Trial Outcomes & Findings for Testing Preliminary Effectiveness of a Community Health Worker (CHW) Training Program on Caregiving (NCT NCT06049043)
NCT ID: NCT06049043
Last Updated: 2025-04-11
Results Overview
We asked participants 16 identically worded knowledge-based multiple-choice questions during the pretest and posttest. For each participant, we averaged their correct scores from these knowledge questions, resulting in a score that ranged from 0 to 100, with 0 as the minimum score and 100 as the maximum score. Higher scores indicate better outcomes. We then averaged these individual scores across all participants to create a composite average knowledge score for group comparisons, also ranging from 0 to 100.
COMPLETED
NA
107 participants
Baseline
2025-04-11
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Intervention to Help Orient Men to Excel (IN-HOME)
Professional development training for CHWs on African American and Latino male caregiver needs
Intervention to Help Orient Men to Excel (IN-HOME): A multi module online training
|
Control
AARP's English "Care at Home" resource webpage
AARP's English "Care at Home" resource webpage: Caregiver information from the American Association of Retired Persons
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
55
|
52
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
44
|
43
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
11
|
9
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Intervention to Help Orient Men to Excel (IN-HOME)
Professional development training for CHWs on African American and Latino male caregiver needs
Intervention to Help Orient Men to Excel (IN-HOME): A multi module online training
|
Control
AARP's English "Care at Home" resource webpage
AARP's English "Care at Home" resource webpage: Caregiver information from the American Association of Retired Persons
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
11
|
9
|
Baseline Characteristics
Testing Preliminary Effectiveness of a Community Health Worker (CHW) Training Program on Caregiving
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Intervention to Help Orient Men to Excel (IN-HOME)
n=44 Participants
Professional development training for CHWs on African American and Latino male caregiver needs
Intervention to Help Orient Men to Excel (IN-HOME): A multi module online training
|
Control
n=43 Participants
AARP's English "Care at Home" resource webpage
AARP's English "Care at Home" resource webpage: Caregiver information from the American Association of Retired Persons
|
Total
n=87 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
41 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
42 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
83 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex · Male
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex · Female
|
34 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
29 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
63 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex · Prefer not answer
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
35 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
34 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
69 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
34 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
31 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
65 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Education level
High school diploma/GED
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Education level
Some college
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Education level
College degree
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
37 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Education level
Master's degree
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Education level
Professional degree
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Years of CHW experience
6 to 11 months
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Years of CHW experience
1 to 2 years
|
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
31 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Years of CHW experience
3 to 4 years
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Years of CHW experience
5 or more years
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Years of CHW experience
Prefer not to answer
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Type of CHW
Paid
|
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
24 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
49 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Type of CHW
Volunteer
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Type of CHW
Both
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Type of CHW
Prefer not answer
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Hours training
None
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Hours training
1 to 5 hours
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Hours training
6 to 10 hours
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Hours training
11 to 15 hours
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Hours training
16+ hours
|
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
62 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Trained in caregiving for older adults
Yes
|
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
44 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Trained in caregiving for older adults
No
|
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
39 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Trained in caregiving for older adults
I don't know
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselineWe asked participants 16 identically worded knowledge-based multiple-choice questions during the pretest and posttest. For each participant, we averaged their correct scores from these knowledge questions, resulting in a score that ranged from 0 to 100, with 0 as the minimum score and 100 as the maximum score. Higher scores indicate better outcomes. We then averaged these individual scores across all participants to create a composite average knowledge score for group comparisons, also ranging from 0 to 100.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention to Help Orient Men to Excel (IN-HOME)
n=40 Participants
Professional development training for CHWs on African American and Latino male caregiver needs
Intervention to Help Orient Men to Excel (IN-HOME): A multi module online training
|
Control
n=39 Participants
AARP's English "Care at Home" resource webpage
AARP's English "Care at Home" resource webpage: Caregiver information from the American Association of Retired Persons
|
|---|---|---|
|
Knowledge Pretest
|
79.84 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.02
|
84.94 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.14
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselineWe asked participants eight identically worded skills-based multiple-choice questions at pretest and posttest. For each participant, we averaged their correct scores from these skills questions, resulting in a score that ranged from 0 to 100, with 0 as the minimum score and 100 as the maximum score. Higher scores indicate better outcomes. We then averaged these individual scores across all participants to create a composite average skills score for group comparisons, also ranging from 0 to 100.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention to Help Orient Men to Excel (IN-HOME)
n=42 Participants
Professional development training for CHWs on African American and Latino male caregiver needs
Intervention to Help Orient Men to Excel (IN-HOME): A multi module online training
|
Control
n=41 Participants
AARP's English "Care at Home" resource webpage
AARP's English "Care at Home" resource webpage: Caregiver information from the American Association of Retired Persons
|
|---|---|---|
|
Skills Pretest
|
80.36 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.29
|
84.15 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.73
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselineWe asked participants 15 identically worded questions relating to their perceived self-efficacy/confidence in providing outreach to male caregivers. Each answer choice was a 10-point confidence rating scale, ranging from 1 (not very confident) to 10 (very confident), with higher scores indicating better outcomes. We averaged self-efficacy scores across all self-efficacy questions for each participant, then averaged these scores across all participants for group comparisons.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention to Help Orient Men to Excel (IN-HOME)
n=38 Participants
Professional development training for CHWs on African American and Latino male caregiver needs
Intervention to Help Orient Men to Excel (IN-HOME): A multi module online training
|
Control
n=41 Participants
AARP's English "Care at Home" resource webpage
AARP's English "Care at Home" resource webpage: Caregiver information from the American Association of Retired Persons
|
|---|---|---|
|
Self-efficacy Pretest
|
7.25 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.00
|
7.03 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.93
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 weeksWe asked participants 16 identically worded knowledge-based multiple-choice questions during the pretest and posttest. For each participant, we averaged their correct scores from these knowledge questions, resulting in a score that ranged from 0 to 100, with 0 as the minimum score and 100 as the maximum score. Higher scores indicate better outcomes. We then averaged these individual scores across all participants to create a composite average knowledge score for group comparisons, also ranging from 0 to 100.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention to Help Orient Men to Excel (IN-HOME)
n=43 Participants
Professional development training for CHWs on African American and Latino male caregiver needs
Intervention to Help Orient Men to Excel (IN-HOME): A multi module online training
|
Control
n=42 Participants
AARP's English "Care at Home" resource webpage
AARP's English "Care at Home" resource webpage: Caregiver information from the American Association of Retired Persons
|
|---|---|---|
|
Knowledge Posttest
|
89.83 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.37
|
83.48 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.61
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 weeksWe asked participants eight identically worded skills-based multiple-choice questions at pretest and posttest. For each participant, we averaged their correct scores from these skills questions, resulting in a score that ranged from 0 to 100, with 0 as the minimum score and 100 as the maximum score. Higher scores indicate better outcomes. We then averaged these individual scores across all participants to create a composite average skills score for group comparisons, also ranging from 0 to 100.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention to Help Orient Men to Excel (IN-HOME)
n=44 Participants
Professional development training for CHWs on African American and Latino male caregiver needs
Intervention to Help Orient Men to Excel (IN-HOME): A multi module online training
|
Control
n=42 Participants
AARP's English "Care at Home" resource webpage
AARP's English "Care at Home" resource webpage: Caregiver information from the American Association of Retired Persons
|
|---|---|---|
|
Skills Posttest
|
83.24 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.89
|
81.25 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.43
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 weeksWe asked participants 15 identically worded questions relating to their perceived self-efficacy/confidence in providing outreach to male caregivers. Each answer choice was a 10-point confidence rating scale, ranging from 1 (not very confident) to 10 (very confident), with higher scores indicating better outcomes. We averaged self-efficacy scores across all self-efficacy questions for each participant, then averaged these scores across all participants for group comparisons.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention to Help Orient Men to Excel (IN-HOME)
n=40 Participants
Professional development training for CHWs on African American and Latino male caregiver needs
Intervention to Help Orient Men to Excel (IN-HOME): A multi module online training
|
Control
n=40 Participants
AARP's English "Care at Home" resource webpage
AARP's English "Care at Home" resource webpage: Caregiver information from the American Association of Retired Persons
|
|---|---|---|
|
Self-efficacy Posttest
|
8.55 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.17
|
8.01 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.63
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 weeksWe asked participants six identically worded questions relating to their perceived preparedness to deliver male caregiver outreach at pretest and posttest. Each answer choice was a 10-point confidence rating scale, ranging from 1 (not at all prepared) to 10 (very much prepared), with higher scores indicating better outcomes. We averaged scores from each preparedness question for each participant, then averaged these scores across all participants for group comparisons.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention to Help Orient Men to Excel (IN-HOME)
n=41 Participants
Professional development training for CHWs on African American and Latino male caregiver needs
Intervention to Help Orient Men to Excel (IN-HOME): A multi module online training
|
Control
n=41 Participants
AARP's English "Care at Home" resource webpage
AARP's English "Care at Home" resource webpage: Caregiver information from the American Association of Retired Persons
|
|---|---|---|
|
Preparedness Posttest
|
8.61 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.28
|
8.02 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.74
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselineWe asked participants six identically worded questions relating to their perceived preparedness to deliver male caregiver outreach at pretest and posttest. Each answer choice was a 10-point confidence rating scale, ranging from 1 (not at all prepared) to 10 (very much prepared), with higher scores indicating better outcomes. We averaged scores from each preparedness question for each participant, then averaged these scores across all participants for group comparisons.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention to Help Orient Men to Excel (IN-HOME)
n=41 Participants
Professional development training for CHWs on African American and Latino male caregiver needs
Intervention to Help Orient Men to Excel (IN-HOME): A multi module online training
|
Control
n=42 Participants
AARP's English "Care at Home" resource webpage
AARP's English "Care at Home" resource webpage: Caregiver information from the American Association of Retired Persons
|
|---|---|---|
|
Preparedness Pretest
|
7.05 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.98
|
7.12 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.07
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2/3 weeksWe asked intervention group participants five questions about their satisfaction with IN-HOME at posttest. All five satisfaction questions were ratings assessing the participants' perceptions of ease, relevance, engagement, usefulness, and likeliness to tell others about IN-HOME. Each answer choice ranged from 1 to 10, with 10 representing the highest and 1 representing the lowest rating. We averaged satisfaction ratings across all five questions for each intervention participant and averaged these scores across all intervention participants to create a single composite score ranging from 1 to 10, with higher scores indicating higher satisfaction.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention to Help Orient Men to Excel (IN-HOME)
n=43 Participants
Professional development training for CHWs on African American and Latino male caregiver needs
Intervention to Help Orient Men to Excel (IN-HOME): A multi module online training
|
Control
AARP's English "Care at Home" resource webpage
AARP's English "Care at Home" resource webpage: Caregiver information from the American Association of Retired Persons
|
|---|---|---|
|
Satisfaction Composite Scores at Posttest
|
8.91 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.33
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Intervention to Help Orient Men to Excel (IN-HOME)
Control
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place