Post-Brain Injury Walking and Balance Recovery Program

NCT ID: NCT05934773

Last Updated: 2025-12-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

5 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-08-18

Study Completion Date

2025-04-04

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to test the efficacy of a walking and balance training program designed to safely challenge and improve walking performance and balance in relation to walking speed, strength, endurance, and balance after traumatic brain injury (TBI).

The aim and primary hypothesis of this research project is:

Aim) Test and implement a new personalized intervention strategy, in addition to usual and customary care at an inpatient rehabilitation clinic, to improve patient outcomes with secondary conditions associated with impaired balance and walking that typically occur post brain injury. After validation of the locomotor Battery of tests, we will implement a personalized training strategy for individuals based on their battery profile.

Hypothesis) Individuals training with this individualized protocol will demonstrate improved walking and balance outcomes and those with lesser pre-intervention impairment will improve at a greater rate than those with greater pre-intervention impairment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Traumatic brain injury, due to trauma and/or neurologic disease, is a leading cause of long-term disability in the United States . Balance impairments observed within the post-TBI population can greatly impact walking abilities and pose a variety of challenges (1, 2). Ochi et al (2) reported that survivors of a TBI may have a gait characterized by an asymmetrical pattern with a prolonged stance phase and a shorter step length for the less-affected limb. Such impairments can interfere with a person's ability to walk and may create dependency on a caregiver or an assistive device. Following hospital discharge, there is a greater fall risk as well as a decrease in physical activity and an increase in sedentary behaviors that lead to deconditioning . Improving a person's ability to walk is often one of the most important parts of their rehabilitation program after a TBI. The importance of repetitive, task-based walking practice to get people to a point where they can walk normally has been recognized and built into the rehabilitation setting. Schmidt and Lee say that motor learning shows a neural specificity of practice because it involves the integration of sensory and motor information, which happens during practice and leads to the sensorimotor solution that leads to accurate, consistent, and skilled movements. It has been shown that rehabilitation based on the ideas of repetitive, intensive, task-oriented training works (2).

Clinicians use their bodies to lift, move, and provide "safety nets" for patients who may be up to three times larger than they are. The intensity and duration of physical therapy sessions are often limited due to the exhaustion of the clinician. Safety concerns sometimes limit the extent to which the clinician is able to challenge the patient as much as possible to enhance learning, because falls and other injuries are not desirable. Robots are tireless, precise devices that can do repetitive motion. In these rather early days in the development of human-machine interactions, there are many unrealized functions that robotic technology can do for rehabilitation (3). The device, the KineAssist MX (https://www.woodway.com/products/kineassist/ ) can facilitate, rather than replace, the efforts of a therapist. This collaborative approach in rehabilitation robotic design was utilized by starting with the end user (clinician) and implementing the feedback received to create a device that assists with functional mobility in stroke rehabilitation. Improvement of walking and balance outcomes in gait-impaired population requires the re-evaluation of current approaches and the testing/implementation of new approaches.

This study will involve the use of a robotic treadmill device to ameliorate physical therapy gait rehabilitation sessions for people with TBI condition and compare their walking abilities before and after our training protocol. In this study, we will be evaluating our novel gait training protocol efficacy for improving TBI individuals walking regarding their endurance, balance, and strength. If it is found that walking performance improves significantly for TBI individuals who are trained by this device, particularly for people with the greatest walking and balance impairment, clinicians and physical therapists can consider implementing this protocol for the TBI population's walking and balance rehabilitation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acquired Brain Injury Stroke Traumatic Brain Injury

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Gait Rehabilitation Robotic Treadmill

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Gait Rehabilitation

12-16 gait rehabilitation sessions on a robotic treadmill, emphasizing gait scaffolds: endurance, strength, speed, and balance. 3-4 sessions of training for each.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

KineAssist robotic treadmill

Intervention Type DEVICE

A formal standardization procedure will be used. Prior to testing, the participant's weight, height, age, blood pressure, and resting heart rate will be recorded. Each session will take place over a 1 hour period. All of our participants will have 1 evaluation sessions prior to the training sessions (overground) and 1 evaluation sessions at the end of the training sessions (overground).

Each participant will have the training sessions up to 3 times each week. The total number of training sessions would be 12-16 sessions (based on duration of stay) of robotic treadmill training for, distributed equally over each specific training modality (Endurance x 4, Strength x 4, Speed x 4, and Dynamic Balance x 4).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

KineAssist robotic treadmill

A formal standardization procedure will be used. Prior to testing, the participant's weight, height, age, blood pressure, and resting heart rate will be recorded. Each session will take place over a 1 hour period. All of our participants will have 1 evaluation sessions prior to the training sessions (overground) and 1 evaluation sessions at the end of the training sessions (overground).

Each participant will have the training sessions up to 3 times each week. The total number of training sessions would be 12-16 sessions (based on duration of stay) of robotic treadmill training for, distributed equally over each specific training modality (Endurance x 4, Strength x 4, Speed x 4, and Dynamic Balance x 4).

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adults ages 18 years and older
* All demographic groups will be invited to participate and would have equal access
* Post-TBI individuals currently enrolled at the Moody Neurorehabilitation Institute
* Ambulatory with or without assistive devices
* Subjects with expressive aphasia in the case of a caregiver able to provide assistance when needed
* English-speaking or have a certified interpreter that is English-speaking who will be present for interpretation during the study
* Medically stable (controlled hypertension, no arrhythmia, stable cardiovascular status)
* Able to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Subjects with loss of lower limb
* History of serious cardiac disease (e.g., myocardial infarction)
* Uncontrolled blood pressure (systolic pressure \>140 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure \>90 mmHg)
* Subjects with receptive aphasia
* Presence of cerebellar and brainstem deficits
* Severe cognitive disorder
* Uncontrolled respiratory or metabolic disorders
* Major or acute musculoskeletal problems
* Spasticity management that included phenol block injections within 12 months or botulinum toxin injections within 4 months of the study
* Body weight greater than 250 pounds (due to robotic device weight restrictions)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The Moody Foundation

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Moody Neurorehabilitation Institute

Galveston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Zhou XR, Fan LH, Yang XP. [Assessment of dynamic posture equilibrium function after traumatic brain injury]. Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2010 Dec;26(6):428-31. Chinese.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21425604 (View on PubMed)

Ochi F, Esquenazi A, Hirai B, Talaty M. Temporal-spatial feature of gait after traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1999 Apr;14(2):105-15. doi: 10.1097/00001199-199904000-00002.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10191370 (View on PubMed)

Esquenazi A, Lee S, Wikoff A, Packel A, Toczylowski T, Feeley J. A Comparison of Locomotor Therapy Interventions: Partial-Body Weight-Supported Treadmill, Lokomat, and G-EO Training in People With Traumatic Brain Injury. PM R. 2017 Sep;9(9):839-846. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2016.12.010. Epub 2017 Jan 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28093370 (View on PubMed)

Wang J, Hurt CP, Capo-Lugo CE, Brown DA. Characteristics of horizontal force generation for individuals post-stroke walking against progressive resistive forces. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2015 Jan;30(1):40-5. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2014.11.006. Epub 2014 Nov 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25481856 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

22-0162

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id