DEprescribing: Perceptions of PAtients Living With Advanced Cancer
NCT ID: NCT06193083
Last Updated: 2025-06-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
325 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-02-28
2026-12-29
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Recently, palliative care initiatives have been introduced, but without having studied the potential specificities of this population (younger, with a different care dynamic and life trajectory). It is important to better understand this population's perceptions of deprescribing in order to adapt tools/actions to make these approaches more efficient.
The primary aim of this study is to investigate patients' perceptions of deprescribing in palliative cancer care, and the secondary aim is to investigate factors that may influence patients' attitudes and beliefs about deprescribing. At the same time, we will study the psychometric properties of the rPATD (Revised Patients' Attitudes Towards Deprescribing) in this population (a standardized questionnaire validated in geriatric medicine to assess patients' perceptions of deprescription).An ancillary study will be carried out to investigate the link between patients' health literacy and their perception of deprescribing (health literacy is defined as the ability to acquire, understand and use information in ways that promote and maintain good health).
To meet our objectives, we will conduct a 3-year national, prospective, observational, multicenter study with an exploratory sequential mixed design. The study will comprise an initial qualitative phase. Semi-directed individual interviews using a descriptive approach will be carried out (around 25 patients, over an 8-month period). Following analysis of the qualitative data, we will then carry out a quantitative study to determine the distribution of the different profiles within this population and the factors influencing the perception of deprescription. The self-administered questionnaires, rPATD and BMQ (medication beliefs questionnaire), potentially supplemented by other items following analysis of the qualitative data, will be administered to 300 patients (over a 12-month period).The ancillary study will be carried out during this second phase, using a validated self-questionnaire to assess patients' level of literacy.
Thanks to the different results, we will improve our knowledge of the perception of deprescription in palliative oncology care, in order to develop approaches adapted to the specificities of our population to reduce polymedication and thus improve the quality of life of our patients and reduce the risks of iatrogenia.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Perceptions of Health Professionals Confronted With Palliative Situations
NCT03021967
Advance Care Planning in Palliative Care
NCT05662917
Comparison Between the Assessment of Anxious and Depressive Symptomology
NCT04148924
Early Intervention vs. Standard Palliative Care in Improving End-of-Life Care in Advanced Cancer Patients
NCT00253383
Assessment of the Reasons for Accepting or Refusing Early Palliative Care
NCT04717440
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Qualitative study
The study will comprise an initial qualitative phase. Semi-directed individual interviews using a descriptive approach will be carried out (around 25 patients, over an 8-month period).
Semi-directed individual interviews
Individual semi-structured interviews (descriptive approach methodology with reflexive thematic analysis)
Quantitative study
Following analysis of the qualitative data, we will then carry out a quantitative study to determine the distribution of the different profiles within this population and the factors influencing the perception of deprescription. The self-administered questionnaires, rPATD and BMQ (medication beliefs questionnaire), potentially supplemented by other items following analysis of the qualitative data, will be administered to 300 patients (over a 12-month period).
The ancillary study will be carried out during this second phase, using a validated self-questionnaire to assess patients' level of literacy.
The self-administered questionnaires, rPATD and BMQ
rPATD: The rPATD is a questionnaire validated and adapted in French to assess patients' perceptions of their treatments and deprescribing.
This self-administered questionnaire consists of 22 questions rated on a 5-point Likert scale (scale from 1 to 5, at 1 the patient completely agrees with the questionnaire's proposal, at 5 the patient strongly disagrees with the questionnaire's proposal). Following the analysis of Phase 1 "Qualitative" of the protocol, three additional questions
BMQ French version of the BMQ self-questionnaire, which studies patients' perceptions of medication .
The Beliefs about Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ) is an 18-item self-administered questionnaire designed to explore patient perceptions of medicine. It has been validated in French and is free to use.
It comprises 10 items relating to specific beliefs about prescribed treatments:
A 5-point Likert-type scale was used for each item. The higher the sum of the scores obtained, the stronger the subject's belief.
The self-administered FCCHL (Functional, Communicative and Critical Health Literacy) / HLS14 (14-item health literacy scale)
FCCHL (Functional, Communicative and Critical Health Literacy)/HLS14 (14-item health literacy scale) (https://reflis.fr/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/FCCHL-HLS14-Questionnaire-Litteratie-sante.pdf )
Validated French-language self-administered questionnaire and consisting of14 items with a 5-point Likert scale for assessing health literacy :
Functional literacy: basic reading and writing skills sufficient to function effectively in everyday situations Communicative or interactive literacy: more advanced cognitive and literacy skills that, combined with social skills, can be used to actively participate in everyday activities, extract information and meanings from different forms of communication, and apply new information to changing circumstances Critical literacy: more advanced cognitive skills which, combined with social skills, can be applied to the critical analysis of information and the use of that information to exercise greater control over life events and situations
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Semi-directed individual interviews
Individual semi-structured interviews (descriptive approach methodology with reflexive thematic analysis)
The self-administered questionnaires, rPATD and BMQ
rPATD: The rPATD is a questionnaire validated and adapted in French to assess patients' perceptions of their treatments and deprescribing.
This self-administered questionnaire consists of 22 questions rated on a 5-point Likert scale (scale from 1 to 5, at 1 the patient completely agrees with the questionnaire's proposal, at 5 the patient strongly disagrees with the questionnaire's proposal). Following the analysis of Phase 1 "Qualitative" of the protocol, three additional questions
BMQ French version of the BMQ self-questionnaire, which studies patients' perceptions of medication .
The Beliefs about Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ) is an 18-item self-administered questionnaire designed to explore patient perceptions of medicine. It has been validated in French and is free to use.
It comprises 10 items relating to specific beliefs about prescribed treatments:
A 5-point Likert-type scale was used for each item. The higher the sum of the scores obtained, the stronger the subject's belief.
The self-administered FCCHL (Functional, Communicative and Critical Health Literacy) / HLS14 (14-item health literacy scale)
FCCHL (Functional, Communicative and Critical Health Literacy)/HLS14 (14-item health literacy scale) (https://reflis.fr/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/FCCHL-HLS14-Questionnaire-Litteratie-sante.pdf )
Validated French-language self-administered questionnaire and consisting of14 items with a 5-point Likert scale for assessing health literacy :
Functional literacy: basic reading and writing skills sufficient to function effectively in everyday situations Communicative or interactive literacy: more advanced cognitive and literacy skills that, combined with social skills, can be used to actively participate in everyday activities, extract information and meanings from different forms of communication, and apply new information to changing circumstances Critical literacy: more advanced cognitive skills which, combined with social skills, can be applied to the critical analysis of information and the use of that information to exercise greater control over life events and situations
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Locally advanced or metastatic solid cancer (i.e., palliative care as defined by the World Health Organization)
* Life expectancy estimated by the physician at inclusion of less than 1 year (use of surprise question to help clinician estimate life expectancy)
* Hospitalized or in consultation
* With at least one PIMs (identified using STOPPfrail 2)
* Patient not having expressed opposition to participating in the study after receiving information from the physician.
For qualitative study patients :
\- Patients who have signed an authorization for the recording of their voice during the semi-structured interview for the purpose of written transcription.
Exclusion Criteria
* Major under guardianship, protected person
* Patient unable to speak or write French
* Patient with impaired judgment, cognitive or sensory impairment that prevents him/her from receiving informed information, answering questionnaires or participating in a study interview.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Fondation de France
OTHER
Nantes Université
UNKNOWN
Nantes University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Adrien EVIN
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Nantes University Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHD Vendée
La Roche-sur-Yon, , France
CHU de Nantes
Nantes, , France
Hôpital Institut CURIE
Paris, , France
Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest
Saint-Herblain, , France
CH ST Nazaire
Saint-Nazaire, , France
CHRU Tours
Tours, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Evin A, Bourdon M, Nizet P, Hardouin JB, Victorri-Vigneau C, Huon JF. DEprescribing: Perceptions of PAtients living with advanced cancer. A multicentre, prospective mixed observational study protocol. PLoS One. 2024 Aug 20;19(8):e0305737. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305737. eCollection 2024.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RC23_0563
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.