RADA16 for Reducing Drain Output Trajectory Following Neck Dissection
NCT ID: NCT06178237
Last Updated: 2023-12-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
208 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-03-31
2026-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The investigators hypothesise that Purabond will reduce the duration for which neck drains must be left in place after neck dissection, which is an operation to remove lymph nodes from the neck. Following neck dissection, fluid can leak into the healing tissues in the neck from very small damaged blood vessels - when an excess of this fluid builds up underneath the skin this is called a seroma. This occurs in 1.3-7% of patients and represents a potential area for infection as well as a noticeable lump. Readmission is sometimes required in the event of an infected seroma though there is no published evidence on how common this is. Drains are placed during neck dissection surgery to remove this fluid and to also reduce the overall seroma rate. Drains are left in until the volume of fluid being produced decreases. The duration for which drains are left in place is also affected by the development of other, rarer complications - specifically chyle leak, anastomotic leak, and pharyngocutaneous fistula. In the setting of any of the above, drains are often left in for longer to ensure any fluid that accumulates is removed and that dead space in the neck is kept to a minimum.
This study aims to assess if Purabond can speed up the process of removing drains. The fluid that makes up a seroma leaks out from damaged blood vessels in the same way a haematoma (collection of blood in the neck) does but the vessels of interest in a seroma are smaller and more numerous - manual ligation of these is not feasible. As Purabond forms a matrix in response to ionic fluids (including seroma) it is expected to reduce the rate of seroma by sealing such vessels. The benefits of this would be reduced duration of stay in hospital for patients with otherwise uncomplicated neck dissections but also reducing infection risk to patients with more complex needs who could otherwise have their drains removed earlier. It would also be expected to reduce the subsequent need for readmission and aspiration of seroma. These findings would then be more broadly applicable to less extensive neck surgeries where there is a risk of seroma but drains are not placed frequently (parotidectomy, thyroidectomy, etc).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Standard of care
Standard of care post-neck dissection
No interventions assigned to this group
Standard of care plus Purabond
Standard of care post-neck dissection plus Purabond
Purabond
Application of Purabond to surgical field
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Purabond
Application of Purabond to surgical field
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Over 18 years of age.
* Able to give informed consent.
18 Years
100 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Royal College of Surgeons, Ireland
OTHER
St. James's Hospital, Ireland
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Gerard Sexton
Specialist Registrar in Otolaryngology
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
000117
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id