Montpellier PROspective Cohort in Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Using Imaging and Serologic

NCT ID: NCT05962177

Last Updated: 2025-09-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

400 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-09-11

Study Completion Date

2030-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Several prospective monocentric cohorts of between 250 and 1000 patients have been set up in order to characterize more precisely the evolution of the disease. Nevertheless, due to an initial recruitment carried out in the years 2000-2010, they do not constitute a faithful representation of the patients followed in clinical routine, in particular in terms of distribution of treatments. Indeed, the introduction, about 10 years ago, of high efficacy treatments (HET) has changed the management of the disease and a significant proportion of patients not controlled by medium efficacy treatments (MET) of the disease are now stable on HET. Nevertheless, if their short-term efficacy has been clearly demonstrated, it remains important to be able to confirm the superiority of HET over MET with the help of prospective cohorts (thus ensuring a retention of patients \> 90% over the long term) analyzing all clinical and imaging biomarkers, imaging and biological data.

The measurement of cerebral atrophy and its progression is probably one of the most interesting and most easily used biomarkers that can be used clinically to assess this silent progression in these groups of patients.

The progression of brain atrophy is also dependent on many other non-modifiable but also modifiable factors outside of MS that need to be better evaluated and eventually managed.

Nevertheless, the existence of various neurological comorbidities (sleep disorders, headaches) on this atrophy has not been specifically analyzed to date. The functional assessments used in routine follow-up are most often performed in a care facility and have many limitations: lack of reproducibility, inter/intra operator variability, poor correlation with functional and quality of life scales, etc.

It is therefore extremely important to be able to identify new clinical biomarkers of disease progression of the disease by evaluating the physical capacities of the patients as precisely as possible.

This study is a single-center, prospective cohort study of a population of 400 patients with relapsing remitting MS (RRMS).

The main objective of this study is to compare, on morphological imaging criteria (T1 volumetry), the progression of brain atrophy (biomarker of disease progression) at 3 years in RRMS patients according to treatment line (MET vs HET).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Several prospective monocentric cohorts of between 250 and 1000 patients have been set up in order to characterize more precisely the evolution of the disease. Nevertheless, due to an initial recruitment carried out in the years 2000-2010, they do not constitute a faithful representation of the patients followed in clinical routine, in particular in terms of distribution of treatments. Indeed, the introduction, about 10 years ago, of high efficacy treatments (HET : Natalizumab, Fingolimod, Ocrelizumab, Rituximab, Ofatumumab, Cladribine) has changed the management of the disease and a significant proportion of patients not controlled by medium efficacy treatments (MET : Beta interferons, glatiramer acetate, teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate, monomethyl fumarate) of the disease are now stable on HET. Nevertheless, if their short-term efficacy has been clearly demonstrated, it remains important to be able to confirm the superiority of HET over MET with the help of prospective cohorts (thus ensuring a retention of patients \> 90% over the long term) analyzing all clinical and imaging biomarkers, imaging and biological data.

The measurement of cerebral atrophy and its progression is probably one of the most interesting and most easily used biomarkers that can be used clinically to assess this silent progression in these groups of patients.

The progression of brain atrophy is also dependent on many other non-modifiable but also modifiable factors outside of MS that need to be better evaluated and eventually managed.

Nevertheless, the existence of various neurological comorbidities (sleep disorders, headaches) on this atrophy has not been specifically analyzed to date. The functional assessments used in routine follow-up are most often performed in a care facility and have many limitations: lack of reproducibility, inter/intra operator variability, poor correlation with functional and quality of life scales, etc.

It is therefore extremely important to be able to identify new clinical biomarkers of disease progression of the disease by evaluating the physical capacities of the patients as precisely as possible.

This study is a single-center, prospective cohort study of a population of 400 patients with relapsing remitting MS (RRMS).

The main objective of this study is to compare, on morphological imaging criteria (T1 volumetry), the progression of brain atrophy (biomarker of disease progression) at 3 years in RRMS patients according to treatment line (MET vs HET).

3 groups of interest will be studied and included in the study:

* Group 1: RRMS with medium efficacy treatment (interferon beta, glatiramer acetate, Teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate, monomethyl fumarate) of the disease (n=175 patients)
* Group 2: RRMS with high efficacy treatment (Natalizumab, Ocrelizumab, Rituximab, Ofatumumab, Fingolimod, Cladribine: n=175 patients)
* Group 3: Untreated RRMS (n=50 patients)

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Multiple Sclerosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Relapsing-remitting Multiple sclerosis benefiting from a moderately effective treatment

Moderately effective treatment includes interferon beta, glatiramer acetate, Teriflunomide, dimethyl Fumarate and monomethyl fumarate n= 175 patients

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Intervention Type OTHER

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Blood withdrawal

Intervention Type OTHER

Blood withdrawal

Neuropsychological tests

Intervention Type OTHER

Neuropsychological tests

Relapsing-remitting Multiple sclerosis benefiting from a highly effective treatment

Highly effective treatment includes Natalizumab, Ocrelizumab, Rituximab, Ofatumumab, Fingolimod and Cladribine n= 175 patients

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Intervention Type OTHER

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Blood withdrawal

Intervention Type OTHER

Blood withdrawal

Neuropsychological tests

Intervention Type OTHER

Neuropsychological tests

Untreated relapsing-remitting Multiple sclerosis

Patients untreated for relapsing-remitting Multiple sclerosis n= 50 patients

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Intervention Type OTHER

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Blood withdrawal

Intervention Type OTHER

Blood withdrawal

Neuropsychological tests

Intervention Type OTHER

Neuropsychological tests

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Intervention Type OTHER

Blood withdrawal

Blood withdrawal

Intervention Type OTHER

Neuropsychological tests

Neuropsychological tests

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients over 18 and under 60 years of age
* Patients with Relapsing-remitting MS without relapse for at least 6 months
* EDSS\<6 at time of inclusion

Exclusion Criteria

* Secondary progressive MS or Primary progressive MS at time of inclusion
* Evidence of disease progression (clinical or radiological)
* Change in treatment within 6 months prior to inclusion
* Subject with a contraindication to MRI (claustrophobia, pacemaker, etc.)
* Inability to follow the follow-up planned by the study
* Pregnant or breastfeeding women
* Patient not affiliated to the social security system or not benefiting from such a system
* Adult protected by law or patient under guardianship or curatorship
* Failure to obtain written informed consent after a reflection period
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

59 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Montpellier

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Neurology Department, Hopital Gui de Chauliac

Montpellier, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Xavier AYRIGNAC, Medical Doctor

Role: CONTACT

0467337202

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Xavier Ayrignac, Medical Doctor

Role: primary

0467337202

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RECHMPL20_0422

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.