Safety and Efficacy of LPE in Clearing DSA in Patients Who Received Allo-HSCT
NCT ID: NCT06177561
Last Updated: 2023-12-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
38 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-11-09
2025-11-08
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Sample the peripheral blood of the patient at four timepoints(Before LPE treatment (D0); Before stem cell transfusion; On the 10th day of stem cell transfusion;On the 30th day of stem cell transfusion).Using multiplex bead analysis on the Luminex platform (Luminex Corporation, Austin, TX, USA), including the LAB screening PRA and LAB screening hybrid method, all patients' ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA)-treated serum was tested for anti-HLA class I and class II antibodies.According to the manufacturer's instructions, the semi-quantitative measurement of DSA levels was performed by LAB screening single antigen beads assay (One Lambda; ThermoFisher), and the results were expressed as MFI.The cumulative DSA MFI was calculated by summing the MFI of all detected DSA under HLA antigen resolution.
Evaluate the effectiveness of LPE by comparing it with the historical control group that has undergone TPE treatment in the past
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
LPE group
1. Serum DSA positive: MFI ≥ 2000;Between the ages of 18 and 65, male and female are not limited;Planned to undergo allo-HSCT , with an estimated survival time of\>3 months and an ECOG physical fitness score of 0-2;Normal renal function (BUN, Cr ≤ 1.5 times the upper limit of normal value, Ccr\>80ml/min)
2. Normal liver function (defined as ALT and AST ≤ 1.5 times the upper limit of normal
3. TBiL ≤ 1.5 times the upper limit of normal)
4. ECG did not indicate any AMI, arrhythmia, or IAVB
5. No CI (defined as LVEF ≥ 50%, normal MYO and BNP)
6. Non active RHD
7. Chest X-ray or physical examination did not indicate cardiac dilatation
8. Normal lung function (defined as FEV1, FVC, DLCO ≥ 60% predicted value).
Lymphoplasma exchange
The LPE treatment regimen is: LPE\*2 times (20-30ml/kg, treatment interval of 2 days);CD20 monoclonal antibody 375mg/m2\*2 times, gamma globulin 0.4g/kg/d\*5d.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Lymphoplasma exchange
The LPE treatment regimen is: LPE\*2 times (20-30ml/kg, treatment interval of 2 days);CD20 monoclonal antibody 375mg/m2\*2 times, gamma globulin 0.4g/kg/d\*5d.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Normal liver function (defined as ALT and AST ≤ 1.5 times the upper limit of normal
3. TBiL ≤ 1.5 times the upper limit of normal)
4. ECG did not indicate any AMI, arrhythmia, or IAVB
5. No CI (defined as LVEF ≥ 50%, normal MYO and BNP)
6. Non active RHD
7. Chest X-ray or physical examination did not indicate cardiac dilatation
8. Normal lung function (defined as FEV1, FVC, DLCO ≥ 60% predicted value)
Exclusion Criteria
2. The following comorbidities exist: active infection patients, active rheumatism patients
3. Patients with secondary immunoglobulin deficiency
4. Serious damage to important organ functions, such as respiratory failure, heart failure, decompensated liver dysfunction, renal dysfunction, etc
5. Unable to obtain informed consent.
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ruijin Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Xiaoxia Hu, Dr
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Ruijin Hospital
Xuefeng Wang, Dr
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Ruijin Hospital
Zilu Zhang, Dr
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Ruijin Hospital
Xiaohong Cai, Dr
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Ruijin Hospital
Xi Wu, Dr
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Ruijin Hospital
Jialu Zhao, bachelor
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Ruijin Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ruijin Hospital
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Jiaming Li, Dr
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RuijinLjm1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id