Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
20000 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-12-01
2025-06-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The investigators are working with primary care research teams, and using an online electronic questionnaire. Although the study is entirely observational, the study offers some of the questions in a random order, so the investigators can explore the effect of changing the way in which questions are asked.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Digital Monitoring in Cancer Survivors
NCT06669832
Assessing Patient-reported & Patient-related Outcomes in Randomized Cancer Trials for Older Adults
NCT03676218
A Study Evaluating the Integrative Medicine at Home (IM@HOME) Program in People With Cancer
NCT05053230
Improving Care Pathway Using Simplified Digital Tools for Oncology Patients: a Multicenter "Before-and-after" Study
NCT05968027
Electronic Patient Reporting of Symptoms and Unmet Needs to Connect Patients With Advanced Cancer to Palliative Care Services
NCT07195513
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The focus is on adult patients living in the community who have previously been treated for cancer.
The study uses a range of quality of life questionnaires, and randomises the order in which some questions are asked, in order to explore the impact of how questions are asked on responses.
All patients with be offered the EuroQol 5 dimension, 5 level questionnaire (EQ5D-5L)
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
ECOLOGIC_OR_COMMUNITY
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Different PROM Completion rate
Patients will be randomised to two different PROM questionnaires
The outcome measure will be the completion rate of the two different questionnaires
No interventions assigned to this group
Linked to national data
Patients will be randomly assigned to be asked to link personal data with national cancer data.
The outcome measure will be the proportion of completed questionnaires
No interventions assigned to this group
Linking to national data, early vs. late questions
Subset of cohort 1: Patients will be randomly assigned to be asked the question about data linkage at the beginning vs. end of the questionnaire
The outcome measure will be the proportion answering yes in each arm
No interventions assigned to this group
Impact of additional PROMS on completion and satisfaction
Patients will be randomised to either a standard PROM or additional, symptom directed questionnaire
The outcome measure will be the satisfaction rate of patients in each arm
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Participants need to be able to access the secure online platform, using a mobile device or computer.
* Have capacity and be able to provide informed consent via the online platform.
* To be able to understand, read and write English, with or without support from a trusted individual e.g., friends, family, carer.
Exclusion Criteria
* Participants unable to access secure online platform.
* Participants who do not have sufficiently good understanding of written English to complete the PROMs and are unable to be supported by a trusted individual to complete the questionnaire.
* Participants lacking capacity and unable to give informed consent.
16 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
OTHER
Imperial College London
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Matthew Williams, MBChB PhD FRCR
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Imperial College Healthcare Trust
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
London, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Kerlann Le Calvez, MSc
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Le Calvez K, Gregory JJ, Gath J, Wheatstone P, Ashley L, Chinembiri O, Cunliffe A, Davenport G, Jamieson Gilmore K, Langel K, Miglio C, Pakzad-Shahabi L, Padmasri D, Ruta D, Williams H, Williams M. INDIGO randomised controlled digital clinical trial: INvestigating DIgital outcomes and quality of life in cancer survivors - a study protocol. BMJ Open. 2025 Sep 8;15(9):e104336. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104336.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
000000
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.