Constitutional Alignment in Osteoarthritic and Healthy Chinese

NCT ID: NCT06158425

Last Updated: 2023-12-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

353 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-11-22

Study Completion Date

2023-12-06

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

coronal plane alignment of the knee(CPAK) distribution of 246 cases(477 knees) of OA patients and 107 cases(214 knees) of healthy people were examined on long-leg radiographs retrospectively. Radiological measurements and CPAK classification on different Kellgren- Lawrence(K-L) Grade in patients with unilateral total knee arthroplasty(TKA) were compared. Clinical outcomes of CPAK type I patients performed by mechanical alignment(MA) and restricted kinematic alignment(rKA) during TKA were examined. ML algorithm including K nearest neighbors (KNN), random forest(RF), artificial neural networks (ANN), logistic regression(LR) and gradient boosting (GBDT) were established, the dependent variable was set as whether the constitutional phenotype of an arthritic knee classified as type I was type I.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Study groups and design OA group Data for consecutive OA patients with knee pain who underwent primary TKA by one senior surgeon between August 2021 and July 2023 at a single institution were analyzed retrospectively. A total of 273 patients underwent long-leg radiographs. The following 27 patients were excluded from this study: prior total hip arthroplasty, 2; obvious bony deficiency of the femur or tibia, 10; simultaneous flexion of the knee and rotation of the leg on radiographs, 15. CPAK distribution of the remaining 246 cases(unilateral, 15; bilateral, 231; totally 477 knees) was examined.

healthy group Data for consecutive visitors at outpatient clinic who underwent long-leg radiographs but without any sign of cartilage degeneration or medical history of low extremity between January 2023 and July 2023 at the same institution were analyzed retrospectively. A total of 136 visitors were recruited. The following 18 visitors were excluded from this study: extra-articular deformity of the femur or tibia, 15; simultaneous flexion of the knee and rotation of the leg on radiographs, 13; poor quality image, 1. CPAK distribution of the remaining 107 cases(214 knees) was examined.

Radiological measurements All participants underwent standard digital long leg radiographs. The mechanical axis of the femur was marked from the centre of the femoral head to the centre of the knee. The centre of the head was marked using the concentric-circle method to identify the centre. The centre of the ankle was marked as the point on the talar dome at mid-width. The mHKA angle was the angle subtended by the mechanical axes of the femur and tibia. The LDFA was defined as the lateral angle formed between the femoral mechanical axis and the joint line of the distal femur. The MPTA was defined as the medical angle formed between the tibial mechanical axis and the joint line of the proximal tibia. Joint line convergence angle(JLCA) was the angle formed between joint orientation lines on opposite sides of the same joint\[17\]. All measurements were carried out by an orthopaedic fellow. A senior author undertook a subgroup analysis of 60 knees in OA group and repeated at one- week intervals to assess for inter- and intra- observer agreement.

CPAK classification of OA and healthy group aHKA was calculated based on the following formula: aHKA=MPTA-LDFA. JLO was calculated by the formula: JLO=MPTA+LDFA. With aHKA and JLO measured, patients can be matched to 9 possible CPAK alignment groups. The mean aHKA and JLO of the two groups were rounded to the nearest whole number for final allocation to a CPAK Class. CPAK limits for the definition of neutral knees was an aHKA of 0 ± 2 degrees. CPAK boundaries for a neutral JLO were defined as 180 ± 3 degrees, varus aHKA less than-2 degrees and a valgus aHKA more than+2 degrees. An apex distal JLO was less than 177°, while an apex proximal JLO was greater than 183°\[9\]. The OA and healthy group were categorized according to the CPAK classification, and their distribution were investigated.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

OA group

Data for consecutive OA patients with knee pain who underwent primary TKA by one senior surgeon between August 2021 and July 2023 at a single institution were analyzed retrospectively. A total of 273 patients underwent long-leg radiographs. The following 27 patients were excluded from this study: prior total hip arthroplasty, 2; obvious bony deficiency of the femur or tibia, 10; simultaneous flexion of the knee and rotation of the leg on radiographs, 15. CPAK distribution of the remaining 246 cases(unilateral, 15; bilateral, 231; totally 477 knees) was examined.

long-leg radiograph

Intervention Type RADIATION

A flat-panel digital radiography(DR) equipment (Siemens DR AXIOM Aristos AX/VX) was used to capture full-length bipedal lower extremities in a standing position. The technician moved the detector from top to bottom, capturing four parts: the bilateral hip joints, femur, tibia and fibula and ankle joint. The exposure parameters for each part were as follows: 1st exposure - 85kV, 75mAs; 2nd exposure - 80kV, 50mAs; 3rd exposure - 75kV, 40mAs; 4th exposure - 68kV, 20mAs. The distance from the source (kv-kg) was 300cm, and the field of view was 43.18cm x 43.18cm. All 4 X-rays were stitched using the Siemens DR Station.

healthy group

Data for consecutive visitors at outpatient clinic who underwent long-leg radiographs but without any sign of cartilage degeneration or medical history of low extremity between January 2023 and July 2023 at the same institution were analyzed retrospectively. A total of 136 visitors were recruited. The following 18 visitors were excluded from this study: extra-articular deformity of the femur or tibia, 15; simultaneous flexion of the knee and rotation of the leg on radiographs, 13; poor quality image, 1. CPAK distribution of the remaining 107 cases(214 knees) was examined.

long-leg radiograph

Intervention Type RADIATION

A flat-panel digital radiography(DR) equipment (Siemens DR AXIOM Aristos AX/VX) was used to capture full-length bipedal lower extremities in a standing position. The technician moved the detector from top to bottom, capturing four parts: the bilateral hip joints, femur, tibia and fibula and ankle joint. The exposure parameters for each part were as follows: 1st exposure - 85kV, 75mAs; 2nd exposure - 80kV, 50mAs; 3rd exposure - 75kV, 40mAs; 4th exposure - 68kV, 20mAs. The distance from the source (kv-kg) was 300cm, and the field of view was 43.18cm x 43.18cm. All 4 X-rays were stitched using the Siemens DR Station.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

long-leg radiograph

A flat-panel digital radiography(DR) equipment (Siemens DR AXIOM Aristos AX/VX) was used to capture full-length bipedal lower extremities in a standing position. The technician moved the detector from top to bottom, capturing four parts: the bilateral hip joints, femur, tibia and fibula and ankle joint. The exposure parameters for each part were as follows: 1st exposure - 85kV, 75mAs; 2nd exposure - 80kV, 50mAs; 3rd exposure - 75kV, 40mAs; 4th exposure - 68kV, 20mAs. The distance from the source (kv-kg) was 300cm, and the field of view was 43.18cm x 43.18cm. All 4 X-rays were stitched using the Siemens DR Station.

Intervention Type RADIATION

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\- OA group: Data for consecutive OA patients with knee pain who underwent primary TKA by one senior surgeon between August 2021 and July 2023 at a single institution were analyzed retrospectively.

Healthy group: Data for consecutive visitors at outpatient clinic who underwent long-leg radiographs but without any sign of cartilage degeneration or medical history of low extremity between January 2023 and July 2023 at the same institution were analyzed retrospectively.

Exclusion Criteria

\- OA group: prior total hip arthroplasty; obvious bony deficiency of the femur or tibia, simultaneous flexion of the knee and rotation of the leg on radiographs Healthy group: extra-articular deformity of the femur or tibia; simultaneous flexion of the knee and rotation of the leg on radiographs; poor quality image
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The First Hospital of Jilin University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bin Liu

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

The First Hospital of Jilin University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The First Hospital of Jilin University

Changchun, , China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Xin Qi, Dr.

Role: CONTACT

Phone: +8615843073202

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Xin Qi, Dr.

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Gao YH, Qi YM, Huang PH, Zhao XY, Qi X. Joint line convergence angle should be considered when constitutional alignment is predicted based on arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle: a retrospective cross-sectional observational study. Int J Surg. 2025 Jan 1;111(1):1624-1628. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002097.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39361874 (View on PubMed)

Gao YH, Qi YM, Huang PH, Zhao XY, Qi X. Distribution of coronal plane alignment of the knee classification in Chinese osteoarthritic and healthy population: a retrospective cross-sectional observational study. Int J Surg. 2024 May 1;110(5):2583-2592. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001178.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38349219 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FirstJilinUQX

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id