstrate the ability to safely monitor lumbar nerve root activity and function during retraction using an Endoscopic Assisted Retropsoas (EARP) Nerve Cuff Electrode and an EARP Retractor system during a standard Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF), with improved specificity and sensitivity over traditional monitoring techniques.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Undergoing a single-level or two-level TLIF between L2-S1

During the surgery, the standard monitoring devices and the EARP monitoring study devices and techniques will be used.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Nerve Cuff and Retractor System

Intervention Type DEVICE

Endoscopic Assisted Retropsoas (EARP) Nerve Cuff Electrode and an EARP Retractor system to safely monitor lumbar nerve root activity and function during a standard Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Nerve Cuff and Retractor System

Endoscopic Assisted Retropsoas (EARP) Nerve Cuff Electrode and an EARP Retractor system to safely monitor lumbar nerve root activity and function during a standard Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF).

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

• Undergoing TLIF between L2-S1

Exclusion Criteria

* Requiring TLIF surgery only at the L5-S1 level
* Acute lumbar spine trauma requiring immediate intervention
* Allergy or contraindication to propofol
* Lower extremity amputation
* Significant lower extremity edema noted on clinical exam
* Current treatment with chemotherapy, radiation, or immunosuppression
* Pregnant, or plans on becoming pregnant in the near future
* History of allergy to titanium, platinum, aluminum, stainless steel, or silicon
Minimum Eligible Age

22 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Retropsoas Technologies, LLC

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nicholas Poulos, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Retropsoas Technologies, LLC

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Rothman Orthopaedic Institute

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Allegheny-Singer Research Institute

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Nicholas Poulos, M.D.

Role: CONTACT

(618) 402-0035

Greg Ambra

Role: CONTACT

(732) 595-7508

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Principal investigator

Role: primary

800-321-9999

Principal investigator

Role: primary

(412) 359-6965

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EARP-1-1001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

LUMBAR & SACROILIAC FUSION STUDY
NCT07204288 RECRUITING NA
3Spine Lumbar Fusion Real World Evidence Study
NCT04823858 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
MIS MiLIF Versus Open
NCT00792129 COMPLETED
CONDUIT vs. PEEK Cages
NCT06904898 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA