Evaluation and Comparison of a Novel Dentrifice Formulation on Plaque Removal
NCT ID: NCT06082869
Last Updated: 2023-10-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
EARLY_PHASE1
82 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-01-30
2023-02-23
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Compare the Clinical Efficacy of Prototype Toothpastes
NCT00926029
Efficacy of Three Experimental Toothpastes to Remove Plaque
NCT02992691
Compare the Clinical Efficacy of Prototype Toothpastes.
NCT00761930
The Efficacy of a Dentifrice in Providing Relief From the Pain of Dentinal Hypersensitivity
NCT01592864
Evaluation of Plaque Fluid Fluoride Retention From Fluoride Toothpastes
NCT00708305
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Participants who met study entry criteria were randomized to either the test (Protegera™) or control (Crest™ Cavity Protection) toothpaste, and each were given the same straight, soft bristled toothbrush to use throughout the study.
On Day 1, participants were given an oral exam, and a pre-brushing plaque score was recorded. Participants then brushed their teeth for one minute under supervision, and a post-brushing plaque score was recorded.
On Day 7, participants were given an oral exam, and a pre-brushing plaque score was recorded. Participants then brushed their teeth for one minute under supervision, and a post-brushing plaque score was recorded.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Experimental
Protegera™ toothpaste (NaF), brushing twice daily for one minute
Protegera™ toothpaste (NaF)
Plaque Reduction
Control
Crest™ Cavity Protection toothpaste (NaF), brushing twice daily for one minute
Crest™ Cavity Protection toothpaste (NaF)
Plaque Reduction
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Protegera™ toothpaste (NaF)
Plaque Reduction
Crest™ Cavity Protection toothpaste (NaF)
Plaque Reduction
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Have read and signed an Informed Consent Form.
3. Have been in good health based on medical history review by the Principal Investigator.
4. Have had a minimum of 18 natural teeth with scorable facial and lingual surfaces. Teeth that were grossly carious, orthodontically banded, restorations such as crowns, veneers or implants, exhibit general cervical abrasion and/or enamel abrasion, or third molars were not included in the tooth count.
5. (If female of child bearing age) have been using an established method of birth control (systemic contraceptives such as birth control pills, injectable contraceptive or patch contraceptives, partner with vasectomy, condom with additional spermicide, IUD or abstinence).
6. Have had a mean full-mouth pre-brushing plaque score (Soparkar Modification1 of the Turesky Modification2 of the plaque index of Quigley and Hein.3) of ≥ 2.00 at the baseline visit.
7. Have agreed not to have a dental prophylaxis or any other elective, non-emergency dental procedures (other than those provided during the study) any time during the 7-day study.
8. Have been willing to refrain from all oral hygiene procedures (including chewing gum) for 24 hrs. and refrained from eating, drinking and smoking for approximately 2 hours prior to Visits 1 \& 2.
9. Have agreed to refrain from use of all oral hygiene products (i.e., floss, mouthwash, etc.), other than the toothbrush and toothpaste supplied, for the duration of the 7-day study.
10. Have agreed to comply with the conditions and schedule of the study.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Had any physical limitations or restrictions which might preclude normal tooth brushing.
3. Had existing serious medical condition or transmittable disease as determined after review of the medical history form. These will include but not be limited to: active hepatitis, tuberculosis, AIDS, asthma, bleeding disorder, diabetes, cirrhosis, leukemia, renal disease, sarcoidosis, vascular disease, thrush, or leukoplakia.
4. Self-reported as pregnant or nursing female.
5. Required antibiotic therapy within 30-days prior to study treatment.
6. Had a history of adverse effects, oral soft or hard tissue sensitivity, to any ingredient in the test materials.
7. Had received therapy with any medications, currently or within the last 30 days, which might interfere with the outcome of the study by affecting tissue condition, or salivation, particularly chronic therapy or long-term use, as determined by the investigator.
8. Had severe periodontal disease or being actively treated for periodontal disease.
9. Had fixed or removable orthodontic appliances, bridges, peri/oral piercings, or removable partial dentures.
10. Had significant oral soft tissue pathology based on a visual examination baseline.
11. Had evidence of poor oral hygiene or rampant dental caries or presence of extrinsic stain or calculus deposits that may interfere with plaque assessments.
12. Had received a dental prophylaxis within 30-days prior to Visit 1.
13. Had participated in another dental research study within 30-days prior to Visit 1.
18 Years
69 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Protegera, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jeffery L Milleman, DDS, MPA
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Salus Research, Inc
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Salus Research, Inc
Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lobene RR, Soparkar PM, Newman MB. Use of dental floss. Effect on plaque and gingivitis. Clin Prev Dent. 1982 Jan-Feb;4(1):5-8. No abstract available.
Turesky S, Gilmore ND, Glickman I. Reduced plaque formation by the chloromethyl analogue of victamine C. J Periodontol. 1970 Jan;41(1):41-3. doi: 10.1902/jop.1970.41.41.41. No abstract available.
QUIGLEY GA, HEIN JW. Comparative cleansing efficiency of manual and power brushing. J Am Dent Assoc. 1962 Jul;65:26-9. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1962.0184. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Protegera-2023-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.