Trial Outcomes & Findings for Phase 2a, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacodynamics of EP262 in Subjects With Atopic Dermatitis (NCT NCT06144424)
NCT ID: NCT06144424
Last Updated: 2025-08-24
Results Overview
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable or unintended sign (including a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product. A TEAE is defined as an adverse event (AE) with an onset after the first dose of study drug or an existing event that worsened after the first dose during the study.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
32 participants
up to Week 10
2025-08-24
Participant Flow
This study was conducted in the United States and Canada.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
150 mg EP262 QD
Participants received oral EP262 150 milligrams (mg) QD during the 6-week Double-blind Treatment Period. After administration of the last dose, participants entered a 4-week Follow-up Period.
|
Placebo QD
Participants received matching oral placebo once daily (QD) during the 6-week Double-blind Treatment Period. After administration of the last dose, participants entered a 4-week Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
21
|
11
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
18
|
11
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
3
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
150 mg EP262 QD
Participants received oral EP262 150 milligrams (mg) QD during the 6-week Double-blind Treatment Period. After administration of the last dose, participants entered a 4-week Follow-up Period.
|
Placebo QD
Participants received matching oral placebo once daily (QD) during the 6-week Double-blind Treatment Period. After administration of the last dose, participants entered a 4-week Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
2
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Incarceration
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Phase 2a, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacodynamics of EP262 in Subjects With Atopic Dermatitis
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
150 mg EP262 QD
n=21 Participants
Participants received oral EP262 150 milligrams (mg) QD during the 6-week Double-blind Treatment Period. After administration of the last dose, participants entered a 4-week Follow-up Period.
|
Placebo QD
n=11 Participants
Participants received matching oral placebo once daily (QD) during the 6-week Double-blind Treatment Period. After administration of the last dose, participants entered a 4-week Follow-up Period.
|
Total
n=32 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
39.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.54 • n=5 Participants
|
41.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.30 • n=7 Participants
|
40.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.79 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
29 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: up to Week 10Population: Safety Analysis Set: all participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of randomized study drug. Safety analyses were based upon treatment actually received.
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable or unintended sign (including a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product. A TEAE is defined as an adverse event (AE) with an onset after the first dose of study drug or an existing event that worsened after the first dose during the study.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
150 mg EP262 QD
n=21 Participants
Participants received oral EP262 150 milligrams (mg) QD during the 6-week Double-blind Treatment Period. After administration of the last dose, participants entered a 4-week Follow-up Period.
|
Placebo QD
n=11 Participants
Participants received matching oral placebo once daily (QD) during the 6-week Double-blind Treatment Period. After administration of the last dose, participants entered a 4-week Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)
|
4 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: up to Week 10Population: Safety Analysis Set
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable or unintended sign (including a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product. A TEAE is defined as an adverse event (AE) with an onset after the first dose of study drug or an existing event that worsened after the first dose during the study. AEs were graded for severity using the the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0 (CTCAE v.5). CTCAE grades were scored as: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe or medically significant; Grade 4 = life threatening; Grade 5 = death related to the AE.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
150 mg EP262 QD
n=21 Participants
Participants received oral EP262 150 milligrams (mg) QD during the 6-week Double-blind Treatment Period. After administration of the last dose, participants entered a 4-week Follow-up Period.
|
Placebo QD
n=11 Participants
Participants received matching oral placebo once daily (QD) during the 6-week Double-blind Treatment Period. After administration of the last dose, participants entered a 4-week Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Any ≥Grade 3 TEAE
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: up to Week 10Population: Safety Analysis Set
Clinical meaningfulness was determined by the investigator.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
150 mg EP262 QD
n=21 Participants
Participants received oral EP262 150 milligrams (mg) QD during the 6-week Double-blind Treatment Period. After administration of the last dose, participants entered a 4-week Follow-up Period.
|
Placebo QD
n=11 Participants
Participants received matching oral placebo once daily (QD) during the 6-week Double-blind Treatment Period. After administration of the last dose, participants entered a 4-week Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: up to Week 10Population: Safety Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed.
Clinical meaningfulness was determined by the investigator.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
150 mg EP262 QD
n=18 Participants
Participants received oral EP262 150 milligrams (mg) QD during the 6-week Double-blind Treatment Period. After administration of the last dose, participants entered a 4-week Follow-up Period.
|
Placebo QD
n=11 Participants
Participants received matching oral placebo once daily (QD) during the 6-week Double-blind Treatment Period. After administration of the last dose, participants entered a 4-week Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Changes From Baseline in Electrocardiograms (ECGs )
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: up to Week 10Population: Safety Analysis Set
Clinical meaningfulness was determined by the investigator.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
150 mg EP262 QD
n=21 Participants
Participants received oral EP262 150 milligrams (mg) QD during the 6-week Double-blind Treatment Period. After administration of the last dose, participants entered a 4-week Follow-up Period.
|
Placebo QD
n=11 Participants
Participants received matching oral placebo once daily (QD) during the 6-week Double-blind Treatment Period. After administration of the last dose, participants entered a 4-week Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Changes From Baseline in Clinical Hematology, Chemistry, or Coagulation Parameters
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 6Population: Full Analysis Set: all participant who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of randomized study drug. Participants were analyzed according to randomized treatment assignment.
Biopsies were taken from lesional and nonlesional skin, and differential gene expression was analyzed by comparing lesional samples at baseline and Week 6 to nonlesional reference samples at baseline. Genes were classified as differentially expressed if they met 2 criteria: an absolute log2 fold change greater than 1.5 and an adjusted p-value less than 0.05 using Wilcoxon signed rank test or paired Students t-test and Bonferroni correction.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
150 mg EP262 QD
n=21 Participants
Participants received oral EP262 150 milligrams (mg) QD during the 6-week Double-blind Treatment Period. After administration of the last dose, participants entered a 4-week Follow-up Period.
|
Placebo QD
n=11 Participants
Participants received matching oral placebo once daily (QD) during the 6-week Double-blind Treatment Period. After administration of the last dose, participants entered a 4-week Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With a Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Gene Expression Signature and Skin Histology (Epidermal Thickness, Immune Cell Infiltration, Markers of Epidermal Proliferation) as Assessed From Biopsies of Lesional Skin
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Placebo QD
150 mg EP262 QD
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo QD
n=11 participants at risk
Participants received matching oral placebo once daily (QD) during the 6-week Double-blind Treatment Period. After administration of the last dose, participants entered a 4-week Follow-up Period.
|
150 mg EP262 QD
n=21 participants at risk
Participants received oral EP262 150 milligrams (mg) QD during the 6-week Double-blind Treatment Period. After administration of the last dose, participants entered a 4-week Follow-up Period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Bacterial infection
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1 • up to Week 10
Analysis was conducted in the Safety Analysis Set, comprised of all participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of randomized study drug. Safety analyses were based upon treatment actually received.
|
0.00%
0/21 • up to Week 10
Analysis was conducted in the Safety Analysis Set, comprised of all participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of randomized study drug. Safety analyses were based upon treatment actually received.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis atopic
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1 • up to Week 10
Analysis was conducted in the Safety Analysis Set, comprised of all participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of randomized study drug. Safety analyses were based upon treatment actually received.
|
4.8%
1/21 • Number of events 1 • up to Week 10
Analysis was conducted in the Safety Analysis Set, comprised of all participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of randomized study drug. Safety analyses were based upon treatment actually received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1 • up to Week 10
Analysis was conducted in the Safety Analysis Set, comprised of all participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of randomized study drug. Safety analyses were based upon treatment actually received.
|
0.00%
0/21 • up to Week 10
Analysis was conducted in the Safety Analysis Set, comprised of all participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of randomized study drug. Safety analyses were based upon treatment actually received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Food poisoning
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1 • up to Week 10
Analysis was conducted in the Safety Analysis Set, comprised of all participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of randomized study drug. Safety analyses were based upon treatment actually received.
|
0.00%
0/21 • up to Week 10
Analysis was conducted in the Safety Analysis Set, comprised of all participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of randomized study drug. Safety analyses were based upon treatment actually received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1 • up to Week 10
Analysis was conducted in the Safety Analysis Set, comprised of all participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of randomized study drug. Safety analyses were based upon treatment actually received.
|
0.00%
0/21 • up to Week 10
Analysis was conducted in the Safety Analysis Set, comprised of all participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of randomized study drug. Safety analyses were based upon treatment actually received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis viral
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1 • up to Week 10
Analysis was conducted in the Safety Analysis Set, comprised of all participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of randomized study drug. Safety analyses were based upon treatment actually received.
|
0.00%
0/21 • up to Week 10
Analysis was conducted in the Safety Analysis Set, comprised of all participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of randomized study drug. Safety analyses were based upon treatment actually received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Lower respiratory tract infection
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1 • up to Week 10
Analysis was conducted in the Safety Analysis Set, comprised of all participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of randomized study drug. Safety analyses were based upon treatment actually received.
|
0.00%
0/21 • up to Week 10
Analysis was conducted in the Safety Analysis Set, comprised of all participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of randomized study drug. Safety analyses were based upon treatment actually received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Muscle strain
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1 • up to Week 10
Analysis was conducted in the Safety Analysis Set, comprised of all participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of randomized study drug. Safety analyses were based upon treatment actually received.
|
0.00%
0/21 • up to Week 10
Analysis was conducted in the Safety Analysis Set, comprised of all participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of randomized study drug. Safety analyses were based upon treatment actually received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1 • up to Week 10
Analysis was conducted in the Safety Analysis Set, comprised of all participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of randomized study drug. Safety analyses were based upon treatment actually received.
|
0.00%
0/21 • up to Week 10
Analysis was conducted in the Safety Analysis Set, comprised of all participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of randomized study drug. Safety analyses were based upon treatment actually received.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1 • up to Week 10
Analysis was conducted in the Safety Analysis Set, comprised of all participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of randomized study drug. Safety analyses were based upon treatment actually received.
|
0.00%
0/21 • up to Week 10
Analysis was conducted in the Safety Analysis Set, comprised of all participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of randomized study drug. Safety analyses were based upon treatment actually received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
18.2%
2/11 • Number of events 2 • up to Week 10
Analysis was conducted in the Safety Analysis Set, comprised of all participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of randomized study drug. Safety analyses were based upon treatment actually received.
|
4.8%
1/21 • Number of events 1 • up to Week 10
Analysis was conducted in the Safety Analysis Set, comprised of all participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of randomized study drug. Safety analyses were based upon treatment actually received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral rash
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1 • up to Week 10
Analysis was conducted in the Safety Analysis Set, comprised of all participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of randomized study drug. Safety analyses were based upon treatment actually received.
|
0.00%
0/21 • up to Week 10
Analysis was conducted in the Safety Analysis Set, comprised of all participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of randomized study drug. Safety analyses were based upon treatment actually received.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Following the first publication, the Institution and/or Principal Investigator may publish data or results from the Study, provided, however, that the Institution and/or Principal Investigator submits the proposed publication to the Sponsor for review at least sixty (60) days prior to the date of the proposed publication. Sponsor may remove from the proposed publication any information that is considered confidential and/or proprietary other than Study data and results.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER