Evaluation and Comparison of a Novel Dentrifice Formulation on Plaque Removal

NCT ID: NCT06082869

Last Updated: 2023-10-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

EARLY_PHASE1

Total Enrollment

82 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-01-30

Study Completion Date

2023-02-23

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To evaluate and compare plaque removal efficacy and safety of a novel dentifrice formulation immediately after the first supervised use and following one week of twice, daily use at home.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Study participants brushed their teeth for one minute, two times daily, for seven days.

Participants who met study entry criteria were randomized to either the test (Protegera™) or control (Crest™ Cavity Protection) toothpaste, and each were given the same straight, soft bristled toothbrush to use throughout the study.

On Day 1, participants were given an oral exam, and a pre-brushing plaque score was recorded. Participants then brushed their teeth for one minute under supervision, and a post-brushing plaque score was recorded.

On Day 7, participants were given an oral exam, and a pre-brushing plaque score was recorded. Participants then brushed their teeth for one minute under supervision, and a post-brushing plaque score was recorded.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dental Plaque

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Randomized, single-center, examiner-blinded, parallel design clinical trial.
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors
The investigators performing plaque scoring, study coordinators entering plaque scores and handling data, and the statistician performing the data analysis were all blinded to the treatment regimen

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Experimental

Protegera™ toothpaste (NaF), brushing twice daily for one minute

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Protegera™ toothpaste (NaF)

Intervention Type DRUG

Plaque Reduction

Control

Crest™ Cavity Protection toothpaste (NaF), brushing twice daily for one minute

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Crest™ Cavity Protection toothpaste (NaF)

Intervention Type DRUG

Plaque Reduction

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Protegera™ toothpaste (NaF)

Plaque Reduction

Intervention Type DRUG

Crest™ Cavity Protection toothpaste (NaF)

Plaque Reduction

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Have been males and females aged 18 to 69, in good general health.
2. Have read and signed an Informed Consent Form.
3. Have been in good health based on medical history review by the Principal Investigator.
4. Have had a minimum of 18 natural teeth with scorable facial and lingual surfaces. Teeth that were grossly carious, orthodontically banded, restorations such as crowns, veneers or implants, exhibit general cervical abrasion and/or enamel abrasion, or third molars were not included in the tooth count.
5. (If female of child bearing age) have been using an established method of birth control (systemic contraceptives such as birth control pills, injectable contraceptive or patch contraceptives, partner with vasectomy, condom with additional spermicide, IUD or abstinence).
6. Have had a mean full-mouth pre-brushing plaque score (Soparkar Modification1 of the Turesky Modification2 of the plaque index of Quigley and Hein.3) of ≥ 2.00 at the baseline visit.
7. Have agreed not to have a dental prophylaxis or any other elective, non-emergency dental procedures (other than those provided during the study) any time during the 7-day study.
8. Have been willing to refrain from all oral hygiene procedures (including chewing gum) for 24 hrs. and refrained from eating, drinking and smoking for approximately 2 hours prior to Visits 1 \& 2.
9. Have agreed to refrain from use of all oral hygiene products (i.e., floss, mouthwash, etc.), other than the toothbrush and toothpaste supplied, for the duration of the 7-day study.
10. Have agreed to comply with the conditions and schedule of the study.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Had any known allergies or sensitivities to marketed dentifrice or oral hygiene products.
2. Had any physical limitations or restrictions which might preclude normal tooth brushing.
3. Had existing serious medical condition or transmittable disease as determined after review of the medical history form. These will include but not be limited to: active hepatitis, tuberculosis, AIDS, asthma, bleeding disorder, diabetes, cirrhosis, leukemia, renal disease, sarcoidosis, vascular disease, thrush, or leukoplakia.
4. Self-reported as pregnant or nursing female.
5. Required antibiotic therapy within 30-days prior to study treatment.
6. Had a history of adverse effects, oral soft or hard tissue sensitivity, to any ingredient in the test materials.
7. Had received therapy with any medications, currently or within the last 30 days, which might interfere with the outcome of the study by affecting tissue condition, or salivation, particularly chronic therapy or long-term use, as determined by the investigator.
8. Had severe periodontal disease or being actively treated for periodontal disease.
9. Had fixed or removable orthodontic appliances, bridges, peri/oral piercings, or removable partial dentures.
10. Had significant oral soft tissue pathology based on a visual examination baseline.
11. Had evidence of poor oral hygiene or rampant dental caries or presence of extrinsic stain or calculus deposits that may interfere with plaque assessments.
12. Had received a dental prophylaxis within 30-days prior to Visit 1.
13. Had participated in another dental research study within 30-days prior to Visit 1.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

69 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Protegera, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jeffery L Milleman, DDS, MPA

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Salus Research, Inc

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Salus Research, Inc

Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lobene RR, Soparkar PM, Newman MB. Use of dental floss. Effect on plaque and gingivitis. Clin Prev Dent. 1982 Jan-Feb;4(1):5-8. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 6980082 (View on PubMed)

Turesky S, Gilmore ND, Glickman I. Reduced plaque formation by the chloromethyl analogue of victamine C. J Periodontol. 1970 Jan;41(1):41-3. doi: 10.1902/jop.1970.41.41.41. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 5264376 (View on PubMed)

QUIGLEY GA, HEIN JW. Comparative cleansing efficiency of manual and power brushing. J Am Dent Assoc. 1962 Jul;65:26-9. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1962.0184. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 14489483 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Protegera-2023-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Compare Anti-inflammatory Dentifrices
NCT00762528 COMPLETED PHASE4
Clinical Study to Evaluate Dental Plaque
NCT00758290 COMPLETED PHASE3