A Real-world, Head-to-head Comparison of Dupilumab Versus Mepolizumab in Danish Patients With Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps

NCT ID: NCT05942222

Last Updated: 2025-07-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

220 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-04-27

Study Completion Date

2026-05-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to compare the effects of two newly available biological drugs for the treatment of severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in Danish patients.

The main questions it aims to answer are whether the two drugs are comparable in effect after 24 weeks in terms of:

* A subjective score (the SNOT-22)
* An objective score, i.e.the physician-assessed score of nasal polyp size (the Nasal Polyp Score (0-8))

Methods:

Participants will be randomized to receive one of the IMPs drug in the standard dose. After 24 weeks the effect is assessed by subjective and objective measures. If the criteria set by the Danish Medicinal Council are met (see elsewhere), treatment continues with the same drug for an additional 24 weeks. If the effect criteria are not met, the subject crosses-over to the opposite drug for an additional 24 weeks. After 48 weeks the effect is assessed once more.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Objectives:

* The primary objective is to

1. establish non-inferiority of dupilumab versus mepolizumab, and if that is established, then
2. test for possible superiority of dupilumab over mepolizumab in the following hierarchical order (SNOT-22 - Sniffin' Sticks 16 - NPS - ACQ
* The secondary objective is to explore any other relevant differences between mepolizumab and dupilumab in terms of frequency of AEs, need for rescue treatments, diversity in outcome based on endotype or comorbidity or other factors, that can lead to a patient-centred approach, when choosing treatment for CRSwNP.

Trial design:

A randomized, multi-center non-inferiority trial (phase IV RCT). The trial is unblinded.

Investigational medicinal products (IMPs) will be "off-the-shelf" and administered in EMA-approved dosages and -intervals.

Trial population:

The trial aims to include 220 patients with severe, uncontrolled CRSwNP (110 patients in each treatment group). The patients will be recruited from 9 different sites across Denmark. Treatment in Denmark is 100% subsidized by the state.

Methods:

Subjects fulfilling inclusion criteria will be randomized 1:1 to either dupilumab or mepolizumab. After 24 weeks a halfway evaluation will decide if subjects are to stay in their current treatment arm, or cross-over to the opposite arm.

By including 220 participants (effectively 176 participants after 20% drop-outs) the study will achieve a power of \>95% to show non-inferiority of dupilumab to mepolizumab for both co-primary endpoints with the following criteria: Level of significance for both endpoints of a one-sided test, p\<0.025 and including previously found standard deviation (SD) values 1.9 for NPS and 22 for SNOT-22, an expected superior effect of 0.7 for NPS and 7 on SNOT-22, a minimal clinically relevant difference (MCID) of 1 for NPS and 12 for SNOT-22, respectively.

Trial medication:

All trial medication will be "off the shelf" i.e. no special labelling. It will be provided by hospital pharmacies in accordance with GMP. The investigational medicinal products (IMPs) are dupilumab (Dupixent, Sanofi) and mepolizumab (Nucala, GSK). Dupilumab are administered as subcutaneous injections of 300 mg every two weeks in the first 24 weeks. If the DMC response criteria (table 2) are met after 24 weeks, the dosing interval will be increased to every four weeks, in accordance with previous research and DMC recommendations. Mepolizumab is administered subcutaneously as 100 mg sc. every four weeks. Patients will continue standard of care treatment of INCS and saline irrigation, unless contraindicated.

If rescue treatment is needed, a course of oral corticosteroids (Prednisolone) 37.5 mg once daily for 7 days will be given.

Trial schedule:

Planned first subject first visit May 2023

Planned last subject randomized February 2025

Planned last subject last visit:March 2026

End of trial March 2026

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps Asthma; Eosinophilic Eosinophilia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Dupilumab week 0-24 300 mg/2 weeks

Normal dose and interval of Dupixent i.e. 300 mg s.c. every 2 weeks

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

dupilumab

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Subcutaneus injections in standard doses, i.e. 300 mg s.c. every 2 weeks.

Mepolizumab week 0-24 100 mg/4 weeks

Normal dose and interval of Nucala i.e. 100 mg s.c. every 4 weeks

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

mepolizumab

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Subcutaneus injections in standard doses, i.e. 100 mg s.c. every 4 weeks.

Dupilumab week 24-48 300 mg/4 weeks

Increased dosage interval of Dupixent i.e. 300 mg s.c. every 4 weeks - for subjects on Dupixent who met the 24 weeks effect criteria

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

dupilumab

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Subcutaneus injections in standard doses, i.e. 300 mg s.c. every 2 weeks.

Dupilumab week 24-48 300 mg/2 weeks

Normal dose and interval of Dupixent i.e. 300 mg s.c. every 2 weeks but for subjects who have crossed over after 24 weeks due to unmet effect criteria.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

dupilumab

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Subcutaneus injections in standard doses, i.e. 300 mg s.c. every 2 weeks.

Mepolizumab week 24-48 100 mg/4 weeks

Normal dose and interval of Nucala i.e. 100 mg s.c. every 4 weeks but for subjects who have crossed-over after 24 weeks due to unmet effect criteria.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

mepolizumab

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Subcutaneus injections in standard doses, i.e. 100 mg s.c. every 4 weeks.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

dupilumab

Subcutaneus injections in standard doses, i.e. 300 mg s.c. every 2 weeks.

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

mepolizumab

Subcutaneus injections in standard doses, i.e. 100 mg s.c. every 4 weeks.

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Dupixent Nucala

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Bilateral polyps in nose and sinuses
* ESS within the last three years (unless unfit for surgery y- in this study defined as either a severe somatic disease, for which other specialist advise against surgery, e.g., cardiac disease, pulmonary disease, or coagulation disorder OR/AND severe anxiety which can either be due to previous traumatic experiences with surgery or the postoperative period, post-traumatic stress disorder or severe anxiety disorder. In cases of doubt, investigators can ask for a written statement from the general practitioner or a psychiatrists/psychologist))
* Optimal local treatment with saline irrigation and topical nasal steroids for at least three months (unless contraindicated)
* Evidence of type 2 inflammation

Furthermore, patients must fulfil three out the following five criteria:

* Need for systemic corticosteroids (at least two courses/year OR long-term treatment \>3 months) or contraindication to systemic steroids
* Significantly impaired QoL (SNOT-22 score≥50)
* Significant LoS (SSIT-16 score 0-8)
* NPS ≥5 (with at least 2 on either side)
* Asthma diagnosis (requiring inhaled corticosteroid (ICS))

Also: Age of 18 years or more and able to read and/or speak Danish

Exclusion Criteria

* Systemic corticosteroid treatment within the last three months
* Endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) within the last six months
* Non-adherent to medicine regimens
* Hypersensitivity to the active substance or any of the excipients in the two IMPs
* Not able to understand spoken and/or written Danish
* Participation-current or previous (within the last year)-in another investigational drug trial with monoclonal antibodies for asthma, CRSwNP, atopic dermatitis or allergic rhinitis.
* Previous treatment failure with one of the IMPs for any indication (treatment failure is defined as failure to achieve the desired therapeutic outcome or effectively manage a condition within an expected timeframe)
* Eosinophilic blood cell count of ≥1.5x10\^9cells/L (at baseline, i.e. before first injection)
* Pronounced fear of needles
* Pregnant or breastfeeding patients
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Rigshospitalet, Denmark

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Christian Korsgaard Pedersen

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Christian Pedersen, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of ORL, Head and Neck Surgery & Audiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark

Christian von Buchwald

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Department of ORL, Head and Neck Surgery & Audiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Aalborg Universitetssygehus Syd

Aalborg, , Denmark

Site Status

Aarhus Universitetshospital Skejby

Aarhus, , Denmark

Site Status

Rigshospitalet

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status

Sydvestjysk Sygehus Esbjerg

Esbjerg, , Denmark

Site Status

Regionshospitalet Gødstrup

Herning, , Denmark

Site Status

Nordsjællands Hospital

Hillerød, , Denmark

Site Status

Sjællands Universitetshospital Køge

Køge, , Denmark

Site Status

Odense Universitetshospital

Odense, , Denmark

Site Status

Sygehus Lillebælt Vejle

Vejle, , Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2022-ENT-3

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Mepolizumab in Nasal Polyposis
NCT01362244 COMPLETED PHASE2
th2 Modulation CRSwNP
NCT06107101 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE4
Dupixent Study for Alternate Administration
NCT06750471 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE4
Dupilumab in CRSsNP
NCT04678856 COMPLETED PHASE3