Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
88 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-01-01
2024-08-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparing Post-operative Analgesia After (PECS II) Block and (ESPB) in Modified Radical Mastectomy
NCT06714682
Combined PECS II and Transeversus Thoracic Plane Blocks Vs Serratus Anterior Plane Block in Modified Radical Mastectomy
NCT04908878
Comparing the Quality of Analgesia With Pectoral Nerve Block and Serratus Plane Block in Modified Radical Mastectomy
NCT05224310
Direct Versus US Guided PECS Block on Controlling Postmastectomy Pain
NCT05825430
Comparative Study Between Combined Modified Pectoral Nerve Block (PECSΙΙ) and Transversus Thoracic Plane Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block for Post-operative Analgesia Following Breast Surgeries, (randomized Clinical Trial Study)
NCT06783764
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The PECS II block involves the injection of local anesthetic between the pectoralis minor and serratus anterior muscles, targeting the pectoral nerves and lateral cutaneous branches of intercostal nerves (T2-T6). It is widely used for anterior chest wall analgesia after breast surgery. The MTP block, a more recent paravertebral-domain technique, deposits anesthetic midway between the transverse process and the pleura, allowing spread to dorsal and ventral rami via the superior costotransverse ligament and potentially achieving broader thoracic segment coverage.
This randomized trial evaluates postoperative pain control using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) over 24 hours, along with opioid consumption and adverse events. The aim is to determine whether the MTP block offers superior analgesia and an opioid-sparing effect compared to the PECS II block.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
PECS II block group
Forty-four female patients (ASA I-II, 40-65 years) scheduled for modified radical mastectomy received an ultrasound-guided PECS II block with 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine (10 mL between pectoralis major and minor; 10 mL between pectoralis minor and serratus anterior).
PECS II BLOCK
In the supine position, as described by Blanco et al., the ultrasound probe was placed transversely beneath the clavicle. After identifying the intermuscular plane between the pectoralis major and minor, 10 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine was injected. The probe was then repositioned laterally to identify the plane between the pectoralis minor and serratus anterior at the third to fourth ribs, where a further 10 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine was injected.
MTP block group
Forty-four female patients (ASA I-II, 40-65 years) scheduled for modified radical mastectomy received an ultrasound-guided midpoint transverse process to pleura (MTP) block with 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine (10 mL injected at T2 and 10 mL at T6).
MTP BLOCK
The block was performed with the patient in a seated position. The ultrasound probe was positioned parasagittally, approximately 3 cm lateral to the midline, at the T2 and T6 vertebral levels. A 22-gauge needle was advanced in-plane to the midpoint between the transverse process and pleura, and 10 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine was injected at each level. This protocol was adapted from the original technique described by Bhoi et al., with modifications in injection levels and volume.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PECS II BLOCK
In the supine position, as described by Blanco et al., the ultrasound probe was placed transversely beneath the clavicle. After identifying the intermuscular plane between the pectoralis major and minor, 10 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine was injected. The probe was then repositioned laterally to identify the plane between the pectoralis minor and serratus anterior at the third to fourth ribs, where a further 10 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine was injected.
MTP BLOCK
The block was performed with the patient in a seated position. The ultrasound probe was positioned parasagittally, approximately 3 cm lateral to the midline, at the T2 and T6 vertebral levels. A 22-gauge needle was advanced in-plane to the midpoint between the transverse process and pleura, and 10 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine was injected at each level. This protocol was adapted from the original technique described by Bhoi et al., with modifications in injection levels and volume.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Age between 40 and 65 years.
3. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Coagulopathy.
3. Infection at the site of injection.
4. Patient refusal.
5. Inability to understand or use the pain scale.
40 Years
65 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ain Shams University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ahmed abdelghany Khalifa ragab
lecturer of Anesthesia, intensive care and pain management
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ahmed A. Khalifa, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Ain Shams University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ain Shams University
Cairo, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
FMASU MD311/2023
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.