Recognition of Second Twin. Second Training vs Naive Performer. PROMPT Mannequin

NCT ID: NCT06127706

Last Updated: 2024-01-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

24 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-10-01

Study Completion Date

2023-12-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Anterior foot identification in second twin delivery Two different population of resident in ObGyn Group 1 previous formal lecture on twin vaginal delivery followed by PROMPT mannequin scenario.

Group 2 naive residents

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The present study is addressed to evidential skills in residents with and without previous specific didactical approach to twin vaginal delivery in identification of anterior fetal foot.

The two group are randomized by age, sex, seniority. Both the naive and the previous lecture groups are invited to scenario without knowing the intention to test their skills.

The time to reach, the number of attempts are recorded.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Twin Vaginal Delivery Skills

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

two groups randomized One with previous lecture and training, one without
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
the two groups are invited for a lecture and are exposed to training skills

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Formal lecture and training

exposure to single test of skills

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

twin vaginal delivery simulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

skill test after formal lecture and simulation in group 1 and after digital learning only

Digital learning only

exposure to single test of skill

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

twin vaginal delivery simulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

skill test after formal lecture and simulation in group 1 and after digital learning only

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

twin vaginal delivery simulation

skill test after formal lecture and simulation in group 1 and after digital learning only

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

formal lecture digital learning

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* residents in Ob Gyn

Exclusion Criteria

* none
Minimum Eligible Age

25 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

G. d'Annunzio University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Claudio Celentano

Director

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Claudio Celentano

Pescara, Italia, Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Gauthier S, Jeanneteau P, Legendre G, Boulvais E, Collin R, Malo L, Rolland D, Courtin O, Thubert T, Winer N, Dochez V. Vaginal delivery of the second twin: A simulation program for residents in obstetrics and gynecology in a type III university maternity hospital. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2022 Oct;51(8):102434. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2022.102434. Epub 2022 Jun 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35768063 (View on PubMed)

Desseauve D, Daelemans C, Farin A, Jauvion IBM, Ceccaldi PF; Prise en charge des Accouchements a Risque eT des Urgences Maternelles PARTUM teaching program. Internal podalic version of second twin: Improving feet identification using a simulation model. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022 Aug;275:9-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.05.036. Epub 2022 Jun 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35691221 (View on PubMed)

Celentano C, Prefumo F, Matarrelli B, Mastracchio J, Mauri S, Rosati M. Comparison of practice vs theory model training for vacuum-assisted delivery: A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2023 Nov;290:109-114. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.09.024. Epub 2023 Sep 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37776704 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ObGynEASC003

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Outpatient Foley Cervix Priming
NCT02842879 COMPLETED NA
Detection of Preterm Labour by Cervical Length
NCT04104984 UNKNOWN EARLY_PHASE1
Virtual Reality Birth Simulator
NCT06653270 RECRUITING NA