A Prospective Observational Study on the Role of Transthoracic Ultrasound in Differentiating Tuberculous From Malignant Pleural Effusion

NCT ID: NCT05935696

Last Updated: 2023-07-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-04-01

Study Completion Date

2024-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Primary Endpoint

* To assess the prevalence and diagnostic performance of pre-determined echographic features in predicting the diagnosis of TBE from MPE.
* To determine the clinical, pleural fluid and echographic parameters that were different among TBE and MPE and to establish a clinical prediction model for TBE.

Secondary Endpoint

* To assess the correlation between pleural fluid parameters with ultrasound and medical thoracoscopic finding.
* To assess the optimal Pf ADA cut-off value to differentiate TBE from MPE in our region.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Tuberculous (TBE) and malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is the commonest cause of exudative pleural effusion in Malaysia. Early differentiation between these two diagnoses is essential as TBE only requires drainage if symptomatic, whereas MPE would require tissue biopsy for diagnosis confirmation and molecular profiling. However, both TBE and MPE present almost similarly with lymphocytic exudates. Pleural fluid (Pf) indices such as adenosine deaminase (ADA) may allow differentiation between these two entities in appropriate clinical circumstances. However, Pf ADA may not readily be accessible in resource-limited regions and the optimal cut-off varies depending on the local prevalence of tuberculosis. As a result, TBE diagnosis in our region is still heavily dependent on the analysis of pre-existing clinical demographic data and Pf parameters, where ultimately requiring pleural biopsy for a confident clinical diagnosis.

Point-of-care predictors for TBE, such as ultrasound imaging appearance, may be helpful, but have rarely been described. Previous studies have demonstrated that a complex septated ultrasound pattern in lymphocytic pleural effusion is a potentially useful diagnostic predictor to differentiate TBE from MPE with a positive predictive value of 94% and likelihood ratio of 12.2 TBE diagnostic algorithms frequently include only clinical indices with Pf parameters such as Pf differential cell count, ADA, protein and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). Incorporation of point-of-care ultrasound finding into the clinical diagnostic algorithm has not been extensively explored.

TBE is the result of a delayed type IV hypersensitivity reaction to mycobacterial protein; fibrin formation in the pleural cavity is largely driven by pro-inflammatory cytokines as well as a reduction of fibrinolytic activity due to pleural inflammation. In contrast, MPE is believed to be driven by a high degree of anaerobic metabolism leading to lactic acid production, rather than an inflammatory response. These different pathogenic mechanisms in TBE and MPE resulted in different pleural fluid parameters such as lower Pf glucose and pH with higher Pf LDH level in MPE when compared to TBE. We believed that this principle may be extrapolated to discriminative ultrasound findings between TBE and MPE.

The result from our retrospective pilot study found that the presence of echographic septation had an adjusted odds ratio of 9.28 in prediction of TBE diagnosis from MPE. Along with other clinical parameters (male gender, serum leucocyte counts 9 x 109/L or, pleural fluid protein 50g/L or more), these parameters collectively report a diagnostic accuracy of 79.61% (95% CI 74.13-84.38) for TBE. In a previous study conducted in region with low tuberculosis burden, pleural thickening of \>1cm, pleural nodularity and diaphragmatic thickening of \>7mm on transthoracic ultrasound were highly suggestive of MPE. However, not uncommonly, we observed similar pattern of pleural and diaphragmatic thickening in TBE patients in our region as well.

As TBE is a hypersensitivity process with significant inflammatory response, we hypothesize that echographic septation, in addition to pleural thickening and other sonographic findings, may be a good indicator, as part of a clinical prediction model to discriminate TBE from MPE in our region.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pleural Effusion Tuberculosis, Pleural Malignant Pleural Effusion

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Tuberculous Pleural Effusion

Tuberculous pleural effusion (TBE)

if any of the following criteria is presence:

* Histological evidence of caseating granuloma from pleural biopsy
* Microbiological evidence (positive growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis culture, positive TB-PCR, positive Xpert MTB/RIF) from pleural fluid or pleural biopsy specimen
* In patients with positive sputum smear for acid fast bacilli, sputum positive for mycobacterium tuberculosis culture, sputum positive for Xpert MTB/RIF or TB-PCR with no apparent cause of an exudative pleural effusion

Patient without histological or microbiological evidence who demonstrated therapeutic response to anti-tuberculosis drugs will not be accepted as TBE in current study.

No interventions assigned to this group

Malignant Pleural Effusion (Control)

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE)

if any of the following criteria is presence:

• Histological or cytological evidence of specific histopathological diagnosis of malignancy from pleural biopsy Patient without histological or cytological evidence or malignancy (para-malignant) will not be considered as MPE in the context of this study.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All adult patients 18 years old or more
* Undiagnosed exudative pleural effusion planning for diagnostic medical thoracoscopy

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient less than 18 years old
* Patient for therapeutic medical thoracoscope (i.e., medical thoracoscopic adhesiolysis in patient with parapneumonic pleural effusion) in which diagnosis is already known.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hospital Queen Elizabeth, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Institute of Respiratory Medicine Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hospital Serdang, Selangor

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Malaya

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hospital Melaka, Melaka

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Sarawak General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Kho Sze Shyang

Dr.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Sarawak General Hospital

Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Malaysia

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Sze Shyang Kho, MD

Role: primary

6082276666

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TUS-TBE v4.0

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.