Augmented Reality Serious Game Design for Promoting Children's Science Education Cognition

NCT ID: NCT06184022

Last Updated: 2023-12-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

18 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-05-01

Study Completion Date

2022-09-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background:The process of constructing knowledge in the context of children's science education plays a significant role in fostering the development of early scientific literacy. Nevertheless, children sometimes struggle to comprehend scientific knowledge due to the presence of abstract notions.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of augmented reality (AR) games as a teaching tool for enhancing children's understanding of optical science education.

Methods: 36 healthy children between the ages of 6 and 8 years old were included in this study. Individuals were randomly divided into an intervention group (n=18) and a control group (n=18). Interventions, namely a 20-minute AR science education including three game lesson modules, while the control group was asked to learn 20-minute same knowledge with non-AR science learning app. POE (predict-observe-explain) test of 3 games including animal vision, color-light mixing and light refraction were conducted for all participants before and after the experiment. Also, intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI) test including interest-enjoyment (INT-ENJ), perceived competence (COMP), effort-importance (EFF-IMP), and tension-pressure (TEN-PRESS) were conducted for children after the experiment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Guardians of children with independent mobility provided informed written consent for their participation in the study. Participants were randomly assigned to the experimental and control groups using a randomization list maintained by members of the study group uninvolved in any other aspect of the research. Participants' guardians received and opened opaque, sealed envelopes containing group assignments following the initial evaluation. The evaluator in charge of assessing the results of the AR scientific education course had no access to participant information or group assignment.

Sample size calculations were performed using PASS based on the POE test scores from the pre-experiment. Group sample sizes of 18 and 18 achieve 90.118% power to reject the null hypothesis of equal means when the population mean difference is μ1 - μ2 = 3.2- 1.0 = 2.2 with a standard deviation (SD) for two groups of 2.0 and 1.9, and with a significance level (a) of 0.050 using a bilateral, two-sample, equal-variance t-test.

This experiment was a randomized controlled trial, and the participants were randomly separated into the experimental group and the control group. The random numbers were generated by applying SAS software analysis system on computer simulation, and no experimental group was allowed to be selected at random. Every child was tested in the company of a guardian and two experimentalists.

The independent variable was the type of game ("Light and Color", a light science educational product and AR game we designed). The independent variable was the type of game ("Light and Color", a light science educational product and AR game that we created). The dependent variables for both experimental and control group students were the difference between the pre- and post-test results of the POE test and the children's motivation to play the game. To create control variables for the experiment, both games were based on animal vision, light transmission, and color-light mixing, and neither game involved the teacher. In addition, there were no significant gender or age differences between the two student groups.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Educational Problems Augmented Reality Serious Game

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

augmented reality serious game science education

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Augmented reality serious game

Before the test started, the experimenter gave the basic information of the experiment to the participants. The participants were requested to complete a cognitive exam on the notion of light, and were asked to perform a POE test for each question. The experimental group utilized the three game lesson modules of the AR science education app designed for this study, including "Animals vision," " Light transmission," and "Color-Light mixing". On their initial encounter with the game, respondents were given around 10 minutes to comprehend its mechanics. The experimental group's total learning time was limited to 20 minutes, the testing process was completed under the supervision of the instructor and the experimenter. During the experiment, the participants were not disturbed in any way; researchers only intervened when they faced difficulties or requested assistance. The participants were given a 15-minute respite at the conclusion of the trial to take another POE test.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Augmented reality serious game design for promoting children's science education cognition:

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

The experimental group utilized the three game lesson modules of the AR science education app designed for this study, including "Animals vision," " Light transmission," and "Color-Light mixing".

The experimental group's total learning time was limited to 20 minutes, the testing process was completed under the supervision of the instructor and the experimenter, and the children's behavioral characteristics were recorded. During the experiment, the participants were not disturbed in any way; researchers only intervened when they faced difficulties or requested assistance. The participants were given a 15-minute respite at the conclusion of the trial to take another POE test. Before and after the intervention, each participant's performance on the game was recorded.

non-ar serious game

The control group completed the same three game courses for a maximum of 20 minutes using the non-AR app "Light and Color" after completing the pre-test.For the non-AR game we used "Light and Color" designed by Tinybop available in Appstore Tools for young artists and scientists. Both games have the same scientific educational content on optics (in fact, to experiment with control variables, we adopted the same scientific knowledge as in this non-AR app at the stage of designing the content), so it is possible to perform a POE test. The participants took a 15-minute break at the conclusion of the trial to complete another POE test and the IMI scale.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Augmented reality serious game design for promoting children's science education cognition:

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

The experimental group utilized the three game lesson modules of the AR science education app designed for this study, including "Animals vision," " Light transmission," and "Color-Light mixing".

The experimental group's total learning time was limited to 20 minutes, the testing process was completed under the supervision of the instructor and the experimenter, and the children's behavioral characteristics were recorded. During the experiment, the participants were not disturbed in any way; researchers only intervened when they faced difficulties or requested assistance. The participants were given a 15-minute respite at the conclusion of the trial to take another POE test. Before and after the intervention, each participant's performance on the game was recorded.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Augmented reality serious game design for promoting children's science education cognition:

The experimental group utilized the three game lesson modules of the AR science education app designed for this study, including "Animals vision," " Light transmission," and "Color-Light mixing".

The experimental group's total learning time was limited to 20 minutes, the testing process was completed under the supervision of the instructor and the experimenter, and the children's behavioral characteristics were recorded. During the experiment, the participants were not disturbed in any way; researchers only intervened when they faced difficulties or requested assistance. The participants were given a 15-minute respite at the conclusion of the trial to take another POE test. Before and after the intervention, each participant's performance on the game was recorded.

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

AR serious game

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* native Chinese children (6-8 years old)
* Clear cognition

Exclusion Criteria

* Poor listening and comprehension abilities
Minimum Eligible Age

6 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

8 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

zhudian

Dr

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Zhao Liu, Prof

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dian Zhu

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Sjtu0009

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id