Saline Enema Administration in Meconium Obstruction of Prematurity and Impact on the Resolution, Feeds, Microbiome, and Gut-brain Axis.
NCT ID: NCT06048614
Last Updated: 2025-05-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
95 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-01-02
2027-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
1. To validate the finding of our pilot study which had shown that twice-daily SE reduces the time to reach full enteral feeds in premature infant as compared to premature infant treated with Glycerine Suppository (GS), in a larger cohort. Infant with MOP fails to pass meconium in the first 48 hours of life and develop symptoms and signs like abdominal distension and feed intolerance.
2. The other aims of this study are to test whether the intervention is
1. Effective treatment for MOP
2. Reduce the duration of ICU stay
3. Reduce the rate of necrotizing enterocolitis, sepsis, Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN) days and number of intravenous catheter days
3. The study also wants to explore the impact of this intervention on the gut microbiome, gut-brain interaction and immune response of the new-born.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Glycerin Suppositories Used Prophylactically in Premature Infants (SUPP): a Pilot Randomized Placebo-controlled Trial
NCT02153606
Trial of 70% Ethanol Versus Heparin to Reduce the Rate of Central Line Infections in Children With Short Bowel Syndrome
NCT01263574
Intravenous (IV) Solutions for Dehydration in Children With Gastroenteritis
NCT01234883
Effectiveness of Sugammadex on Muscle Relaxant Reversal in Preterm Neonates
NCT04566796
Intermittent Oro-Esophageal Tube Feeding vs. Nasogastric Tube Feeding in Infants With Pierre Robin Syndrome
NCT06178562
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The incidence of meconium obstruction of prematurity (MOP) is 20-30% in extremely low birth weight (ELBW ≤ 1 kg) infants. The intervention based on the current standard of care increase the risk of laparotomy necrotizing enterocolitis, intestinal perforation, and neurodevelopmental risks posed by general anaesthesia. Our published pilot RCT demonstrated that saline enema (SE) is an effective, feasible, and safe intervention to reduce the time to reach full enteral feeds and is a potentially effective treatment for MOP in ELBW (\< 1 kg) infants.
Our primary hypothesis is that Infants with Twice-daily high-volume SE (20-40 ml/kg/day) intervention will result in reduced time to reach full enteral feeds compared to infants treated with conventional management with Glycerin suppository (GS) in (≤1.25kg) infants with MOP. Our exploratory hypothesis is that SE will have a protective effect on the gut microbiome, inflammatory and immune response in preterm infants.
Ninety-five infants born over three years in KK Hospital (KKH) and Singapore General Hospital (SGH) will be enrolled and randomized at 48 hours or later to receive SE or GS. The standardized protocol will be used for the accreditation and administration of SE. Primary, secondary, and exploratory outcomes data, including treatment failure data, will be recorded. Infants will be followed up to 36 weeks of gestation or discharge, whichever is earlier. Maternal and infant characteristics, inflammatory and immune response, and safety outcome data will be collected.
If the findings of our pilot trial are confirmed, the protocol can become the standard of care in preterm infants with MOP. Additionally, significant healthcare cost savings will be realized alongside an improved understanding of the Microbiome, immune and inflammatory response pertaining to the gut.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention Arm (Saline Enema Arm)
After randomisation, infant who allocated with intervention group will proceed with SE with normal saline (20-40ml/kg twice daily) earliest at 48 to 72 hours of age. Then continue until 2 days of yellow stools/ 110ml/kg/day of oral feeds; whichever is earlier.
SE are recommended if baby do not do bowel opening (BO) for 2 days before reaching full feeds
Saline Enema (SE)
infant who allocated with intervention group will proceed with SE with normal saline (20-40ml/kg twice daily) at 48 hours of age. Then continue until 2 days of yellow stools/ 110ml/kg/day of oral feeds; whichever is earlier.
SE are recommended if baby do not do bowel opening (BO) for 2 days before reaching full feeds
Failure to resolve the MOP with SE will be designated as treatment failure and managed with contrast enema or Laparotomy by paediatric surgeons, following a formal referral.GS is not allowed in intervention arm
Control Arm (Glycerin Suppository Arm)
Infants randomized to GS received the standard management protocol for meconium retention in the unit. GS (2,000 mg, a quarter unit, four doses 12 h apart) were administered to infants earliest at 48 hour to 72 hours of birth, with subsequent once-daily GS being administered at the discretion of the managing team. Infants who were diagnosed with meconium obstruction later in the first 2 weeks of life were also treated with glycerin suppositories for 48 hrs, with subsequent once-daily GS being administered at the discretion of the managing team.
Infants who failed to respond to glycerin suppositories were referred to the surgical team by the managing team The subsequent management of meconium retention was at the surgeon's discretion and included continued GS by the surgical team, contrast enema or surgical interventions performed in escalating order as mentioned.
Glycerin Suppository
Infants randomized to GS received the standard management protocol for meconium retention in the unit. GS (2,000 mg, a quarter unit, four doses 12 h apart) were administered to infants earliest at 48 hour to 72 hours of birth, with subsequent once-daily GS being administered at the discretion of the managing team. Infants who were diagnosed with meconium obstruction later in the first 2 weeks of life were also treated with glycerin suppositories for 48 hrs, with subsequent once-daily GS being administered at the discretion of the managing team.
Infants who failed to respond to glycerin suppositories were referred to the surgical team by the managing team The subsequent management of meconium retention was at the surgeon's discretion and included continued GS by the surgical team, contrast enema or surgical interventions performed in escalating order as mentioned.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Saline Enema (SE)
infant who allocated with intervention group will proceed with SE with normal saline (20-40ml/kg twice daily) at 48 hours of age. Then continue until 2 days of yellow stools/ 110ml/kg/day of oral feeds; whichever is earlier.
SE are recommended if baby do not do bowel opening (BO) for 2 days before reaching full feeds
Failure to resolve the MOP with SE will be designated as treatment failure and managed with contrast enema or Laparotomy by paediatric surgeons, following a formal referral.GS is not allowed in intervention arm
Glycerin Suppository
Infants randomized to GS received the standard management protocol for meconium retention in the unit. GS (2,000 mg, a quarter unit, four doses 12 h apart) were administered to infants earliest at 48 hour to 72 hours of birth, with subsequent once-daily GS being administered at the discretion of the managing team. Infants who were diagnosed with meconium obstruction later in the first 2 weeks of life were also treated with glycerin suppositories for 48 hrs, with subsequent once-daily GS being administered at the discretion of the managing team.
Infants who failed to respond to glycerin suppositories were referred to the surgical team by the managing team The subsequent management of meconium retention was at the surgeon's discretion and included continued GS by the surgical team, contrast enema or surgical interventions performed in escalating order as mentioned.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. Birth weight 500 - 1250 gram
2. ≥ 23 weeks gestation
3. No BO for 48 hours
4. BO present but with a small amount or stain of meconium
5. Feeds intolerance or abdominal X-ray showing dilated loops of bowel
* Criteria B: For infant presenting with Late onset of MOP
1. Birth weight 500 - 1250 gram
2. ≥ 23 weeks gestation
3. Infants who passed meconium initially and develop evidence of meconium obstruction at a later age (feed intolerance or vomiting and abnormal abdominal X-ray with or without abdominal distension)
Exclusion Criteria
1. Neuromuscular disorder
2. Moderate or severe asphyxia
3. Inability to start enteral feeding, which continued for 3 consecutive days before 2 weeks of post-natal age for reasons unrelated to meconium inspissation or its complication
4. Without parental consent
5. Aggravated medical instability
6. Single mothers \< 21 years
1 Day
36 Weeks
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Singapore General Hospital
OTHER
Genome Institute of Singapore
OTHER
Translational Immunology Institute
UNKNOWN
Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School
OTHER
KK Women's and Children's Hospital
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Thowfique Kadavukarayil Ibrahim
Senior Consultant(Assistant Professor)
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Thowfique Ibrahim, FRCPCH, FAMS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Singhealth Duke-NUS Medical School, NUS and LKC Medical School
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Singapore General Hospital
Singapore, , Singapore
KK Women's and Children Hospital
Singapore, , Singapore
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Unger A, Goetzman BW, Chan C, Lyons AB 3rd, Miller MF. Nutritional practices and outcome of extremely premature infants. Am J Dis Child. 1986 Oct;140(10):1027-33. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1986.02140240073029.
Chathas MK, Paton JB, Fisher DE. Percutaneous central venous catheterization. Three years' experience in a neonatal intensive care unit. Am J Dis Child. 1990 Nov;144(11):1246-50. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1990.02150350078030.
Stoll BJ, Gordon T, Korones SB, Shankaran S, Tyson JE, Bauer CR, Fanaroff AA, Lemons JA, Donovan EF, Oh W, Stevenson DK, Ehrenkranz RA, Papile LA, Verter J, Wright LL. Late-onset sepsis in very low birth weight neonates: a report from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. J Pediatr. 1996 Jul;129(1):63-71. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(96)70191-9.
Shim SY, Kim HS, Kim DH, Kim EK, Son DW, Kim BI, Choi JH. Induction of early meconium evacuation promotes feeding tolerance in very low birth weight infants. Neonatology. 2007;92(1):67-72. doi: 10.1159/000100804. Epub 2007 Mar 14.
Krasna IH, Rosenfeld D, Salerno P. Is it necrotizing enterocolitis, microcolon of prematurity, or delayed meconium plug? A dilemma in the tiny premature infant. J Pediatr Surg. 1996 Jun;31(6):855-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(96)90153-0.
Emil S, Nguyen T, Sills J, Padilla G. Meconium obstruction in extremely low-birth-weight neonates: guidelines for diagnosis and management. J Pediatr Surg. 2004 May;39(5):731-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2004.01.027.
Haiden N, Norooz F, Klebermass-Schrehof K, Horak AS, Jilma B, Berger A, Repa A. The effect of an osmotic contrast agent on complete meconium evacuation in preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2012 Dec;130(6):e1600-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-3634. Epub 2012 Nov 26.
Broussard DL. Gastrointestinal motility in the neonate. Clin Perinatol. 1995 Mar;22(1):37-59.
Dumont RC, Rudolph CD. Development of gastrointestinal motility in the infant and child. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 1994 Dec;23(4):655-71.
Campbell BG, Couceyro P, Keana JF, Weber E. N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor-mediated contractions of the guinea pig ileum longitudinal muscle/myenteric plexus preparation: modulation by phencyclidine and glycine receptors. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1991 May;257(2):754-66.
Siddiqui MM, Drewett M, Burge DM. Meconium obstruction of prematurity. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2012 Mar;97(2):F147-50. doi: 10.1136/adc.2010.190157. Epub 2010 Nov 29.
Juang D, Snyder CL. Neonatal bowel obstruction. Surg Clin North Am. 2012 Jun;92(3):685-711, ix-x. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2012.03.008. Epub 2012 Apr 17.
Kim YJ, Kim EK, Kim ES, Kim HS, Choi JH, Cheon JE, Kim WS, Kim IO, Park KW. Recognition, diagnosis and treatment of meconium obstruction in extremely low birth weight infants. Neonatology. 2012;101(3):172-8. doi: 10.1159/000330850. Epub 2011 Oct 22.
Garza-Cox S, Keeney SE, Angel CA, Thompson LL, Swischuk LE. Meconium obstruction in the very low birth weight premature infant. Pediatrics. 2004 Jul;114(1):285-90. doi: 10.1542/peds.114.1.285.
Cho HH, Cheon JE, Choi YH, Lee SM, Kim WS, Kim IO, Shin SM, Kim EK, Kim HS, Choi JH, You SK. Ultrasound-guided contrast enema for meconium obstruction in very low birth weight infants: Factors that affect treatment success. Eur J Radiol. 2015 Oct;84(10):2024-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.06.006. Epub 2015 Jun 7.
Ibrahim T, Li Wei C, Bautista D, Sriram B, Xiangzhen Fay L, Rajadurai VS. Saline Enemas versus Glycerin Suppositories to Promote Enteral Feeding in Premature Infants: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Neonatology. 2017;112(4):347-353. doi: 10.1159/000477999. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
Paradiso VF, Briganti V, Oriolo L, Coletta R, Calisti A. Meconium obstruction in absence of cystic fibrosis in low birth weight infants: an emerging challenge from increasing survival. Ital J Pediatr. 2011 Nov 14;37:55. doi: 10.1186/1824-7288-37-55.
Livingston MH, Shawyer AC, Rosenbaum PL, Williams C, Jones SA, Walton JM. Glycerin enemas and suppositories in premature infants: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2015 Jun;135(6):1093-106. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-0143. Epub 2015 May 18.
Vinson AE, Houck CS. Neurotoxicity of Anesthesia in Children: Prevention and Treatment. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2018 Oct 13;20(12):51. doi: 10.1007/s11940-018-0536-z.
Saenz de Pipaon Marcos M, Teresa Montes Bueno M, Sanjose B, Gil M, Parada I, Amo P. Randomized controlled trial of prophylactic rectal stimulation and enemas on stooling patterns in extremely low birth weight infants. J Perinatol. 2013 Nov;33(11):858-60. doi: 10.1038/jp.2013.86. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
Nakaoka T, Nishimoto S, Tsukazaki Y, Santo K, Higashio A, Kamiyama M, Uehara S, Yoneda A, Tanaka Y, Ichiba H. Ultrasound-guided hydrostatic enema for meconium obstruction in extremely low birth weight infants: a preliminary report. Pediatr Surg Int. 2017 Sep;33(9):1019-1022. doi: 10.1007/s00383-017-4129-9. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2023/2270
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.