Trial Outcomes & Findings for Neuromodulation of Conscious Perception: Investigating Thalamic Roles Through Ultrasonic Stimulation (NCT NCT06083493)

NCT ID: NCT06083493

Last Updated: 2024-11-19

Results Overview

SDT was a means of measuring participants' ability to differentiate between information-bearing patterns and random patterns that distract from the information. Sensitivity measured a participant's ability to differentiate between real and scrambled images on a scale from 0.0 to 1.0, with higher scores indicating better accuracy in detecting a signal when it was present and lower scores indicating more missed signals. A score of 1.0 was perfect sensitivity (i.e., never missing a real signal).

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

61 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Up to 60 minutes after intervention

Results posted on

2024-11-19

Participant Flow

61 participants were consented for this trial. 1 participant was excluded before randomization because of a scheduling conflict.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
LIFUP Excitation
The study will involve the enrollment of 60 participants, who will be randomly assigned to two groups, with each group consisting of 30 participants. The participants will be divided based on the type of transcranial LIFUP they will receive, either excitation or inhibition, targeting four specific thalamic areas. LIFUP excitation: The experimental will consist of a 10-minute baseline period (LIFUP-OFF) followed by four 10-minute sessions of stimulating (LIFUP-ON-excitation) four thalamic areas. The order of thalamic area stimulation will be counterbalanced across participants and will include the ventral anterior (VA), dorsal anterior (DA), ventral posterior (VP), and dorsal posterior (DP) sections of the thalamus.
LIFUP Inhibition
The study will involve the enrollment of 60 participants, who will be randomly assigned to two groups, with each group consisting of 30 participants. The participants will be divided based on the type of transcranial LIFUP they will receive, either excitation or inhibition, targeting four specific thalamic areas. LIFUP inhibition: The experimental will consist of a 10-minute baseline period (LIFUP-OFF) followed by four 10-minute sessions of stimulating (LIFUP-ON-inhibition) four thalamic areas. The order of thalamic area stimulation will be counterbalanced across participants and will include the ventral anterior (VA), dorsal anterior (DA), ventral posterior (VP), and dorsal posterior (DP) sections of the thalamus.
Overall Study
STARTED
30
30
Overall Study
COMPLETED
27
27
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
3
3

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
LIFUP Excitation
The study will involve the enrollment of 60 participants, who will be randomly assigned to two groups, with each group consisting of 30 participants. The participants will be divided based on the type of transcranial LIFUP they will receive, either excitation or inhibition, targeting four specific thalamic areas. LIFUP excitation: The experimental will consist of a 10-minute baseline period (LIFUP-OFF) followed by four 10-minute sessions of stimulating (LIFUP-ON-excitation) four thalamic areas. The order of thalamic area stimulation will be counterbalanced across participants and will include the ventral anterior (VA), dorsal anterior (DA), ventral posterior (VP), and dorsal posterior (DP) sections of the thalamus.
LIFUP Inhibition
The study will involve the enrollment of 60 participants, who will be randomly assigned to two groups, with each group consisting of 30 participants. The participants will be divided based on the type of transcranial LIFUP they will receive, either excitation or inhibition, targeting four specific thalamic areas. LIFUP inhibition: The experimental will consist of a 10-minute baseline period (LIFUP-OFF) followed by four 10-minute sessions of stimulating (LIFUP-ON-inhibition) four thalamic areas. The order of thalamic area stimulation will be counterbalanced across participants and will include the ventral anterior (VA), dorsal anterior (DA), ventral posterior (VP), and dorsal posterior (DP) sections of the thalamus.
Overall Study
Technical issues with the interventional device
2
2
Overall Study
Performed incorrect visual task
1
0
Overall Study
Insufficient baseline performance
0
1

Baseline Characteristics

Neuromodulation of Conscious Perception: Investigating Thalamic Roles Through Ultrasonic Stimulation

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
LIFUP Excitation
n=30 Participants
The study will involve the enrollment of 60 participants, who will be randomly assigned to two groups, with each group consisting of 30 participants. The participants will be divided based on the type of transcranial LIFUP they will receive, either excitation or inhibition, targeting four specific thalamic areas. LIFUP excitation: The experimental will consist of a 10-minute baseline period (LIFUP-OFF) followed by four 10-minute sessions of stimulating (LIFUP-ON-excitation) four thalamic areas. The order of thalamic area stimulation will be counterbalanced across participants and will include the ventral anterior (VA), dorsal anterior (DA), ventral posterior (VP), and dorsal posterior (DP) sections of the thalamus.
LIFUP Inhibition
n=30 Participants
The study will involve the enrollment of 60 participants, who will be randomly assigned to two groups, with each group consisting of 30 participants. The participants will be divided based on the type of transcranial LIFUP they will receive, either excitation or inhibition, targeting four specific thalamic areas. LIFUP inhibition: The experimental will consist of a 10-minute baseline period (LIFUP-OFF) followed by four 10-minute sessions of stimulating (LIFUP-ON-inhibition) four thalamic areas. The order of thalamic area stimulation will be counterbalanced across participants and will include the ventral anterior (VA), dorsal anterior (DA), ventral posterior (VP), and dorsal posterior (DP) sections of the thalamus.
Total
n=60 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
27.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.0 • n=5 Participants
24.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.3 • n=7 Participants
25.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.3 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
21 Participants
n=7 Participants
38 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
22 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
29 Participants
n=5 Participants
28 Participants
n=7 Participants
57 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
19 Participants
n=7 Participants
39 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
30 Participants
n=5 Participants
30 Participants
n=7 Participants
60 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to 60 minutes after intervention

SDT was a means of measuring participants' ability to differentiate between information-bearing patterns and random patterns that distract from the information. Sensitivity measured a participant's ability to differentiate between real and scrambled images on a scale from 0.0 to 1.0, with higher scores indicating better accuracy in detecting a signal when it was present and lower scores indicating more missed signals. A score of 1.0 was perfect sensitivity (i.e., never missing a real signal).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
LIFUP Excitation
n=27 Participants
The study will involve the enrollment of 60 participants, who will be randomly assigned to two groups, with each group consisting of 30 participants. The participants will be divided based on the type of transcranial LIFUP they will receive, either excitation or inhibition, targeting four specific thalamic areas. LIFUP excitation: The experimental will consist of a 10-minute baseline period (LIFUP-OFF) followed by four 10-minute sessions of stimulating (LIFUP-ON-excitation) four thalamic areas. The order of thalamic area stimulation will be counterbalanced across participants and will include the ventral anterior (VA), dorsal anterior (DA), ventral posterior (VP), and dorsal posterior (DP) sections of the thalamus.
LIFUP Inhibition
n=27 Participants
The study will involve the enrollment of 60 participants, who will be randomly assigned to two groups, with each group consisting of 30 participants. The participants will be divided based on the type of transcranial LIFUP they will receive, either excitation or inhibition, targeting four specific thalamic areas. LIFUP inhibition: The experimental will consist of a 10-minute baseline period (LIFUP-OFF) followed by four 10-minute sessions of stimulating (LIFUP-ON-inhibition) four thalamic areas. The order of thalamic area stimulation will be counterbalanced across participants and will include the ventral anterior (VA), dorsal anterior (DA), ventral posterior (VP), and dorsal posterior (DP) sections of the thalamus.
Change in Sensitivity Derived From the Signal Detection Theory (SDT)
Baseline
0.7452 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.1128
0.7419 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.1250
Change in Sensitivity Derived From the Signal Detection Theory (SDT)
Following intervention
0.7520 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.1014
0.7120 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.1674

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to 60 minutes after intervention

SDT was a means of measuring participants' ability to differentiate between information-bearing patterns and random patterns that distract from the information. Perceptual criterion measured a participant's tendency to say "yes" or "no" when the participant was unsure if a signal was present. Perceptual criterion was measured on a scale from -1.0 to 1.0, with a score of 0 indicating no bias towards "yes" or "no". Negative scores meant a bias towards "yes" (more likely to say a signal was present), while positive scores meant a bias towards "no" (more likely to say a signal was absent).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
LIFUP Excitation
n=27 Participants
The study will involve the enrollment of 60 participants, who will be randomly assigned to two groups, with each group consisting of 30 participants. The participants will be divided based on the type of transcranial LIFUP they will receive, either excitation or inhibition, targeting four specific thalamic areas. LIFUP excitation: The experimental will consist of a 10-minute baseline period (LIFUP-OFF) followed by four 10-minute sessions of stimulating (LIFUP-ON-excitation) four thalamic areas. The order of thalamic area stimulation will be counterbalanced across participants and will include the ventral anterior (VA), dorsal anterior (DA), ventral posterior (VP), and dorsal posterior (DP) sections of the thalamus.
LIFUP Inhibition
n=27 Participants
The study will involve the enrollment of 60 participants, who will be randomly assigned to two groups, with each group consisting of 30 participants. The participants will be divided based on the type of transcranial LIFUP they will receive, either excitation or inhibition, targeting four specific thalamic areas. LIFUP inhibition: The experimental will consist of a 10-minute baseline period (LIFUP-OFF) followed by four 10-minute sessions of stimulating (LIFUP-ON-inhibition) four thalamic areas. The order of thalamic area stimulation will be counterbalanced across participants and will include the ventral anterior (VA), dorsal anterior (DA), ventral posterior (VP), and dorsal posterior (DP) sections of the thalamus.
Change in Perceptual Criterion Derived From the Signal Detection Theory (SDT)
Baseline
0.3008 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.2589
0.2092 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.2940
Change in Perceptual Criterion Derived From the Signal Detection Theory (SDT)
Following intervention
0.3113 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.3000
0.2770 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.3322

Adverse Events

LIFUP Excitation

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 4 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

LIFUP Inhibition

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 3 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
LIFUP Excitation
n=30 participants at risk
The study will involve the enrollment of 60 participants, who will be randomly assigned to two groups, with each group consisting of 30 participants. The participants will be divided based on the type of transcranial LIFUP they will receive, either excitation or inhibition, targeting four specific thalamic areas. LIFUP excitation: The experimental will consist of a 10-minute baseline period (LIFUP-OFF) followed by four 10-minute sessions of stimulating (LIFUP-ON-excitation) four thalamic areas. The order of thalamic area stimulation will be counterbalanced across participants and will include the ventral anterior (VA), dorsal anterior (DA), ventral posterior (VP), and dorsal posterior (DP) sections of the thalamus.
LIFUP Inhibition
n=30 participants at risk
The study will involve the enrollment of 60 participants, who will be randomly assigned to two groups, with each group consisting of 30 participants. The participants will be divided based on the type of transcranial LIFUP they will receive, either excitation or inhibition, targeting four specific thalamic areas. LIFUP inhibition: The experimental will consist of a 10-minute baseline period (LIFUP-OFF) followed by four 10-minute sessions of stimulating (LIFUP-ON-inhibition) four thalamic areas. The order of thalamic area stimulation will be counterbalanced across participants and will include the ventral anterior (VA), dorsal anterior (DA), ventral posterior (VP), and dorsal posterior (DP) sections of the thalamus.
Nervous system disorders
Headache
13.3%
4/30 • Up to 32 days
Adverse events were reviewed during the following 3 time points: at the time of the one-study visit, 24 hours via telephone after the study visit, and 30-days via medical chart review.
3.3%
1/30 • Up to 32 days
Adverse events were reviewed during the following 3 time points: at the time of the one-study visit, 24 hours via telephone after the study visit, and 30-days via medical chart review.
General disorders
Fatigue
3.3%
1/30 • Up to 32 days
Adverse events were reviewed during the following 3 time points: at the time of the one-study visit, 24 hours via telephone after the study visit, and 30-days via medical chart review.
0.00%
0/30 • Up to 32 days
Adverse events were reviewed during the following 3 time points: at the time of the one-study visit, 24 hours via telephone after the study visit, and 30-days via medical chart review.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin Irritation - Ear
3.3%
1/30 • Up to 32 days
Adverse events were reviewed during the following 3 time points: at the time of the one-study visit, 24 hours via telephone after the study visit, and 30-days via medical chart review.
0.00%
0/30 • Up to 32 days
Adverse events were reviewed during the following 3 time points: at the time of the one-study visit, 24 hours via telephone after the study visit, and 30-days via medical chart review.
Eye disorders
Eye Irritation
3.3%
1/30 • Up to 32 days
Adverse events were reviewed during the following 3 time points: at the time of the one-study visit, 24 hours via telephone after the study visit, and 30-days via medical chart review.
0.00%
0/30 • Up to 32 days
Adverse events were reviewed during the following 3 time points: at the time of the one-study visit, 24 hours via telephone after the study visit, and 30-days via medical chart review.
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Tinnitus
3.3%
1/30 • Up to 32 days
Adverse events were reviewed during the following 3 time points: at the time of the one-study visit, 24 hours via telephone after the study visit, and 30-days via medical chart review.
0.00%
0/30 • Up to 32 days
Adverse events were reviewed during the following 3 time points: at the time of the one-study visit, 24 hours via telephone after the study visit, and 30-days via medical chart review.
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Dizziness
3.3%
1/30 • Up to 32 days
Adverse events were reviewed during the following 3 time points: at the time of the one-study visit, 24 hours via telephone after the study visit, and 30-days via medical chart review.
3.3%
1/30 • Up to 32 days
Adverse events were reviewed during the following 3 time points: at the time of the one-study visit, 24 hours via telephone after the study visit, and 30-days via medical chart review.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle Spasms
0.00%
0/30 • Up to 32 days
Adverse events were reviewed during the following 3 time points: at the time of the one-study visit, 24 hours via telephone after the study visit, and 30-days via medical chart review.
3.3%
1/30 • Up to 32 days
Adverse events were reviewed during the following 3 time points: at the time of the one-study visit, 24 hours via telephone after the study visit, and 30-days via medical chart review.
Eye disorders
Blurred Vision
0.00%
0/30 • Up to 32 days
Adverse events were reviewed during the following 3 time points: at the time of the one-study visit, 24 hours via telephone after the study visit, and 30-days via medical chart review.
3.3%
1/30 • Up to 32 days
Adverse events were reviewed during the following 3 time points: at the time of the one-study visit, 24 hours via telephone after the study visit, and 30-days via medical chart review.

Additional Information

Zirui Huang

University of Michigan

Phone: 734-615-2875

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place