Trial Outcomes & Findings for Ambispective Study Evaluating the Clinical Results of SAGITTA EVL R Revision Stems (NCT NCT06096168)

NCT ID: NCT06096168

Last Updated: 2025-06-25

Results Overview

Assess the survival rate, at least 4 year-follow-up, whatever the cause of revision. Cumulative survival rate expressed in percentage of implants not revised (remaining in place) using Kaplan Meier calculation.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Target enrollment

42 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Between 4 to 7 years after surgery

Results posted on

2025-06-25

Participant Flow

Unit of analysis: 42

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Per Protocol Population
All patients implanted with a SAGITTA EVLR revision stem in CHU Rouen between 2016 and 2018 meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria. All patients are included in the same arm. No randomization, no control arm.
Overall Study
STARTED
42 42
Overall Study
COMPLETED
10 10
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
32 32

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Per Protocol Population
All patients implanted with a SAGITTA EVLR revision stem in CHU Rouen between 2016 and 2018 meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria. All patients are included in the same arm. No randomization, no control arm.
Overall Study
Death
30
Overall Study
Revision
2

Baseline Characteristics

Weight not available for 3 patients (3 hips)

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Per Protocol Population
n=42 number of implants
All patients implanted with a SAGITTA EVLR revision stem in CHU Rouen between 2016 and 2018 meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria
Age, Continuous
80.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.24 • n=42 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
18 Participants
n=42 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
24 Participants
n=42 Participants
Weight
72.8 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.0 • n=39 Participants • Weight not available for 3 patients (3 hips)

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Between 4 to 7 years after surgery

Assess the survival rate, at least 4 year-follow-up, whatever the cause of revision. Cumulative survival rate expressed in percentage of implants not revised (remaining in place) using Kaplan Meier calculation.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Per Protocol Population
n=42 number of implants
All patients implanted with a SAGITTA EVLR revision stem in CHU Rouen between 2016 and 2018 meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria
Survival Rate at Mid Term Follow-up
90.1 percentage of implant survival

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From per operative period to 4/6 years after surgery

List type and frequency of complications, investigated by clinical and radiological examination following investigator's usual practice

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Per Protocol Population
n=42 hips implanted
All patients implanted with a SAGITTA EVLR revision stem in CHU Rouen between 2016 and 2018 meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria
Adverse Events
Sepsis
1 participants
Adverse Events
Greater trochanter fracture
1 participants
Adverse Events
Posterior dislocation - vicious attitude of the hip
1 participants
Adverse Events
Femoral fracture
1 participants
Adverse Events
Fracture with greater trochanter displacement
1 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At 4/6 years after surgery

Assess the survival rates at least, 4 year-follow-up, whatever the cause of revision, regarding each component of the prothesis

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Per Protocol Population
n=7 number of hips
All patients implanted with a SAGITTA EVLR revision stem in CHU Rouen between 2016 and 2018 meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria
Survival Rates at Mid Term Follow-up (by Component)
100 percentage of implant survival

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At 4/6 years after surgery

Assess the survival rates at least, 4 year-follow-up, whatever the cause of revision, regarding etiology. Percentage of patients with implant in place dispatched following reason for implantation

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Per Protocol Population
n=5 hips implanted
All patients implanted with a SAGITTA EVLR revision stem in CHU Rouen between 2016 and 2018 meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria
Survival Rates at Mid Term Follow-up (by Etiology)
80 percentage of implant

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At 4/6 years after surgery

Assessed by the surgeon through questionary with a 5 item-scale : very satisfied / satisfied / neither satisfied - nor unsatisfied / unsatisfied / very unsatisfied

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Per Protocol Population
n=10 hips implanted
All patients implanted with a SAGITTA EVLR revision stem in CHU Rouen between 2016 and 2018 meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria
Patient's Satisfaction
Very satisfied
4 number of hips
Patient's Satisfaction
Rather satisfied
4 number of hips
Patient's Satisfaction
Neither satisfied nor unsatisfied
2 number of hips
Patient's Satisfaction
Rather unsatisfied
0 number of hips
Patient's Satisfaction
Very unsatisfied
0 number of hips

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At 4/6 years after surgery

Assess the degree of forgetfulness of the prosthesis using FJS-score (Forgotten Joint Score) : FJS stands for Forgotten Joint Score. The Forgotten Joint Score assessment consists of 12 questions and is scored on a 0-100 scale. The higher the score, the less the patient is aware of their affected joint when performing daily activities

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Per Protocol Population
n=9 hips implanted
All patients implanted with a SAGITTA EVLR revision stem in CHU Rouen between 2016 and 2018 meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria
Oblivion of Prosthesis
80.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 10.15

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At 4/6 years after surgery

Evaluate pain, walking, limping and activities of daily life using Harris Hip Score : The global Harris Hip Score consists of a 0 to 100 points scale (100 points is the better outcome)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Per Protocol Population
n=9 hips implanted
All patients implanted with a SAGITTA EVLR revision stem in CHU Rouen between 2016 and 2018 meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria
Functional Improvement
71.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.45

Adverse Events

Per Protocol Population

Serious events: 4 serious events
Other events: 1 other events
Deaths: 30 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Per Protocol Population
n=42 participants at risk
All patients implanted with a SAGITTA EVLR revision stem in CHU Rouen between 2016 and 2018 meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
2.4%
1/42 • Number of events 1 • Until >4-years follow up (maximum duration of 90 months)
Surgical and medical procedures
Posterior dislocation
2.4%
1/42 • Number of events 1 • Until >4-years follow up (maximum duration of 90 months)
Surgical and medical procedures
Femoral fracture
2.4%
1/42 • Number of events 1 • Until >4-years follow up (maximum duration of 90 months)
Surgical and medical procedures
Fracture with greater trochanter displacement
2.4%
1/42 • Number of events 1 • Until >4-years follow up (maximum duration of 90 months)

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Per Protocol Population
n=42 participants at risk
All patients implanted with a SAGITTA EVLR revision stem in CHU Rouen between 2016 and 2018 meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria
Surgical and medical procedures
Greater trochanter fracture
2.4%
1/42 • Number of events 1 • Until >4-years follow up (maximum duration of 90 months)

Additional Information

Sponsor

SERF

Phone: 0472056010

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place