Sentinel Node Biopsy in Early Oral Cancers a Tertiary Cancer Centre Experience

NCT ID: NCT05950737

Last Updated: 2024-10-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

115 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-06-01

Study Completion Date

2024-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Sentinel node biopsy is a suitable alternative to END and is recommended in standard guidelines. Investigators have been doing SNB in their department to standardize the process for the last two years. This study aims to analyze the diagnostic accuracy of the SNB performed to standardize the procedure at their institute.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Elective neck dissection (END) is the standard of care in node-negative early oral cancers.

However, it is associated with morbidity predominantly of shoulder dysfunction. Moreover, nearly 55-70% are true node-negative and are over-treated with this approach. Attempts have been made to overcome this limitation and to identify true node-negative patients. Sentinel node biopsy has shown the highest diagnostic accuracy among all other options. The SN is the first echelon node that drains directly through the lymphatics from the primary tumour. The principle of SNB is based on the fact that since it is the first echelon node, it would be the first site of regional metastasis. Therefore, the metastasis is unlikely to involve other nodal levels if the SNB is negative. It is the standard of care in breast cancers and melanoma. The concept made its way into oral cavity tumours and has been explored for over a decade in this setting. The results of the multi-institutional trial by Civantos et al. reported a high NPV of 94% of this procedure in early oral cancers that were node negative. Since then, various meta-analyses have shown that SNB has a high NPV making it a strong diagnostic modality. Schilling et al. reported the 3-year results of SNB in oral cancers in a multicentric study comprising 415 patients. The authors successfully identified the SN in 99.5% of cases and reported an FNR of 14%, which was high. Despite this, the study showed a high 3-year-disease-specific survival of 94%. Recently published Phase III Randomized controlled trials have shown that the overall survival of sentinel node biopsy is comparable to END with lesser morbidity in shoulder dysfunction. The advantage of the procedure is that only 25-30% of the patients who are SNB positive need to undergo neck dissection, and it spares unnecessary neck clearance and hence limits the morbidity in the remaining 70-75% of cases. SNB is a suitable alternative to END and is recommended in standard guidelines. However, SNB has a learning curve, it is recommended that the process be standardized, and the team should perform adequate SNB, followed by the completion of neck dissection before sparing the neck based on SNB. Investigators have been doing SNB in their department to standardize the process following the publication of level I evidence. This study aims to analyze the diagnostic accuracy of the SNB performed to standardize the procedure at the investigator's institute.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

sentinel node biopsy

All patients have undergone completion neck dissection following SNB in the process of standardization. The SNB was localized by peritumoral infiltration of the nano colloid, followed by dynamic planar imaging for 30 minutes, and then SPECT was performed. The surgery was performed on the same day within 6 hours of localisation, and intraoperatively, either methylene blue or indocyanine green was used as an adjunct. Appropriately labelled sentinel nodes were assessed on the frozen section, which was then sectioned into 2-3mm slices perpendicular to the longest axis of the node and submitted entirely for microscopic evaluation. A minimum of 2 sections were evaluated, one stained with Toluidine blue and the other with rapid Haematoxylin and Eosin (HE) stain. The nodes were subsequently subjected to histopathological processing.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Sentinel node biopsy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

All patients have undergone completion neck dissection following SNB in the process of standardization.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sentinel node biopsy

All patients have undergone completion neck dissection following SNB in the process of standardization.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age between 18 to 75 years of age,
2. Biopsy-proven invasive squamous cell carcinoma involving site among tongue and buccal mucosa
3. T1 and T2 lesions as per AJCC TNM classification
4. Clinicoradiologically node negative
5. Amenable to per oral excision

Exclusion Criteria

1. Upper alveolar or palatal lesions
2. Large heterogeneous leukoplakia or other premalignant lesion
3. T3/T4 lesions
4. Lesions requiring raising of cheek flap to access for excision
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Tata Memorial Hospital

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Richa Vaish

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Richa Vaish, MS. M.Ch

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Tata Memorial Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Tata Memorial Hospital

Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

India

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Vaish R, Hawaldar R, Gupta S, Dandekar M, Shah S, Chaukar D, Pantvaidya G, Deshmukh A, Chaturvedi P, Pai P, Nair D, Nair S, Thakur M, Ghosh-Laskar S, Agarwal JP, D'Cruz AK. N0 neck trial: Does intensification of follow-up (Ultrasound + Physical Examination) influence outcomes in early-stage oral cancer? Eur J Cancer. 2024 Jun;204:114064. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114064. Epub 2024 Apr 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 38705028 (View on PubMed)

D'Cruz AK, Vaish R, Kapre N, Dandekar M, Gupta S, Hawaldar R, Agarwal JP, Pantvaidya G, Chaukar D, Deshmukh A, Kane S, Arya S, Ghosh-Laskar S, Chaturvedi P, Pai P, Nair S, Nair D, Badwe R; Head and Neck Disease Management Group. Elective versus Therapeutic Neck Dissection in Node-Negative Oral Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015 Aug 6;373(6):521-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1506007. Epub 2015 May 31.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26027881 (View on PubMed)

Civantos FJ, Zitsch RP, Schuller DE, Agrawal A, Smith RB, Nason R, Petruzelli G, Gourin CG, Wong RJ, Ferris RL, El Naggar A, Ridge JA, Paniello RC, Owzar K, McCall L, Chepeha DB, Yarbrough WG, Myers JN. Sentinel lymph node biopsy accurately stages the regional lymph nodes for T1-T2 oral squamous cell carcinomas: results of a prospective multi-institutional trial. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 10;28(8):1395-400. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.8777. Epub 2010 Feb 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20142602 (View on PubMed)

Thompson CF, St John MA, Lawson G, Grogan T, Elashoff D, Mendelsohn AH. Diagnostic value of sentinel lymph node biopsy in head and neck cancer: a meta-analysis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Jul;270(7):2115-22. doi: 10.1007/s00405-012-2320-0. Epub 2012 Dec 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23263205 (View on PubMed)

Mallo Magarinos M, Suarez Ajuria M, Marichalar Mendia X, Alvarez-Calderon Iglesias O, Chamorro Petronacci CM, Garcia Garcia A, Perez Sayans M. Diagnostic yield of sentinel lymph node biopsy in oral squamous cell carcinoma T1/T2-N0: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Oct;50(10):1271-1279. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2021.01.020. Epub 2021 Feb 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33602650 (View on PubMed)

Yang Y, Zhou J, Wu H. Diagnostic value of sentinel lymph node biopsy for cT1/T2N0 tongue squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Nov;274(11):3843-3852. doi: 10.1007/s00405-017-4740-3. Epub 2017 Sep 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28900723 (View on PubMed)

Schilling C, Stoeckli SJ, Haerle SK, Broglie MA, Huber GF, Sorensen JA, Bakholdt V, Krogdahl A, von Buchwald C, Bilde A, Sebbesen LR, Odell E, Gurney B, O'Doherty M, de Bree R, Bloemena E, Flach GB, Villarreal PM, Fresno Forcelledo MF, Junquera Gutierrez LM, Amezaga JA, Barbier L, Santamaria-Zuazua J, Moreira A, Jacome M, Vigili MG, Rahimi S, Tartaglione G, Lawson G, Nollevaux MC, Grandi C, Donner D, Bragantini E, Dequanter D, Lothaire P, Poli T, Silini EM, Sesenna E, Dolivet G, Mastronicola R, Leroux A, Sassoon I, Sloan P, McGurk M. Sentinel European Node Trial (SENT): 3-year results of sentinel node biopsy in oral cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2015 Dec;51(18):2777-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.08.023. Epub 2015 Nov 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26597442 (View on PubMed)

Garrel R, Poissonnet G, Moya Plana A, Fakhry N, Dolivet G, Lallemant B, Sarini J, Vergez S, Guelfucci B, Choussy O, Bastit V, Richard F, Costes V, Landais P, Perriard F, Daures JP, de Verbizier D, Favier V, de Boutray M. Equivalence Randomized Trial to Compare Treatment on the Basis of Sentinel Node Biopsy Versus Neck Node Dissection in Operable T1-T2N0 Oral and Oropharyngeal Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Dec 1;38(34):4010-4018. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.01661. Epub 2020 Oct 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33052754 (View on PubMed)

Hasegawa Y, Tsukahara K, Yoshimoto S, Miura K, Yokoyama J, Hirano S, Uemura H, Sugasawa M, Yoshizaki T, Homma A, Chikamatsu K, Suzuki M, Shiotani A, Matsuzuka T, Kohno N, Miyazaki M, Oze I, Matsuo K, Kosuda S, Yatabe Y; HNCMM Research Group. Neck Dissections Based on Sentinel Lymph Node Navigation Versus Elective Neck Dissections in Early Oral Cancers: A Randomized, Multicenter, and Noninferiority Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Jun 20;39(18):2025-2036. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.03637. Epub 2021 Apr 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33877855 (View on PubMed)

Vaish R, Mittal N, Mahajan A, Rane SU, Agrawal A, D'Cruz AK. Sentinel node biopsy in node negative early oral cancers: Solution to the conundrum! Oral Oncol. 2022 Nov;134:106070. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2022.106070. Epub 2022 Aug 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35988294 (View on PubMed)

Vaish R. Shifting Paradigm of the Management of Node-Negative Neck in Early Oral Cancers: Where do we Stand Today? Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 2022; 43(01): 092-094 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1742637

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

4205

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.