Effectiveness Of The Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block In Hip Surgery
NCT ID: NCT05997940
Last Updated: 2023-08-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-10-01
2023-09-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Regional anesthesia techniques are among the most effective methods of postoperative analgesia. Peripheral nerve blocks are also one of the regional anesthesia methods. Peripheral nerve blocks; They are the most ideal postoperative analgesia methods because they provide effective analgesia, reduce the need for opioids and consequently their side effects, are effective in the treatment of dynamic pain and facilitate recovery.
Patients undergoing hip surgery have very severe pain and need additional postoperative analgesics. Mobilization of patients is delayed due to pain . Depending on this , thromboembolism , deep vein The risk of nosocomial infection increases due to thrombosis , wound infection and increased length of stay.
Alleviating the pain around the hip joint capsule is an effective analgesia method in hip surgeries. The anterior capsule of the hip joint is innervated by the femoral , obturator , and accessory obturator nerves . Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block also targets these nerves. Many studies have shown that PENG block provides adequate analgesia for more than 24 hours postoperatively. PENG block is a method that is frequently used in the world and in our clinic and has a low complication rate.
In this study, the investigators aimed to show that pericapsular nerve group block performed before spinal anesthesia in hip surgeries reduces postoperative pain and decreases total opioid consumption.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effects of Pericapsular Nerve Group Block Applied in Patients Undergoing Hip Fracture Surgery.
NCT06183541
Effect of Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block for Perioperative Analgesia in Geriatric Patients With Hip Fractures
NCT05941221
Effects of Pericapsular Nerve Group Block on Postoperative Recovery for Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT06183528
Effect of Pericapsular Nerve Group Block on Postoperative Cognitive Function
NCT06736405
Comparison of Intraoperative- Postoperative Effects of Pericapsular Nerve Block and Fascia Iliaca Block in Hip Fracture
NCT06001996
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
PENG
PENG block performed before spinal anesthesia
PENG block
The PENG block was performed with the patient in the supine position at preoperative waiting room. A curvilinear low-frequency ultrasound probe (2-5 MHz) was initially placed in a transverse plane over the AIIS and then aligned with the pubic ramus by rotating the probe counterclockwise approximately 45 degrees. In this view, the IPE, the iliopsoas muscle and tendon, the femoral artery, and pectineus muscle were observed. A 22 gauge, 100 mm needle was inserted from lateral to medial in an in-plane approach to place the tip in the musculofascial plane between the psoas tendon anteriorly and the pubic ramus posteriorly. Following negative aspiration, the local anesthetic solution was injected in 5 mL increments while observing for adequate fluid spread in this plane for a total volume of 20 mL
Control
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PENG block
The PENG block was performed with the patient in the supine position at preoperative waiting room. A curvilinear low-frequency ultrasound probe (2-5 MHz) was initially placed in a transverse plane over the AIIS and then aligned with the pubic ramus by rotating the probe counterclockwise approximately 45 degrees. In this view, the IPE, the iliopsoas muscle and tendon, the femoral artery, and pectineus muscle were observed. A 22 gauge, 100 mm needle was inserted from lateral to medial in an in-plane approach to place the tip in the musculofascial plane between the psoas tendon anteriorly and the pubic ramus posteriorly. Following negative aspiration, the local anesthetic solution was injected in 5 mL increments while observing for adequate fluid spread in this plane for a total volume of 20 mL
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients over 18 years old
* Patients with ASA score I-II-III
* Patients performed spinal anesthesia for surgery
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with ASA score IV and above
* Patients who cannot be communicated
* Patients with infection at the block site
* Patients with coagulation disorders
* Patients not suitable for spinal anesthesia
* Patients with liver and kidney failure
* Patients who are allergic to the drugs used
* Patients with major complications during the operation
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Aydin Adnan Menderes University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mustafa Ogurlu
Professor Doctor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Adnan Menderes University Faculty of Medicine
Aydin, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2022/03
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.