Role of Vitamin D Therapy in Recovery From Early Neonatal Sepsis (Randomized Controlled Trial)
NCT ID: NCT05969327
Last Updated: 2023-08-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
66 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-08-14
2022-12-27
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Outcome of High Dose Vitamin D on Prognosis of Sepsis Requiring Mechanical Ventilation
NCT05244018
Vitamin D Status in Patients With Severe Sepsis
NCT02684487
Evaluation of Safety and Dosing of a Vitamin C Bundle for Sepsis Treatment in Africa
NCT04999137
Zinc Supplementation in Pediatric Sepsis
NCT05366595
7 Days Versus 14 Days of Antibiotics for Neonatal Sepsis
NCT03280147
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This is a randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted on sixty (66) full term newborns with clinical and laboratory findings of early onset of sepsis (EOS) and admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of El-Demerdash hospital of Ain Shams university and El Ahrar teaching hospital in Zagazig.
* Inclusion Criteria: full term newborns with clinical and laboratory findings of early onset of sepsis (EOS).
* Exclusion Criteria: Preterm newborn, NPO neonates , infants with maternal risk factors , such as clinical and/or histological chorioamnionitis, neonates delivered at home ,neonates to mothers with premature rupture of membrane, and major congenital abnormalities which may be predisposing factors for development of EOS.
NB: we excluded the dead cases (6 cases) in the final laboratory and clinical relation with serum Vitamin D levels after recovery because sepsis caused death to these neonates and recovery didn't occur .
Methods:
An informed consent was taken from the legal guardian of the newborns participating in the study.
Detailed history taking from all mothers of neonates in the study laying stress on vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy, sun exposure in mothers during pregnancy, place and mode of delivery. Dietetic history in all included mothers (National Nutrition institute, 2006). Clinical evaluation of all newborns for signs of neonatal sepsis.
All subjects in the study were subjected to the following:
1. Clinical Examination: General examination including vital data; temperature, pulse, respiratory rate, anthropometric measurements including weight and length (Neonatal Anthropometry): In all neonates weight (in Kg) was recorded on an electronic weighing scale at birth. Length (in cm) was recorded by measuring tape.
SDS of weight and length was calculated and plotted against appropriate growth curves (Tanner et al., 1968).
2. Laboratory Investigations: Under aseptic conditions venous blood samples was collected into sterile blood collection tubes and the following investigations was performed:
* A neonatal sepsis screen including: total leukocyte count, absolute neutrophil count, platelet count immature to total neutrophil count and C-reactive protein (CRP).
* Blood samples for complete blood count (CBC) and blood culture. All patients were initially assessed according to Newborn Scale of Sepsis.
* A total clinical score less than 10 indicated that the newborn did not have sepsis-a negative predictive value of 97%.
* Any neonate with a total clinical score greater than 10 was considered ''sick,'' possibly with sepsis. A clinical score greater than 10 is also an indicator of the need for further diagnostic evaluation (Gardner, 2008).
* Serum 25 (OH) vitamin D levels: was measured by Human Vitamin D ELISA Kit (Qualpro diagnostics, INDIA) in all newborns on the first day of sepsis, 25(OH) vitamin D levels were classified according to the guidelines of the Endocrine Society to the following reference values:
* Sufficient \>20 ng/ml (\>50 nmol/l)
* Insufficient 12-20 ng/ml (30-50 nmol/l)
* Deficient \<12 ng/ml (\<30 nmol/l) (Munns et al., 2016).
Study design : Subjects were classified into three groups :
GROUP A (conventional dose Vitamin D) those neonates who received a daily dose of oral Vitamin D of 400 IU through Ryle or mouth from onset of diagnosis till recovery from sepsis.
GROUP B (higher dose Vitamin D) those neonates who receiveda daily dose of oral vitamin D of 800 IU through ryle or mouth from onset of diagnosis till recovery from sepsis.
GROUP C (Placebo group) those neonates with early onset sepsis who did not receive any vitamin D supplementation.
Patients were matched regarding sepsis score. All 3 groups were treated using strategy of sepsis treatment.
* Reevaluation of serum Vitamin D levels for all patients on recovery(recovery was assessed by Newborn Scale of Sepsis to be less than 10).
* Serum Ca and P were measured initially for all patients upon diagnosis of EOS, and on discharge upon recovery Normal range of Ca 8.8-11.3mg/dl Normal range P 4.5-6.2 mg/dl
* Urinary Ca will be evaluated after two weeks of onset of vitamin D therapy (for patients who experience elevation of serum Ca above normal value).
Type of Study: Randomized controlled study. Study Setting: This study was conducted on sixty (66) full term newborns with clinical and laboratory findings of early onset of sepsis (EOS) and were admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of El-Demerdash hospital of Ain Shams university and El Ahrar teaching hospital in Zagazig.
* Study Period: The study took place from January 2018 to January 2021.
* Study Population: Full term newborns with early onset sepsis.
* Sampling Method: random.
* Sample Size:
Using PASS program, setting alpha error at 5% and power at 80%. After reviewing literature, no previous similar study has been done before. So assuming that NICU duration for placebo, 400IU vitamin D and 800 IU vitamin D respectively is 7±2.5, 5.5±2.5, 4±2.5 based on this, the needed sample is 20 cases per group (total 60).
• Ethical Considerations:
* The consent was conducted to the legal guardian or the parents of our patients by the investigator.
* Premature termination of oral vitamin D was mandatory for patients with abdominal distension or feeding intolerance.
* All data was treated confidentially and was not be allowed except to the principle investigator.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
FACTORIAL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
with out vitamin D
neonates without supplementation
No interventions assigned to this group
Vitamin D 400 IU
neonates with 400 IU supplementation
Vitamin D
oral supplementation of two different doses
Vitamin D 800 IU
neonates with 800 IU supplementation
Vitamin D
oral supplementation of two different doses
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Vitamin D
oral supplementation of two different doses
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Exclusion Criteria
3 Days
7 Days
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ain Shams University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mayada Ahmad Mohamed
Zagazig, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MD 438/ 2017
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.