To Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Dapagliflozin Plus Metformin Versus Sitagliptin Plus Metformin for Treatment of Diabetes in Patients With Compensated and Stable Decompensated Cirrhosis
NCT ID: NCT06147518
Last Updated: 2023-12-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
240 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-12-20
2024-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Aim compare the safety and efficacy of metformin plus sitagliptin compared to metformin plus dapagliflozin in effective glycemic control and improvement in parameters of metabolic dysfunction, cirrhosis complications and organ dysfunction at 24 weeks.
Study population:Patients with compensated and stable decompensated cirrhosis and age 18-70 years with CTP 5-8
Study design: A prospective, randomized, single center open label study
The study will be conducted on the consecutive patients with liver cirrhosis and type 2 diabetes mellitus seen at the outpatient clinics of Department of Hepatology, ILBS
Sample size: 200 Assuming that 40% people had HbA1c \<7 in Dapagliflozin and 25% in sitagliptin.Alpha = 5%,Power = 80%,Need to enroll total 200 cases(100 in each arm), Drop rate = 10%,Total enrollment = 100 cases (80 each arm).
Randomization by block randomization method taking block size as 10 Intervention: This RCT will be conducted at ILBS New Delhi
Monitoring and assessment: Monitoring will be done for all the parameters of the objective. Documentation will be done for any adverse effects which will happen.
Adverse effects: to be monitored
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Metformin with Sitagliptin
Metformin: 1.5g/d CTPA,1g/d CTPB Sitagliptin: Assess HbA1c/HBSG at 8 weeks, increase sitagliptin to 100 mg if HbA1c\>7%
Metformin
Metformin: 1.5g/d CTPA,1g/d CTPB
Sitagliptin
Sitagliptin: Assess HbA1c/HBSG at 8 weeks, increase sitagliptin to 100 mg if HbA1c\>7%
Metformin with Dapagliflozin
Metformin: 1.5g/d CTPA,1g/d CTPB
Dapagliflozin: Assess HbA1c/HBSG at 8 weeks, increase dapagliflozin to 10 mg if HbA1c\>7%
Metformin
Metformin: 1.5g/d CTPA,1g/d CTPB
Dapagliflozin
Assess HbA1c/HBSG at 8 weeks, increase Dapagliflozin to 10 mg if HbA1c\>7%
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Metformin
Metformin: 1.5g/d CTPA,1g/d CTPB
Sitagliptin
Sitagliptin: Assess HbA1c/HBSG at 8 weeks, increase sitagliptin to 100 mg if HbA1c\>7%
Dapagliflozin
Assess HbA1c/HBSG at 8 weeks, increase Dapagliflozin to 10 mg if HbA1c\>7%
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Child A/B Liver cirrhosis in outpatient setting
3. T2DM patients who have not used any glucose-lowering agents within 8 weeks before consenting, or those who have only used metformin, in addition to diet and exercise
4. HbA1c level of 7.1% or higher but no more than 9.0%
5. BMI of 23 kg/m2 or higher
6. patients who can be monitored closely for medication compliance
7. patients who provide written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Post renal or liver transplantation
3. CTP C / ACLF
4. Intrinsic/structural kidney disease, obstructive uropathy, ADPKD, Anatomic urologic defects that predispose to urinary tract infection
5. Active sepsis / SBP at enrollment
6. Grade II/III/IV HE
7. Pregnancy or Lactating mother
8. Known CKD, obstructive uropathy
9. Patient on MV, NIV, systemic sepsis and shock
10. Lack of informed consent
11. Prior intolerance or S/E to SGLT-2i or DPP4i
12. patients with type 1 diabetes or secondary diabetes
13. patients with medical history of diabetic ketoacidosis
14. patients with medical history of myocardial infarction, cerebral infarction, or stroke within 12 weeks before consent to the study
15. estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) less than 45 mL/min/1.73 m2
16. unstable hypertension or dyslipidemia within 12 weeks before consent to the study
17. HB \<9 g/L, patients with haemoglobinopathy, acute hemolysisStudy period: one year after ethical approval.
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Dr Rakesh Kumar Jagdish
New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, India
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Dr Jayashree Biswas, MD
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ILBS-Cirrhosis-68
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id