Preventive TREatment of Dry Eye in Patients Receiving Repeated Intravitreal Injections for Age-related Macular Degeneration

NCT ID: NCT06174181

Last Updated: 2025-02-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

42 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-10-09

Study Completion Date

2024-11-14

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the 1st cause of visual impairment after the age of 50. Its most aggressive form, wet AMD, requires regular intravitreal injections (IVI) spaced 4 to 8 weeks apart usually depending on the treatment regimen and the patient's response. The IVI procedure requires a double disinfection with periocular and conjunctival cutaneous povidone-iodine. Antiseptic agents such as povidone iodine are a highly likely factor in the development of dry eye syndrome. Clinical data have demonstrated the abrasive and toxic effects of their use on the ocular surface, especially with repeated exposure (Saedon H, Nosek J, Phillips J. Ocular surface effects of repeated application of povisoden-iodine in patients receiving frequent intravitreal injections. Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology. 2017;36(4):343-6.). The IVIS study coordinated by Prof. Dot reported impaired ocular surface and quality of life immediately after IVI. The authors suggest 3 levels of action to improve immediate tolerance: (i) improve the basal status of the ocular surface, (ii) reduce the contact time with povidone-iodine which could be toxic to the ocular surface and (iii) improve immediate post-IVI treatment. (Verrecchia S et al. A prospective multicentre study of intravitreal injections and ocular surface in 219 patients: IVIS study. Acta Ophthalmol. 2021 Mar 18). This study is part of the extension of the IVIS study. IVIs are effective and do not currently present a therapeutic alternative. However, their role in the development or exacerbation of dry eye is still poorly evaluated although millions of IVIs are performed each year worldwide (1.3 million in France in 2019). In addition, discomfort after injection is one of the factors that limit adherence to long-term IVI treatment, some patients fearing this repeated act. We propose in this bicentric, prospective, randomized, parallel group study, to evaluate in this context the impact of the continuous consideration of the risk of dry eye. The expected results are the objective improvement of dry eye indicators, comfort and quality of life of patients, all aimed at optimizing the adherence of our patients to their AMD treatment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dry Eye Syndromes Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Experimental

Preservative-free ophtalmic lubricant emulsion countinuous during 6 month after intravitreal Injections for Age-related macular degeneration

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Preservative-free ophtalmic lubricant emulsion

Intervention Type DEVICE

Use of a preservative-free ophtalmic lubricant emulsion continous during 6 months

Routine treatment

Preservative-free ophtalmic lubricant emulsion during few days after intravitreal Injections for Age-related macular degeneration

Group Type OTHER

Routine treatment

Intervention Type OTHER

Use of a preservative-free ophtalmic lubricant emulsion after each intravitreal injection during few days

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Preservative-free ophtalmic lubricant emulsion

Use of a preservative-free ophtalmic lubricant emulsion continous during 6 months

Intervention Type DEVICE

Routine treatment

Use of a preservative-free ophtalmic lubricant emulsion after each intravitreal injection during few days

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patient treated for exudative AMD with at least one eye receiving IVI with an anti-VEGF for at least 12 months.
* Patient with at least one untreated dry eye symptom.
* Only one eye is included per patient. For patients injected bilaterally, the eye with the lowest TBUT will be included, otherwise the one with the highest Oxford score, otherwise the one with the lowest Schirmer score. If these 3 parameters are similar, the right eye will be included by default.
* Patient who has given informed consent to participate and understands the information related to the study.
* Patient affiliated with a social security plan or beneficiary of such a plan.
* Concurrent participation in non-interventional research is allowed. Concurrent participation in interventional research may be evaluated on a case-by-case basis by the Principal Investigator.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with meatus plugs at inclusion.
* Eye surgery ≤ 3 months pre-inclusion (including laser or refractive).
* Anticholinergic\* treatment prior to inclusion.
* Patients unable to maintain follow-up during the study period.
* Evidence of active ocular infection in either eye.
* History or presence of non-drying ocular surface disorders in either eye.
* Trauma or surgery to the eyelids.
* Any ocular or systemic pathology or treatment identified by the Investigator as likely to interfere with the results of the study.
* Hypersensitivity to any component of the medical device.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Direction Centrale du Service de Santé des Armées

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hopital Avicenne

Bobigny, , France

Site Status

HIA Desgenettes

Lyon, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Torres-Villaros H, Giocanti-Auregan A, Doan S, Agard E, Billant J, Arbousoff N, Matagrin B, Fenniri I, Dot C. Continuous versus Intermittent Use of Tear Substitutes in Patients Treated with Anti-VEGF for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: The TREDIA Study. Ophthalmol Ther. 2025 Sep;14(9):2231-2241. doi: 10.1007/s40123-025-01201-3. Epub 2025 Jul 22.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40691408 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2023-A00620-45

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2022PPRC11

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.