Comparison of Efficacy Between Conservative Versus Operative Management of Carpel Tunnel Syndrome
NCT ID: NCT06060314
Last Updated: 2023-09-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-03-03
2022-09-03
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The sample size was calculated by WHO Sample Size calculator with 90% 10 efficacy of surgical treatment and 59.1% 11 efficacy of conservative treatment, with 80% power of test and 5% significance level. Nonprobability consecutive sampling technique was used to gather the sample for this trial.
Inclusion Criteria: Patients of either gender, aged between 18 to 60 years presented with symptoms of numbness at night, pain, or tingling sensation in the fingers particularly at night diagnosed for Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) by consultant orthopedic surgeon on physical examination were included in the study.
Exclusion Criteria: Patients already under treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) were excluded.
Written informed consent was also taken from all the study participants after a complete description. Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) was diagnosed by consultant orthopedic surgeon on physical examination having symptoms of numbness at night, pain, or tingling sensation in the fingers particularly at night. To ensure randomization, the lottery method was used to allocate the patients to study groups. Patients in Group A were treated conservatively i.e Splinting in neutral position of wrist for 6 wks min at night and during the day as preferred while patients in Group B were managed through surgical intervention i.e open carpal tunnel release (OCTR). Patients were assessed during a follow up visit at 3rd month measured using functional status scale of the Boston questionnaire (BQ). The Functional Status Scale (FSS) from the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire is an 8-item questionnaire originally developed by Levine et al. \[10\] to assess functional abilities in patients with CTS. Each item of the FSS is rated on a scale from "1" "no difficulty" to "5" "unable." The overall score for the FSS was calculated as the mean of the completed items, and ranges from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicated greater disability. Efficacy was determined in terms of functional improvement from the baseline. An improvement of '2' points from the baseline was termed efficacious.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients
Patients presented with symptoms of numbness at night, pain, or tingling sensation in the fingers particularly at night diagnosed by a consultant orthopedic surgeon on physical examination.
Conservative Approach
Patients in Group A were treated conservatively i.e Splinting in neutral position of wrist for 6 wks min at night and during the day as preferred
Surgical Approach
Patients in Group B were managed through surgical intervention i.e open carpal tunnel release (OCTR)
Principle Investigator
The principal investigator will carry out the whole study.
Conservative Approach
Patients in Group A were treated conservatively i.e Splinting in neutral position of wrist for 6 wks min at night and during the day as preferred
Surgical Approach
Patients in Group B were managed through surgical intervention i.e open carpal tunnel release (OCTR)
Consultant Orthopedic Surgeon
Consultant Orthopedic Surgeon will be outcome assessor.
Conservative Approach
Patients in Group A were treated conservatively i.e Splinting in neutral position of wrist for 6 wks min at night and during the day as preferred
Surgical Approach
Patients in Group B were managed through surgical intervention i.e open carpal tunnel release (OCTR)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Conservative Approach
Patients in Group A were treated conservatively i.e Splinting in neutral position of wrist for 6 wks min at night and during the day as preferred
Surgical Approach
Patients in Group B were managed through surgical intervention i.e open carpal tunnel release (OCTR)
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Combined Military Hospital Abbottabad
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Muhammad Adnan Afsar
Major Doctor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Muhammad Ad Afsar
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Combined Military Hospital Abbottabad
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Combined Military Hospital Abbottabad
Abbottabad, Khyber Pukhtunkhwa, Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Combined Military Hospital Ab
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id