Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Pilot Study to Evaluate a Temporary Skin Substitute (Spincare® Matrix) for Wound Healing in RDEB Patients (NCT NCT05944250)
NCT ID: NCT05944250
Last Updated: 2025-09-15
Results Overview
The primary endpoint was comparison of the duration of wound closure of matrix-treated wounds vs control wounds measured as the number of wounds achieving greater than 90% wound closure within 4 months
COMPLETED
NA
6 participants
Baseline to month 4 of the randomized phase
2025-09-15
Participant Flow
Patients aged 6-65 years with a clinical and/or genetic diagnosis of recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa were screened over the phone. If eligible a virtual meeting was organized, and patients were asked to review and sign the informed consent form after which the wounds were assessed to determine suitability. This target population was chosen due to their large painful wounds usually resistant to conventional treatment and would benefit most from Spincare matrix treatment.
On Day 0, the investigator conducted an in-person full body skin examination and collected wound measurements to verify eligibility. The participant's wounds were assessed for signs of infection, and target wound areas were identified. Wounds that were actively infected with pus were excluded before randomization and the application of the matrix.
Unit of analysis: wounds
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Matrix-Treated Wounds (Randomized Period)
A full body wound examination was performed by the investigator and target wound areas were marked. All eligible wound sites were randomized for matrix treatment versus standard of care wound dressings (at least 6 wounds, or 3 wound pairs). The matrix was applied to randomized treatment wounds, along with a non-adhesive bandage as a protective layer.
|
Standard of Care-Treated Wounds (Randomized Period)
A full body wound examination was performed by the investigator and target wound areas were marked. All eligible wound sites were randomized for matrix treatment versus standard of care wound dressings (at least 6 wounds, or 3 wound pairs). The matrix was applied to randomized treatment wounds, along with a non-adhesive bandage as a protective layer.
|
Open-label - Matrix Treatment
Participants from the randomized phase who were eligible and chose to participate, were enrolled at the 4 month long optional Open-Label Phase. Participant were allowed to treat previously randomized wounds (treated and control wounds) and new wounds, up to a max of 10 individuals wounds; there was no control or randomized wounds.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Randomized Period (4 Months)
STARTED
|
6 21
|
6 21
|
0 0
|
|
Randomized Period (4 Months)
COMPLETED
|
3 11
|
3 11
|
0 0
|
|
Randomized Period (4 Months)
NOT COMPLETED
|
3 10
|
3 10
|
0 0
|
|
Open Label Period (4 Months)
STARTED
|
0 0
|
0 0
|
1 5
|
|
Open Label Period (4 Months)
COMPLETED
|
0 0
|
0 0
|
1 5
|
|
Open Label Period (4 Months)
NOT COMPLETED
|
0 0
|
0 0
|
0 0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
A Pilot Study to Evaluate a Temporary Skin Substitute (Spincare® Matrix) for Wound Healing in RDEB Patients
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Matrix-Treated Wounds (Randomized Period)
n=21 wounds
Wounds that were randomized to receive matrix application.
|
Standard of Care-Treated Wounds (Randomized Period)
n=21 wounds
Wounds that were randomized to receive standard of care treatment.
|
Open Label - Matrix-Treated
n=5 wounds
Wounds that were selected to receive matrix application, no randomization, no controls.
|
Total
n=47 wounds
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
21 years
n=5 Participants
|
21 years
n=7 Participants
|
33 years
n=5 Participants
|
21 years
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
6 participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 participants
n=4 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to month 4 of the randomized phasePopulation: Participants with month 4 data
The primary endpoint was comparison of the duration of wound closure of matrix-treated wounds vs control wounds measured as the number of wounds achieving greater than 90% wound closure within 4 months
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Matrix-Treated Wounds (Randomized Period)
n=11 Wounds
Wounds that were randomized to receive matrix application.
|
Standard of Care-Treated Wounds (Randomized Period)
n=11 Wounds
Wounds that were randomized to receive standard of care treatment.
|
Matrix-Treated Wounds (Open Label Phase)
A max. of 10 wounds per participant selected for matrix application. No controls, no randomization.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Wounds With Greater Than 90% Wound Closure at 4 Months
|
0 Wounds
|
3 Wounds
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label periodComparison of application site adverse events (burning, erythema, pain) between matrix-treated wounds vs control wounds after application. For this outcome, adverse events were collected per wound; events affecting the participant but not the wound are not included.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Matrix-Treated Wounds (Randomized Period)
n=21 wounds
Wounds that were randomized to receive matrix application.
|
Standard of Care-Treated Wounds (Randomized Period)
n=21 wounds
Wounds that were randomized to receive standard of care treatment.
|
Matrix-Treated Wounds (Open Label Phase)
n=5 wounds
A max. of 10 wounds per participant selected for matrix application. No controls, no randomization.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Adverse Event Profile Characterization
Any Adverse Event
|
11 wounds
|
10 wounds
|
0 wounds
|
|
Adverse Event Profile Characterization
Pruritis, requiring medication to treat
|
2 wounds
|
0 wounds
|
0 wounds
|
|
Adverse Event Profile Characterization
Pain of Skin, requiring medication to treat
|
3 wounds
|
0 wounds
|
0 wounds
|
|
Adverse Event Profile Characterization
Bacterial Colonization
|
0 wounds
|
4 wounds
|
0 wounds
|
|
Adverse Event Profile Characterization
Skin Infection (non-serious)
|
6 wounds
|
5 wounds
|
0 wounds
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: months 1, 2, 3, and 4 of the randomized phasePopulation: Participants with available data at the respective time point
Pain was assessed using the Wong-Baker Faces scale (prior to matrix application). The scale consists of six faces that range from 0 (no pain at all, favorable outcome) to 10 (worst pain imaginable, worst outcome). Participants rated each wound using this scale, and scores were summed and averaged for each time point, resulting in an overall score range of 0 (no pain at all) to 10 (worst pain imaginable).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Matrix-Treated Wounds (Randomized Period)
n=21 wounds
Wounds that were randomized to receive matrix application.
|
Standard of Care-Treated Wounds (Randomized Period)
n=21 wounds
Wounds that were randomized to receive standard of care treatment.
|
Matrix-Treated Wounds (Open Label Phase)
A max. of 10 wounds per participant selected for matrix application. No controls, no randomization.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Wound Pain Scale Score Assessment
Baseline
|
3.143 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.38
|
2.762 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.71
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Wound Pain Scale Score Assessment
Change at Month 3
|
-1.45 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.62
|
-0.73 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.96
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Wound Pain Scale Score Assessment
Change at Month 4
|
-1.64 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.71
|
-1.64 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.8
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Wound Pain Scale Score Assessment
Change at Month 1
|
-1.43 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.18
|
-1.52 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.64
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Wound Pain Scale Score Assessment
Change at Month 2
|
0.43 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.56
|
-1.71 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.42
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: months 1, 2, 3, and 4 of the randomized phasePopulation: Participants with available data at the respective time point
Wound itch scores were assessed using the Itch NRS (prior to matrix application). The Itch NRS is a numerical rating scale from 0 to 10. Participants rated each wound using this scale, and scores were summed and averaged for each time point, resulting in an overall score of 0 to 10 (higher scores correspond to more pain).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Matrix-Treated Wounds (Randomized Period)
n=21 wounds
Wounds that were randomized to receive matrix application.
|
Standard of Care-Treated Wounds (Randomized Period)
n=21 wounds
Wounds that were randomized to receive standard of care treatment.
|
Matrix-Treated Wounds (Open Label Phase)
A max. of 10 wounds per participant selected for matrix application. No controls, no randomization.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Wound Itch Scale Score Assessment
Baseline
|
2.86 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.55
|
2.10 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.17
|
—
|
|
Change in Wound Itch Scale Score Assessment
Change at Month 1
|
-1.19 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.24
|
-0.71 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.27
|
—
|
|
Change in Wound Itch Scale Score Assessment
Change at Month 2
|
-0.85 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.75
|
-0.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.10
|
—
|
|
Change in Wound Itch Scale Score Assessment
Change at Month 3
|
-1.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.55
|
0.27 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.65
|
—
|
|
Change in Wound Itch Scale Score Assessment
Change at Month 4
|
-1.27 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.59
|
-0.18 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.73
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: months 1, 2, 3, and 4 of the randomized phasePopulation: Participants with available data at the respective time point
Comparison of wounds that reach \>50% healing from baseline in matrix vs control (standard-of-care treated) wounds, per clinician assessment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Matrix-Treated Wounds (Randomized Period)
n=21 Wounds
Wounds that were randomized to receive matrix application.
|
Standard of Care-Treated Wounds (Randomized Period)
n=21 Wounds
Wounds that were randomized to receive standard of care treatment.
|
Matrix-Treated Wounds (Open Label Phase)
A max. of 10 wounds per participant selected for matrix application. No controls, no randomization.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Wounds That Reach >50% Healing From Baseline Per Investigator Assessment
Month 2
|
4 Wounds
|
5 Wounds
|
—
|
|
Number of Wounds That Reach >50% Healing From Baseline Per Investigator Assessment
Month 3
|
4 Wounds
|
4 Wounds
|
—
|
|
Number of Wounds That Reach >50% Healing From Baseline Per Investigator Assessment
Month 4
|
1 Wounds
|
5 Wounds
|
—
|
|
Number of Wounds That Reach >50% Healing From Baseline Per Investigator Assessment
Month 1
|
8 Wounds
|
7 Wounds
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: months 1, 2, 3, and 4 of the randomized phasePopulation: Number of wounds that reach \>70% healing from baseline in matrix-treated vs control wounds
Comparison of wounds that reach \>70% healing from baseline in matrix-treated vs control wounds, per clinician assessment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Matrix-Treated Wounds (Randomized Period)
n=21 Wounds
Wounds that were randomized to receive matrix application.
|
Standard of Care-Treated Wounds (Randomized Period)
n=21 Wounds
Wounds that were randomized to receive standard of care treatment.
|
Matrix-Treated Wounds (Open Label Phase)
A max. of 10 wounds per participant selected for matrix application. No controls, no randomization.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Wounds That Reach >70% Healing From Baseline Per Investigator Assessment
Month 1
|
4 Wounds
|
5 Wounds
|
—
|
|
Number of Wounds That Reach >70% Healing From Baseline Per Investigator Assessment
Month 2
|
3 Wounds
|
4 Wounds
|
—
|
|
Number of Wounds That Reach >70% Healing From Baseline Per Investigator Assessment
Month 3
|
1 Wounds
|
3 Wounds
|
—
|
|
Number of Wounds That Reach >70% Healing From Baseline Per Investigator Assessment
Month 4
|
0 Wounds
|
4 Wounds
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Matrix-Treated Wounds (Randomized Period)
Standard of Care-Treated Wounds (Randomized Period)
Matrix-Treated Wounds (Open-Label Period)
Systemic Adverse Events (Randomized Period)
Systemic Adverse Events (Open-Label Period)
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Matrix-Treated Wounds (Randomized Period)
n=6 participants at risk
Adverse events localized to the area of the body with wounds that were randomized to receive matrix application.
|
Standard of Care-Treated Wounds (Randomized Period)
n=6 participants at risk
Adverse events localized to the area of the body with wounds that were randomized to receive standard of care treatment.
|
Matrix-Treated Wounds (Open-Label Period)
n=1 participants at risk
Adverse events localized to the area of the body with wounds that were selected to receive matrix application, no randomization, no controls.
|
Systemic Adverse Events (Randomized Period)
n=6 participants at risk
All Adverse Events, including those that affected participants as a whole (systemic events)
|
Systemic Adverse Events (Open-Label Period)
n=1 participants at risk
All Adverse Events, including those that affected participants as a whole (systemic events)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin infection
|
—
0/0 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
—
0/0 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
—
0/0 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
16.7%
1/6 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
0.00%
0/1 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Mammary Gland Carcinoma
|
—
0/0 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
—
0/0 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
—
0/0 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
16.7%
1/6 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
0.00%
0/1 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Matrix-Treated Wounds (Randomized Period)
n=6 participants at risk
Adverse events localized to the area of the body with wounds that were randomized to receive matrix application.
|
Standard of Care-Treated Wounds (Randomized Period)
n=6 participants at risk
Adverse events localized to the area of the body with wounds that were randomized to receive standard of care treatment.
|
Matrix-Treated Wounds (Open-Label Period)
n=1 participants at risk
Adverse events localized to the area of the body with wounds that were selected to receive matrix application, no randomization, no controls.
|
Systemic Adverse Events (Randomized Period)
n=6 participants at risk
All Adverse Events, including those that affected participants as a whole (systemic events)
|
Systemic Adverse Events (Open-Label Period)
n=1 participants at risk
All Adverse Events, including those that affected participants as a whole (systemic events)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
General disorders
Fever
|
—
0/0 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
—
0/0 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
—
0/0 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
16.7%
1/6 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
0.00%
0/1 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
|
Infections and infestations
Flu-like symptoms
|
—
0/0 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
—
0/0 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
—
0/0 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
50.0%
3/6 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
0.00%
0/1 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
|
Infections and infestations
Lymph node infection
|
—
0/0 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
—
0/0 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
—
0/0 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
16.7%
1/6 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
0.00%
0/1 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache, migraine
|
—
0/0 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
—
0/0 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
—
0/0 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
100.0%
1/1 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritis, requiring treatment
|
16.7%
1/6 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
0.00%
0/1 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
16.7%
1/6 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
0.00%
0/1 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pain of skin, requiring treatment
|
16.7%
1/6 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
0.00%
0/1 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
16.7%
1/6 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
0.00%
0/1 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bacterial colonization
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
33.3%
2/6 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
0.00%
0/1 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
33.3%
2/6 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
0.00%
0/1 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
|
Infections and infestations
Skin Infection
|
16.7%
1/6 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
33.3%
2/6 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
0.00%
0/1 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
50.0%
3/6 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
0.00%
0/1 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Toothache, chipped tooth
|
—
0/0 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
—
0/0 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
—
0/0 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
16.7%
1/6 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
0.00%
0/1 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
|
Immune system disorders
Allergic reaction, seasonal allergies
|
—
0/0 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
—
0/0 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
—
0/0 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
16.7%
1/6 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
0.00%
0/1 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
—
0/0 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
—
0/0 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
—
0/0 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
33.3%
2/6 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
0.00%
0/1 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
—
0/0 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
—
0/0 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
—
0/0 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
16.7%
1/6 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
0.00%
0/1 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Premature menopause
|
—
0/0 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
—
0/0 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
—
0/0 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
16.7%
1/6 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
0.00%
0/1 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Vaginal discharge
|
—
0/0 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
—
0/0 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
—
0/0 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
16.7%
1/6 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
0.00%
0/1 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Bullous dermatitis
|
—
0/0 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
—
0/0 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
—
0/0 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
16.7%
1/6 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
0.00%
0/1 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
|
Eye disorders
Vision decreased, hyperopia
|
—
0/0 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
—
0/0 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
—
0/0 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
16.7%
1/6 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
0.00%
0/1 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dental caries
|
—
0/0 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
—
0/0 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
—
0/0 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
16.7%
1/6 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
0.00%
0/1 • 4-month randomized period followed by 4-month open-label period
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place