TANGO-LIVER Three Arm Nuclear Growth Observation in Liver Surgery

NCT ID: NCT06050200

Last Updated: 2025-04-01

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: RECRUITING
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Total Enrollment: 154 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2024-08-28
• Study Completion Date: 2029-05-31

Brief Summary

Liver resection is the treatment of choice in patients with malignant liver lesions. Unfortunately, the surgery is not always an option, as in same patients the future remnant liver (FRL) is too small to supply all the functions. Therefore, some additional methods have been proposed to increase the size of the FRL.

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of three methods of increasing the future remnant liver - Portal Vein Embolization (PVE) - embolization of one of the portal branches; Liver Vein Deprivation (LVD) - embolization both of the portal branch as well as the hepatic vein; and partial ALPPS (Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein Ligation for Staged hepatectomy) - ligation of portal vein branch with partial liver transection.

The efficacy of those three methods will be assessed both by analyzing the volumetric increase (by computer tomography scans) and by functional increase (by 99mTc-mebrofenin scintigraphy). Functional assessment of the liver hypertrophy seems to be of crucial importance, as some of the previous studies suggest that there might be a significant discrepancy in the increase of size comparing to the increase of function.

This is a prospective, interventional randomized study. The study group (154 patients) will consist of patients being considered as candidates for major hepatic resection, after inducing hypertrophy of the future remnant liver.

The primary study hypothesis is greater efficacy of ALPPS in preparing patients for large hepatic resection by inducing hypertrophy of the future remnant liver, as compared both to PVE and LVD.

In case of unsuccessful induction of hypertrophy by the embolization techniques, patients may be qualified to rescue ALPPS procedure.

Primary end-point:

Percentage of patients with successful resection (patients, who gained sufficient increase of the FRL to proceed to the liver resection) with no post-surgical 90-day mortality.

Secondary end-points:

1. the rate and degree of volume increase in different groups

2. the rate and degree of functional increase in different groups

3. CCI index and complication rate >=3 degree according to the Clavien-Dindo classification after the first stage of treatment

4. CCI index and complication rate >=3 degree according to the Clavien-Dindo classification after the second stage of treatment

5. overall duration of hospital stay

Patient will be randomly assigned to the three study groups. All patients will undergo an abdominal contrast enhanced computed tomography and 99mTc-mebrofenin scintigraphy prior to the first stage of treatment. During the first stage of treatment, patients will undergo, according to their group:

1. Embolization of portal vein branch (PVE, portal vein embolization)

2. Embolization of both portal vein branch and hepatic vein (LVD, liver venous deprivation)

3. Partial ALPPS (Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein Ligation for Staged hepatectomy) - ligation of portal vein branch with partial liver transection, preferentially by laparoscopic technique Computed tomography scans and scintigraphy will be repeated at day 7, 14 and 21 after the first stage of treatment. The second stage of treatment, the liver resection, will be performed after achievement of sufficient mebrofenin clearance rate (>=2,69%/min/m2). In case of failure to reach the desired clearance rate, the measurements will be continued every 7 days up to day 42. In case of uncertainty and discrepancy between the volumetric assessment in the computed tomography scan and the mebrofenin scintigraphy, it will be allowed to proceed to stage two (partial hepatectomy) after joint consultation of at least 3 hepatobiliary surgeons, 1 radiologist and 1 nuclear medicine specialist. Routine blood tests will be performed according to the standard procedure in the Department, depending on the patient clinical status. An additional blood sample will be collected from patients (after receiving and additional informed consent from the patient) and will be stored in the biobank.

All patients will be monitored for surgical and 90-day complications. The volume increase after first stage of treatment, the functional increase after first stage of treatment, percentage of patients successfully proceeding to the second stage of treatment and complication rate will be calculated.

The percentage of patients with complications >= 3 degree in Clavien-Dindo classification and CCI index for each patient will be calculated.

Furthermore, the blood test results will be assessed to search for associations with patients' outcomes. Any possible differences in terms of baseline patients characteristics between groups will be addressed.

Statistical analysis will be performed using U Mann-Whitney test, exact Fisher's test, logistic regression, general linear models, Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. All three groups will be assessed in terms of occurrence of primary and secondary end-points.

Detailed Description

Liver resection is the treatment of choice in patients with malignant liver lesions. Unfortunately, the surgery is not always an option, as in same patients the future remnant liver (FRL) is too small to supply all the functions. Therefore, some additional methods have been proposed to increase the size of the FRL. Among the most widely used ones are: Portal Vein Embolization (PVE) - embolization of one of the portal branches; Liver Vein Deprivation (LVD) - embolization both of the portal branch as well as the hepatic vein and partial ALPPS (Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein Ligation for Staged hepatectomy) - ligation of portal vein branch with partial liver transection.

However, for the time being none of this methods has been proven to provide superior results in comparison to other, and all of them are widely used in different centers. Most of the previously published papers were retrospective in nature and as for now there was no randomized trial conducted to compare all three of them. What is more, most of the previously published papers focused on the volumetric increase, based solely on the computed tomography analysis. The most important is however the functional increase, not the increase in size. The functional increase can be assessed in the 99mTc-mebrofenin scintigraphy, which enables to assess the liver function in a chosen part of the liver.

Some of the previously published papers indicate that there might be a significant discrepancy in the increase of size comparing to the increase of function, which is critically important in the clinical practice.

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of three methods of increasing the future remnant liver - PVE, LVD and ALPPS in patients in whom liver resection is considered.

METHODS:

This is a prospective, interventional randomized study. Patients will be randomly assigned to three groups in a 12:71:71 ratio: PVE, LVD and ALPPS groups, respectively.

Randomization will be performed directly after recruitment. The study group will consist of patients being considered as candidates for major hepatic resection, after inducing hypertrophy of the future remnant liver.

Inclusion criteria:

1. age >= 18 years

2. patients qualified for liver resection

3. future remnant liver <30% of standard liver volume

4. written informed consent

Exclusion criteria:

1. liver cirrhosis

2. pregnancy

3. poor general health status or comorbidities excluding general anesthesia or hepatic resection

4. contraindications to iodine contrast agents

Hypothesis and study group:

The primary study hypothesis is greater efficacy of ALPPS in preparing patients for large hepatic resection by inducing hypertrophy of the future remnant liver, as compared both to PVE and LVD. Basing on previously published studies following success rates (as percentage of patients completing the second stage of treatment, the hepatic resection) have been assumed: 57% for PVE, 73% for LVD and 91% for ALPPS.

Assuming the thresholds for type I and type II error of 5% and 20% respectively, the calculated size of the study group should be 154 patients, more specifically 12 in the PVE group, 71 in the LVD group and 71 in the ALPPS group.

Special surveillance will be applied to patients in the PVE group and in case of low efficacy (<50%) in the first 6 patients, randomization to this group will be withheld.

Moreover, in case of unsuccessful induction of hypertrophy by the embolization techniques, patients may be qualified to rescue ALPPS procedure.

Primary end-point:

Percentage of patients with successful resection (patients, who gained sufficient increase of the FRL to proceed to the liver resection) with no post-surgical 90-day mortality.

Secondary end-points:

1. the rate and degree of volume increase in different groups

2. the rate and degree of functional increase in different groups

3. CCI index and complication rate >=3 degree according to the Clavien-Dindo classification after the first stage of treatment

4. CCI index and complication rate >=3 degree according to the Clavien-Dindo classification after the second stage of treatment

5. overall duration of hospital stay

Patient will be randomly assigned to the three study groups. All patients will undergo an abdominal contrast enhanced computed tomography and 99mTc-mebrofenin scintigraphy prior to the first stage of treatment. During the first stage of treatment, patients will undergo, according to their group:

1. Embolization of portal vein branch (PVE, portal vein embolization)

2. Embolization of both portal vein branch and hepatic vein (LVD, liver venous deprivation)

3. Partial ALPPS (Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein Ligation for Staged hepatectomy) - ligation of portal vein branch with partial liver transection, preferentially by laparoscopic technique

Computed tomography scans and scintigraphy will be repeated at day 7, 14 and 21 after the first stage of treatment. The second stage of treatment, the liver resection, will be performed after achievement of sufficient mebrofenin clearance rate (>=2,69%/min/m2). In case of failure to reach the desired clearance rate, the measurements will be continued every 7 days up to date 42. In case of uncertainty and discrepancy between the volumetric assessment in the computed tomography scan and the mebrofenin scintigraphy, it will be allowed to proceed to stage two (partial hepatectomy) after joint consultation of at least 3 hepatobiliary surgeons, 1 radiologist and 1 nuclear medicine specialist.

Routine blood tests such as morphology, serum bilirubin and creatinine concentration, transaminase activity, gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase or INR will be performed according to the standard procedure in the Department of Liver, Transplant and General Surgery, namely at day 0 and 1 and every 2-3 days or more frequent in the next days, depending on the patient clinical status. An additional blood sample will be collected from patients (after receiving and additional informed consent from the patient) and will be stored in the biobank (according to "Quality Standards for Polish Biobanks" v.2.00). The samples will be stored at the LBBK biobank at Medical University of Warsaw.

All patients will be monitored for surgical and 90-day complications. The volume increase after first stage of treatment, the functional increase after first stage of treatment, percentage of patients successfully proceeding to the second stage of treatment and complication rate will be calculated.

The percentage of patients with complications >= 3 degree in Clavien-Dindo classification and CCI index for each patient will be calculated.

Furthermore, the blood test results will be assessed to search for associations with patients' outcomes. Any possible differences in terms of baseline patients characteristics between groups will be addressed.

Statistical analysis will be performed using U Mann-Whitney test, exact Fisher's test, logistic regression, general linear models, Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. All three groups will be assessed in terms of occurrence of primary and secondary end-points.

The study is designed to last 6 years, from 1st June 2023 to 31st May 2029. The firsts four months are planned for the initiation of the study, the following months for recruitment, intervention and observation and the last two months for analyzing the results.

After discharge from the hospital, 2 control visit will be scheduled for each patient, 30 and 90 days after the liver resection. Further treatment will be continued in local oncological centers.

Conditions

Liver Metastases; Liver Cancer; Liver Neoplasms; Liver Metastasis Colon Cancer

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Primary Study Purpose: TREATMENT
• Blinding Strategy: DOUBLE

Study Groups

PVE

Portal Vein Embolisation Patients in this group will undergo embolisation of branch of portal vein (interventional radiological procedure)

Group Type: ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

PVE

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

The procedure is performed under general anesthesia. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous, transhepatic puncture of the branch of the portal vein is performed and a vascular sheath is inserted on the guidewire. A system of catheters and guidewires is inserted through the sheath. Embolization is performed using a homogeneous mixture of Glubran 2 glue and Lipiodol (volume ratio 1:8-1:9). After filling the entire volume of the branch of the portal vein, all catheters, guidewires and the vascular sheaths are removed. A dressing is left over the access site and removed the next day. After treatment the patient is given analgesics and antipyretics if necessary.

LVD

Liver Venous Deprivation Patients in this group will undergo simultaneous embolization of branch of the portal vein and one or two hepatic veins (interventional radiological procedure)

Group Type: ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

LVD

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

The procedure is performed under general anesthesia. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous, transhepatic puncture of the branch of the portal vein is performed and a vascular sheath is inserted on the guidewire. A system of catheters and guidewires is inserted through the sheath. A similar puncture of the hepatic vein or veins is then performed; sometimes with access via the internal jugular vein. Embolization of the portal branch is performed using a homogeneous mixture of Glubran 2 glue and Lipiodol (volume ratio 1:8-1:9). Embolization of the right hepatic vein or veins begins with the insertion of a vascular plug (Amplatzer) approx. 2 cm from the confluence of the vein(s). The remaining part of the hepatic vein(s) is then filled with a homogeneous mixture of histacryl glue and Lipiodol (volume ratio 1:1).

A dressing is left over the access site and removed the next day; patient is given analgesics and antipyretics if necessary.

ALPPS

Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein Ligation for Staged hepatectomy: Patients in this group will undergo surgical ligation of portal vein branch with partial liver transection (surgical procedure)

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

ALPPS

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

The ALPPS procedure will be performed in the operating theatre, under general anesthesia, preferably using a minimally invasive (laparoscopic) technique.

The procedure consists of surgical ligation or clipping of the branch of the portal vein with a vascular clip and in partial transection of the parenchyma at the plane of the future resection planned in the second stage (partial transection, approx. 75% of the transection plane).

Interventions

PVE

The procedure is performed under general anesthesia. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous, transhepatic puncture of the branch of the portal vein is performed and a vascular sheath is inserted on the guidewire. A system of catheters and guidewires is inserted through the sheath. Embolization is performed using a homogeneous mixture of Glubran 2 glue and Lipiodol (volume ratio 1:8-1:9). After filling the entire volume of the branch of the portal vein, all catheters, guidewires and the vascular sheaths are removed. A dressing is left over the access site and removed the next day. After treatment the patient is given analgesics and antipyretics if necessary.

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

LVD

The procedure is performed under general anesthesia. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous, transhepatic puncture of the branch of the portal vein is performed and a vascular sheath is inserted on the guidewire. A system of catheters and guidewires is inserted through the sheath. A similar puncture of the hepatic vein or veins is then performed; sometimes with access via the internal jugular vein. Embolization of the portal branch is performed using a homogeneous mixture of Glubran 2 glue and Lipiodol (volume ratio 1:8-1:9). Embolization of the right hepatic vein or veins begins with the insertion of a vascular plug (Amplatzer) approx. 2 cm from the confluence of the vein(s). The remaining part of the hepatic vein(s) is then filled with a homogeneous mixture of histacryl glue and Lipiodol (volume ratio 1:1).

A dressing is left over the access site and removed the next day; patient is given analgesics and antipyretics if necessary.

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

ALPPS

The ALPPS procedure will be performed in the operating theatre, under general anesthesia, preferably using a minimally invasive (laparoscopic) technique.

The procedure consists of surgical ligation or clipping of the branch of the portal vein with a vascular clip and in partial transection of the parenchyma at the plane of the future resection planned in the second stage (partial transection, approx. 75% of the transection plane).

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

portal vein embolization; liver venous deprivation; Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein Ligation for Staged hepatectomy

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• age >= 18 years
• patients qualified for liver resection
• future remnant liver <30% of standard liver volume
• written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

• liver cirrhosis
• pregnancy
• poor general health status or comorbidities excluding general anesthesia or hepatic resection
• contraindications to iodine contrast agents

• Minimum Eligible Age: 18 Years
• Maximum Eligible Age: 80 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

Medical Research Agency, Poland

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role: collaborator

Medical University of Warsaw

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Responsibility Role: SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Karolina Grąt, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Medical University of Warsaw

Locations

Second Department of Clinical Radiology

Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship, Poland

Site Status: RECRUITING

Countries

Poland

Central Contacts

Karolina Grąt, PhD

Role: CONTACT

karolina.grat@wum.edu.pl

+48225992300

Facility Contacts

Karolina Grąt, PhD

Role: primary

karolina.grat@wum.edu.pl

+48225992300

Other Identifiers

ABM24

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id