Patient Outcomes With Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT ID: NCT06203756
Last Updated: 2025-05-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
NA
713 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-11-09
2040-04-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Post-Market Study of Robotic-Arm Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT03106558
Survivorship and Outcomes of Robotic-Arm Assisted Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
NCT03668717
Survivorship and Outcomes of Robotic-Arm Assisted Bicompartmental Arthroplasty
NCT03668704
Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Robot-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT06856356
Clinical Outcomes of Joint Arthroplasty
NCT03668691
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Prospective data will be collected for this Post Market Clinical Follow up (PMCF) study and the data will be fed into the Post-Market Surveillance (PMS) and Clinical Evaluation processes of the devices under assessment on annual basis and support presentations at orthopaedic congresses and/or peer-reviewed publication(s).
Participants will be selected for recruitment into the study from the general population of participants requiring a primary or revision knee-arthroplasty and considered suitable to receive the Apex Knee System.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SEQUENTIAL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
Sensor-assisted robotic surgery cohort with a tibia first workflow. Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty components.
Omnibotics Robotic-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty with Apex Revision
Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty with a tibial first workflow using the BalanceBot to characterize soft tissue balance, and the Apex Revision knee implant type
Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty
Sensor-assisted robotic surgery cohort with a tibia first workflow. Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty
Omnibotics Robotic-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty with Apex UC
Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty in femur and tibial first workflows using the BalanceBot to characterize soft tissue balance, and the Apex UltraCongruent (UC) knee implant type
Omnibotics Robotic-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty with Apex PS
Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty with a tibial first workflow using the BalanceBot to characterize soft tissue balance, and the Apex PosteriorStabilized (PS) knee implant type
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Omnibotics Robotic-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty with Apex UC
Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty in femur and tibial first workflows using the BalanceBot to characterize soft tissue balance, and the Apex UltraCongruent (UC) knee implant type
Omnibotics Robotic-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty with Apex PS
Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty with a tibial first workflow using the BalanceBot to characterize soft tissue balance, and the Apex PosteriorStabilized (PS) knee implant type
Omnibotics Robotic-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty with Apex Revision
Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty with a tibial first workflow using the BalanceBot to characterize soft tissue balance, and the Apex Revision knee implant type
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patient is able and willing to sign the informed consent and follow study procedures
3. Patient's joint must be anatomically and functionally suited to receive the selected implant and accommodate use of the robotic assistance
Exclusion Criteria
2. Significant neurological or musculoskeletal disorders or disease that may interfere with total knee arthroplasty survival, adversely affect gait or weight bearing, (i.e. Paget's disease, Charcot's disease, muscular dystrophy, multiple sclerosis).
3. The presence of highly communicable disease or diseases that may limit follow-up (e.g. immuno-compromised conditions, hepatitis, active tuberculosis, HIV, etc.).
4. Presence of known active metastatic or neoplastic disease.
5. Cancer patients unless they have received curative treatment and have no evidence of recurrence for 5 years.
6. Patient has a mental condition that may interfere with the subject's ability to give an informed consent or willingness to fulfill the study requirements (i.e., severe mental retardation such that the Subject cannot understand the informed consent process, global dementia, prior strokes that interfere with the Subject's cognitive abilities, senile dementia, and Alzheimer's Disease).
7. Patient has an active infection or joint sepsis.
8. Patient has muscular, neurological or vascular deficiencies which compromise the affected extremity (i.e., Parkinson's Disease, Multiple Sclerosis, and Charcot joints).
9. Patients with allergies or suspected sensitivity to any patient-contacting component of the implant to be used in the study Has known sensitivity to implants or the materials in the device including but not limited to: Ti, Al, V, Co, Cr, Mo, Ni and Si3N4.).
10. Patients who are currently on medical leave from their employment due to Worker's Compensation.
11. Patients who are at high risk for poor healing or confounding outcomes or at excessive risk for surgery (e.g., clinically significant/being actively treated for renal, hepatic, cardiac, hematologic, or neurologic disease or poorly controlled diabetes (HbA1c \> 8 mg/dL) or previous history of joint infection).
12. Patients who are known drug or alcohol abusers or with psychological disorders as defined by DSM V that could affect follow-up care or treatment outcomes.
13. Patients who are currently involved in another clinical study with an investigational device.
14. Patients with current litigation pending related to medical treatment of any sort.
15. Patients, who, in the opinion of the investigator, will not be able to complete the study per the protocol.
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Corin
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jan A Koenig, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
NYU LANGONE-LONG ISLAND
Jeffrey H DeClaire, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
DeClaire LaMacchia Orthopaedic Institute
Amber Randall, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Granite Orthopaedics
Corey Ponder, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Oklahoma Sports and Orthopedics Institute
John Keggi, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Orthopaedics New England
Jeffrey Lawrence, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Gundersen Lutheran Medical Foundation, Inc
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Flagstaff Bone and Joint
Flagstaff, Arizona, United States
Orthopaedics New England
Middlebury, Connecticut, United States
DeClaire LaMacchia Orthopaedic Institute
Rochester, Michigan, United States
Nyu Langone-Long Island
Garden City, New York, United States
Oklahoma Sports and Orthopedics Institute
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Gundersen Health System
La Crosse, Wisconsin, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CSP-2017-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.