Supraclavicular Bupivacaine Vs. Supraclavicular Liposomal Bupivacaine for Orthopedic Wrist Surgery
NCT ID: NCT06179004
Last Updated: 2025-10-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
PHASE3
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-04-10
2026-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Bupivacaine and Exparel for Carpal Tunnel Release
NCT02141178
Early Post-Operative Pain Control Following Wrist Operations
NCT02052180
Evaluation of Diaphragmatic Function After Interscalene Block With Liposomal Bupivacaine
NCT07263295
Liposomal Bupivacaine in Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT03541265
Analgesic Effect of Liposomal Bupivacaine
NCT05118399
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Participants: Adult participants age \> 18 undergoing orthopedic wrist surgery at the University of North Carolina ambulatory surgery center and University of North Carolina Hillsborough campus Exclusion Criteria: the below are simply contraindications to regional anesthesia in general, this is a pragmatic study to evaluate the quality of care for these subjects with no additional exclusion criteria.- Contraindications to regional anesthesia- Significant peripheral neuropathy or neurological disorder affecting the upper extremity- Pregnancy- Cognitive or psychiatric condition that might affect patient assessment and/or inability to provide informed consent.
Procedures (methods): This is a prospective, randomized comparison of participants undergoing orthopedic wrist procedures that receive one of two types of supraclavicular nerve block. Group 1 will be comprised of patients with a preoperative supraclavicular nerve block placed with 20 mL 0.5% bupivacaine. Group 2 will be comprised of participants with a preoperative supraclavicular nerve block placed with 10 mL 0.5% bupivacaine and 10 mL 1.3% Liposomal Bupivacaine (Exparel). All subjects in both groups will have a similar intraoperative general anesthetic with multimodal analgesic pre-op oral medications. Outcomes measured by Post anesthesia care unit assessment and telephone follow up: see uploaded data collection form.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Supraclavicular Liposomal Bupivacaine group
This group will receive the liposomal bupivacaine
Liposomal bupivacaine
133mg Liposomal bupivacaine plus 10mL 0.5% bupivacaine administered in a supraclavicular single shot perineural injection
Supraclavicular Plain Bupivacaine group
This group will receive the plain bupivacaine
Bupivacaine Hydrochloride
20mL 0.25% bupivacaine administered in a supraclavicular single shot perineural injection
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Liposomal bupivacaine
133mg Liposomal bupivacaine plus 10mL 0.5% bupivacaine administered in a supraclavicular single shot perineural injection
Bupivacaine Hydrochloride
20mL 0.25% bupivacaine administered in a supraclavicular single shot perineural injection
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Scheduled for orthopedic wrist surgery at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Exclusion Criteria
* Emergent surgery Open fractures will be treated emergently and will not allow adequate lead time for enrollment in this study. Also, open fractures are usually accompanied by other traumatic injuries that would confound the pain related outcomes in this study.
* Significant peripheral neuropathy or neurological disorder affecting the upper extremity
* Pregnancy Pregnant women have physiologic changes that make them more sensitive to local anesthetics. That would introduce a confounding element in interpreting the effectiveness of the peripheral nerve blocks being studied.
* Cognitive or psychiatric condition that might affect patient assessment and/or inability to provide informed consent.
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jay Schoenherr, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
UNC Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Abell DJ, Barrington MJ. Pneumothorax after ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block: presenting features, risk, and related training. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2014 Mar-Apr;39(2):164-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000045.
Brown CA, Ghanouni A, Williams R, Payne SH, Ghareeb PA. Safety and Efficacy of Liposomal Bupivacaine Supraclavicular Nerve Blocks in Open Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures: A Perioperative Pain Management Protocol. Ann Plast Surg. 2023 Jun 1;90(6S Suppl 4):S332-S336. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003464. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
Hussain N, Brull R, Sheehy B, Essandoh MK, Stahl DL, Weaver TE, Abdallah FW. Perineural Liposomal Bupivacaine Is Not Superior to Nonliposomal Bupivacaine for Peripheral Nerve Block Analgesia. Anesthesiology. 2021 Feb 1;134(2):147-164. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003651.
Myles PS, Shulman MA, Reilly J, Kasza J, Romero L. Measurement of quality of recovery after surgery using the 15-item quality of recovery scale: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2022 Jun;128(6):1029-1039. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.03.009. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
Rundgren J, Mellstrand Navarro C, Ponzer S, Regberg A, Serenius S, Enocson A. Regional or General Anesthesia in the Surgical Treatment of Distal Radial Fractures: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Jul 3;101(13):1168-1176. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00984.
Schoenherr JW, Gonzalez M, Serrano R, Park M, Lee Z, Cobb K, Howard C, Flynn D, Li Q, Grant S, Bullard T. Quality of Recovery After Rotator Cuff Repair With Interscalene Liposomal Bupivacaine Versus Interscalene Nerve Catheter. Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 Nov 22;10(11):23259671221134819. doi: 10.1177/23259671221134819. eCollection 2022 Nov.
Chazapis M, Walker EM, Rooms MA, Kamming D, Moonesinghe SR. Measuring quality of recovery-15 after day case surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2016 Feb;116(2):241-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev413.
D'Souza RS, Johnson RL. Supraclavicular Block. [Updated 2023 Jan 8]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK519056/
Myles PS, Myles DB, Galagher W, Chew C, MacDonald N, Dennis A. Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Three Quality of Recovery Scales. Anesthesiology. 2016 Jul;125(1):39-45. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001158.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
23-1116
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.