A Real-world, Head-to-head Comparison of Dupilumab Versus Mepolizumab in Danish Patients With Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps
NCT ID: NCT05942222
Last Updated: 2025-07-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
PHASE4
220 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-04-27
2026-05-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The main questions it aims to answer are whether the two drugs are comparable in effect after 24 weeks in terms of:
* A subjective score (the SNOT-22)
* An objective score, i.e.the physician-assessed score of nasal polyp size (the Nasal Polyp Score (0-8))
Methods:
Participants will be randomized to receive one of the IMPs drug in the standard dose. After 24 weeks the effect is assessed by subjective and objective measures. If the criteria set by the Danish Medicinal Council are met (see elsewhere), treatment continues with the same drug for an additional 24 weeks. If the effect criteria are not met, the subject crosses-over to the opposite drug for an additional 24 weeks. After 48 weeks the effect is assessed once more.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Controlled Clinical Study of Dupilumab in Patients With Nasal Polyps
NCT02898454
Mepolizumab Effectiveness in Patients With Chronic Rhinosinusitis, Nasal Polyps and Comorbid Severe Eosinophilic Asthma
NCT06069310
EValuating trEatment RESponses of Dupilumab Versus Omalizumab in Type 2 Patients
NCT04998604
Comparison of Immune Profiles in Chronic Rhinosinusitis Patients After Mepolizumab Treatment
NCT05642806
Complete Remission After Treatment With Biologics for Nasal Polyps
NCT07268313
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* The primary objective is to
1. establish non-inferiority of dupilumab versus mepolizumab, and if that is established, then
2. test for possible superiority of dupilumab over mepolizumab in the following hierarchical order (SNOT-22 - Sniffin' Sticks 16 - NPS - ACQ
* The secondary objective is to explore any other relevant differences between mepolizumab and dupilumab in terms of frequency of AEs, need for rescue treatments, diversity in outcome based on endotype or comorbidity or other factors, that can lead to a patient-centred approach, when choosing treatment for CRSwNP.
Trial design:
A randomized, multi-center non-inferiority trial (phase IV RCT). The trial is unblinded.
Investigational medicinal products (IMPs) will be "off-the-shelf" and administered in EMA-approved dosages and -intervals.
Trial population:
The trial aims to include 220 patients with severe, uncontrolled CRSwNP (110 patients in each treatment group). The patients will be recruited from 9 different sites across Denmark. Treatment in Denmark is 100% subsidized by the state.
Methods:
Subjects fulfilling inclusion criteria will be randomized 1:1 to either dupilumab or mepolizumab. After 24 weeks a halfway evaluation will decide if subjects are to stay in their current treatment arm, or cross-over to the opposite arm.
By including 220 participants (effectively 176 participants after 20% drop-outs) the study will achieve a power of \>95% to show non-inferiority of dupilumab to mepolizumab for both co-primary endpoints with the following criteria: Level of significance for both endpoints of a one-sided test, p\<0.025 and including previously found standard deviation (SD) values 1.9 for NPS and 22 for SNOT-22, an expected superior effect of 0.7 for NPS and 7 on SNOT-22, a minimal clinically relevant difference (MCID) of 1 for NPS and 12 for SNOT-22, respectively.
Trial medication:
All trial medication will be "off the shelf" i.e. no special labelling. It will be provided by hospital pharmacies in accordance with GMP. The investigational medicinal products (IMPs) are dupilumab (Dupixent, Sanofi) and mepolizumab (Nucala, GSK). Dupilumab are administered as subcutaneous injections of 300 mg every two weeks in the first 24 weeks. If the DMC response criteria (table 2) are met after 24 weeks, the dosing interval will be increased to every four weeks, in accordance with previous research and DMC recommendations. Mepolizumab is administered subcutaneously as 100 mg sc. every four weeks. Patients will continue standard of care treatment of INCS and saline irrigation, unless contraindicated.
If rescue treatment is needed, a course of oral corticosteroids (Prednisolone) 37.5 mg once daily for 7 days will be given.
Trial schedule:
Planned first subject first visit May 2023
Planned last subject randomized February 2025
Planned last subject last visit:March 2026
End of trial March 2026
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Dupilumab week 0-24 300 mg/2 weeks
Normal dose and interval of Dupixent i.e. 300 mg s.c. every 2 weeks
dupilumab
Subcutaneus injections in standard doses, i.e. 300 mg s.c. every 2 weeks.
Mepolizumab week 0-24 100 mg/4 weeks
Normal dose and interval of Nucala i.e. 100 mg s.c. every 4 weeks
mepolizumab
Subcutaneus injections in standard doses, i.e. 100 mg s.c. every 4 weeks.
Dupilumab week 24-48 300 mg/4 weeks
Increased dosage interval of Dupixent i.e. 300 mg s.c. every 4 weeks - for subjects on Dupixent who met the 24 weeks effect criteria
dupilumab
Subcutaneus injections in standard doses, i.e. 300 mg s.c. every 2 weeks.
Dupilumab week 24-48 300 mg/2 weeks
Normal dose and interval of Dupixent i.e. 300 mg s.c. every 2 weeks but for subjects who have crossed over after 24 weeks due to unmet effect criteria.
dupilumab
Subcutaneus injections in standard doses, i.e. 300 mg s.c. every 2 weeks.
Mepolizumab week 24-48 100 mg/4 weeks
Normal dose and interval of Nucala i.e. 100 mg s.c. every 4 weeks but for subjects who have crossed-over after 24 weeks due to unmet effect criteria.
mepolizumab
Subcutaneus injections in standard doses, i.e. 100 mg s.c. every 4 weeks.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
dupilumab
Subcutaneus injections in standard doses, i.e. 300 mg s.c. every 2 weeks.
mepolizumab
Subcutaneus injections in standard doses, i.e. 100 mg s.c. every 4 weeks.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* ESS within the last three years (unless unfit for surgery y- in this study defined as either a severe somatic disease, for which other specialist advise against surgery, e.g., cardiac disease, pulmonary disease, or coagulation disorder OR/AND severe anxiety which can either be due to previous traumatic experiences with surgery or the postoperative period, post-traumatic stress disorder or severe anxiety disorder. In cases of doubt, investigators can ask for a written statement from the general practitioner or a psychiatrists/psychologist))
* Optimal local treatment with saline irrigation and topical nasal steroids for at least three months (unless contraindicated)
* Evidence of type 2 inflammation
Furthermore, patients must fulfil three out the following five criteria:
* Need for systemic corticosteroids (at least two courses/year OR long-term treatment \>3 months) or contraindication to systemic steroids
* Significantly impaired QoL (SNOT-22 score≥50)
* Significant LoS (SSIT-16 score 0-8)
* NPS ≥5 (with at least 2 on either side)
* Asthma diagnosis (requiring inhaled corticosteroid (ICS))
Also: Age of 18 years or more and able to read and/or speak Danish
Exclusion Criteria
* Endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) within the last six months
* Non-adherent to medicine regimens
* Hypersensitivity to the active substance or any of the excipients in the two IMPs
* Not able to understand spoken and/or written Danish
* Participation-current or previous (within the last year)-in another investigational drug trial with monoclonal antibodies for asthma, CRSwNP, atopic dermatitis or allergic rhinitis.
* Previous treatment failure with one of the IMPs for any indication (treatment failure is defined as failure to achieve the desired therapeutic outcome or effectively manage a condition within an expected timeframe)
* Eosinophilic blood cell count of ≥1.5x10\^9cells/L (at baseline, i.e. before first injection)
* Pronounced fear of needles
* Pregnant or breastfeeding patients
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Christian Korsgaard Pedersen
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Christian Pedersen, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Department of ORL, Head and Neck Surgery & Audiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
Christian von Buchwald
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Department of ORL, Head and Neck Surgery & Audiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Aalborg Universitetssygehus Syd
Aalborg, , Denmark
Aarhus Universitetshospital Skejby
Aarhus, , Denmark
Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen, , Denmark
Sydvestjysk Sygehus Esbjerg
Esbjerg, , Denmark
Regionshospitalet Gødstrup
Herning, , Denmark
Nordsjællands Hospital
Hillerød, , Denmark
Sjællands Universitetshospital Køge
Køge, , Denmark
Odense Universitetshospital
Odense, , Denmark
Sygehus Lillebælt Vejle
Vejle, , Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2022-ENT-3
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.