Pilot Study of Neurofeedback for Photosensitivity in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

NCT ID: NCT06109909

Last Updated: 2025-12-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

36 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-01-01

Study Completion Date

2026-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this study is to complete a pilot study testing the feasibility and acceptability of low-intensity pulse-based transcranial stimulation (LIP-tES) neurofeedback intervention for reducing photosensitivity symptoms in Veterans with a history of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). The study will also complete resting-state MRI scans to assess neurophysiological markers of photosensitivity and changes associated with LIP-tES intervention.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Photosensitivity (PS) is one of the more common sequelae of TBI, with over 50% of TBI patients reporting some level of PS in the acute and/or chronic stages. PS can range from mild to severe and can significantly impair social, physical, and cognitive functioning, as well as rehabilitation outcomes. While spectacle chromatic filters are conventionally used to alleviate symptoms, they are not designed to resolve issues with PS and have been associated with lower symptom recovery over time, underscoring the need to develop more effective, non-invasive treatment options that can reduce or eliminate PS. Recent work has shown that neurofeedback interventions, such as Low Intensity Pulse-Based Transcranial Electrical Stimulation (LIP-tES) may be effective in treating post-concussive symptoms and a preliminary case study from the investigators' research group suggests that LIP-tES may also be able to reduce PS symptoms in Veterans with a history of mild TBI. However, both the mechanism by which LIP-tES alters brain activity and alleviates symptoms across a range of disorders remains unclear as does the neurobiological basis of PS associated with mTBI and psychiatric comorbidities commonly seen in today's Veteran population. These knowledge gaps represent important limitations both for the clinical characterization of PS in Veterans and development/optimization of novel treatment options. This proposal will take an important first step in addressing these two important knowledge gaps. Aim 1: Complete a preliminary study testing the feasibility and acceptability of a novel LIP-tES intervention designed to reduce severity of PS in patients with a history of mTBI. Extending a recent case study completed by the investigators' research group, the investigators will complete a pilot study of LIP-tES for the treatment of PS in Veterans with a history of mTBI. The investigators will track recruitment capability (participants screened vs. enrolled, attrition rates and reasons for attrition), acceptability and suitability of the intervention, evaluate suitability of the sham procedure the investigators developed, and gain preliminary evaluation of participant responses to the intervention. Aim 2: Assess neurophysiological markers of PS and changes associated with LIP-tES intervention using resting-state fMRI. A subset of the participants will complete two MRI scans during the initial visit after the last LIP-tES or sham session. Preliminary work from the investigators' laboratory has identified a sparse connectome of regions that are predictive of moderate/severe PS ratings in a polymorbid sample of Veterans from the Translational Research Center for TBI and Stress Disorders (TRACTS) longitudinal cohort study. Extending this work, the investigators will test whether classification models using this previously identified connectome will correctly identify individuals who report a reduction in PS after treatment and whether connections are predictive of PS severity. By examining resting-state functional connectivity prior to and after completion of LIP-tES, the proposed study aims to increase the understanding of the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of PS in mTBI and the mechanism by which LIP-tES may alleviate these symptoms.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Photophobia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

After consent, participants will be randomly assigned to either the LIP-tES intervention or sham control group. Participants will complete 12 sessions over 6 weeks during which photosensitivity symptoms will be tracked using the Utah Photophobia Symptom Impact Scale (UPSIS). A subset of participants will also complete a resting-state MRI scan session during the initial visit and again during the 12th visit. A follow-up phone call will be placed after a 6 week wash-out period. Group assignment will be disclosed at this time and participants in the sham condition who would like to receive the LIP-tES intervention will be able to return for an additional 12 sessions over 6 weeks during which they will receive LIP-tES and photosensitivity symptoms will be tracked using the UPSIS questionnaire.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
Sham treatment, single-blind design. During the sham treatment, we will prep and place electrodes in the same manner as participants receiving the LIP-tES treatment. However, no LIP-tES pulses will be sent from the system during the sham treatment. The operator will know which group the participant is assigned to but all aspects of study design and data collection will be the same from the perspective of the participant.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Neurofeedback

Half of the participants will be blindly assigned to receive 12 sessions of LIP-tES intervention over 6 weeks. A subset of these participants will also complete a resting-state MRI scan during the initial session (prior to LIP-tES intervention) and after their final LIP-tES intervention.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Micro Current Neurofeedback Device using Low-Frequency Pulse-Based Transcranial Electrical Stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

The EEG interface device is a J\&J Engineering 1-330 C2 box. The software used to determine LIP-tES feedback patterns was developed by Neurogen High Performance Neurofeedback. The EEG sampling frequency is 256 Hz on each of 2 EEG acquisition channels. The feedback LIP-tES is delivered via the 4 EEG leads (A+,A-,B+,B-), with respect to the Common Neck Reference. During each session, 2 electrodes (A- and B-) are attached to the participant's left and right mastoids, while the remaining two electrodes (A+ and B+) are moved to various locations on the scale to record EEG signals. All four (A+,A-,B+,B-) electrodes are involved in applying weak electrical pulses back to the brain (feedback process). The brief feedback pulse (\~100mV) is adaptive and determined based on the offset of the frequency spectrum recorded across the left and right hemisphere (A vs. B) electrodes in the time window immediately prior to stimulation.

Sham Treatment

Half of the participants will be blindly assigned to receive 12 sessions of a sham intervention that will mirror all aspects of the LIP-tES intervention except that no neurofeedback pulses will be delivered. A subset of these participants will also complete a resting-state MRI scan at the beginning of the initial session and at the end of the 12th session.

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Micro Current Neurofeedback Device using Low-Frequency Pulse-Based Transcranial Electrical Stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

The EEG interface device is a J\&J Engineering 1-330 C2 box. The software used to determine LIP-tES feedback patterns was developed by Neurogen High Performance Neurofeedback. The EEG sampling frequency is 256 Hz on each of 2 EEG acquisition channels. The feedback LIP-tES is delivered via the 4 EEG leads (A+,A-,B+,B-), with respect to the Common Neck Reference. During each session, 2 electrodes (A- and B-) are attached to the participant's left and right mastoids, while the remaining two electrodes (A+ and B+) are moved to various locations on the scale to record EEG signals. All four (A+,A-,B+,B-) electrodes are involved in applying weak electrical pulses back to the brain (feedback process). The brief feedback pulse (\~100mV) is adaptive and determined based on the offset of the frequency spectrum recorded across the left and right hemisphere (A vs. B) electrodes in the time window immediately prior to stimulation.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Micro Current Neurofeedback Device using Low-Frequency Pulse-Based Transcranial Electrical Stimulation

The EEG interface device is a J\&J Engineering 1-330 C2 box. The software used to determine LIP-tES feedback patterns was developed by Neurogen High Performance Neurofeedback. The EEG sampling frequency is 256 Hz on each of 2 EEG acquisition channels. The feedback LIP-tES is delivered via the 4 EEG leads (A+,A-,B+,B-), with respect to the Common Neck Reference. During each session, 2 electrodes (A- and B-) are attached to the participant's left and right mastoids, while the remaining two electrodes (A+ and B+) are moved to various locations on the scale to record EEG signals. All four (A+,A-,B+,B-) electrodes are involved in applying weak electrical pulses back to the brain (feedback process). The brief feedback pulse (\~100mV) is adaptive and determined based on the offset of the frequency spectrum recorded across the left and right hemisphere (A vs. B) electrodes in the time window immediately prior to stimulation.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

LIP-tES intervention

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Ages 18-65
* Documented history of mTBI at least 6 months prior to initial study visit
* Documented symptoms of photosensitivity
* Eye exam within the last 12 months documenting best-corrected acuity of 20/20 or better, normal pupillary function, color vision, no abnormalities on OCT scan, and normal Humphrey Visual Field test

Exclusion Criteria

* History of strabismus or amblyopia
* Significant ocular media opacity that could reduce the amount of light entering the pupil in one or both eyes
* Previous or current history of retinal or optic nerve pathology in one or both eyes
* History of stroke and/or visual neglect
* History of neurodegenerative disease (e.g., Parkinson's, multiple sclerosis)
* History of epilepsy or seizures
* History of motor tics
* Current use of medications or substances that may severely affect pupillary response and/or increase photosensitivity
* Individuals with impaired decision-making capacity
* Illiterate or no English language proficiency
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

VA Office of Research and Development

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Francesca C Fortenbaugh, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

VA Boston Healthcare System Jamaica Plain Campus, Jamaica Plain, MA

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

VA Boston Healthcare System Jamaica Plain Campus, Jamaica Plain, MA

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Francesca C Fortenbaugh, PhD

Role: CONTACT

(857) 364-4362

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Francesca C Fortenbaugh, PhD

Role: primary

857-364-4362

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

C4374-P

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id