GaslEss Macular Hole Surgery

NCT ID: NCT06079593

Last Updated: 2023-12-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-01-01

Study Completion Date

2026-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Macular holes are a hole in the centre of the retina, the light-sensing layer in the back of the eye. They cause a central 'blind spot' in the vision, which can be very disabling for patients. Standard surgery involves injecting a large gas bubble inside the eye. This takes 4-8 weeks to leave the eye. During this time vision is greatly reduced in the eye. This limits patients' ability to drive and work. Gas causes clouding of the natural lens in the eye (cataract). The gas can also raise pressure inside the eye, causing pain and sometimes loss of vision. Patients cannot fly or have certain medicines until the gas absorbs.

Critically, most patients position face down for 50 minutes out of every hour for a week after surgery. This is to float the gas bubble onto the macula. Head positioning is particularly difficult. It very often causes pain in the neck, back, arms and legs. Rarely, blood clots can form in the legs and be life-threatening if they dislodge and travel to the lungs. Head positioning also places a large burden on those caring for the patient.

The gases are 'greenhouse' gases and cause damage to the environment, for about 3,200 years.

This study looks at a new surgical technique for treating macular holes. The new technique aims to make patients' recovery from surgery easier, and safer.

The purpose of this study therefore is to compare two treatments:

* Standard macular hole surgery with gas tamponade
* Novel macular hole surgery without tamponade Gathering feasibility data to inform a future fully powered trial

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The investigators are testing a new surgical technique, that does not use the gas bubble and face down positioning. Instead, a licensed surgical gel and thin flap of retinal tissue seal the macular hole. Early small studies suggest the new technique is safe and works as well as standard surgery.

The investigators will invite 60 people with macular hole to take part in the study. Half will be randomly allocated to the new technique and half to standard surgery. All participants will return at regular intervals after surgery for review. The investigators will test their vision, examine their eyes, and ask participants to complete questionnaires about their treatment and vision.

The investigators aim to examine if the technique appears safe and works well at closing macular holes. It will also inform if a larger clinical trial is possible.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Macular Holes

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
Images will be graded in a masked fashion

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Gasless Surgery

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Gasless Macular hole surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Pars plana vitrectomy to treat full thickness macular hole, with internal limiting membrane flap and ophthalmic viscosurgical device covering

Standard surgery with gas tamponade

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standard Macular hole surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Pars plana vitrectomy to treat full thickness macular hole, with internal limiting membrane peel, and C2F6 tamponade

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Gasless Macular hole surgery

Pars plana vitrectomy to treat full thickness macular hole, with internal limiting membrane flap and ophthalmic viscosurgical device covering

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Standard Macular hole surgery

Pars plana vitrectomy to treat full thickness macular hole, with internal limiting membrane peel, and C2F6 tamponade

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Requiring PPV to treat idiopathic (primary) FTMH.
* 18 years or older
* ETDRS BCVA letter score of 1 or better in the study eye
* Able to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

General:

* Hypersensitivity to hyaluronate or other components of Healon Pro® viscoelastic
* Any major illness or major surgical procedure within 4 weeks
* Any other condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would prevent the participant from granting informed consent or complying with the protocol

Study eye

* Previous vitreoretinal surgery, retinopexy, open-globe injury, or endophthalmitis
* Presence of fibrotic retinal proliferation or central epiretinal membrane (within 1 disc diameter of the fovea)
* Aphakia
* Current or former myopia greater than 6 dioptres
* Current or previous posterior uveitis or choroiditis
* Presence of other ocular co-morbidity that, in the opinion of the investigator, is likely to impair BCVA postoperatively or affect FTMH closure
* Current ocular or periocular infection, other than mild or moderate blepharitis
* Lens or media opacity that preclude adequate retinal assessment and imaging
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

100 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

King's College Hospital NHS Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Timothy Jackson, PhD, FRCOphth

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

King's College London & King's College Hospital

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

George Murphy, MB BCh BAO, FRCOphth

Role: CONTACT

Phone: (+)44 2032991297 ext 31297

Email: [email protected]

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

204994

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id