Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
100 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-07-10
2024-02-29
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Belt Squat Training for Non-Specific Low Back Pain
NCT06594731
Prognostic Factors of Importance on Who Develops Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT03940456
Are Acceptance and Commitment Related to Treatment Response in Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT02426970
The Spinopelvic Parameters, Body Mass Index and Waist Circumference in Patientd Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain
NCT05771493
Mind-body Treatments for Chronic Back Pain
NCT03294148
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The following methodology will be applied as for the development of the Work In Progress questionnaire (WIP), a tool designed to evaluate commitment in persons, and its psychometric validation:
1. item generation and selection: the first defines the content of an index and ensures the most important topics are well-thought-out. The second eliminates redundant items, and decreases the number to a total that is feasible to administer while ensuring the scale measures the construct of interest.
2. psychometric analysis: exploratory factor analysis (Cattel Scree Test, Varimax Rotation), reliability (internal consistency by Cronbach's alpha, test-retest reliability by Intraclass Correlation Coefficient 2.1), Measurement error (calculated by multiplying the standard error of measurement (SEM) by the z-score associated with the desired level of confidence (95%, in our case) and the square root of 2), and construct validity by hypothesis testing the correlations (Pearson r) with related measures (Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Oswestry Disability Scale, Numerical pain Rating Scale).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
This is a non-interventional study
None (this is a non-interventional study)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* adult age
* reading/speaking Italian.
Exclusion Criteria
* refusal to adhere.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
International Institute of Behavioral Medicines
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Barbara Rocca
Dr
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Barbara Rocca
Calosso, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Barbara Rocca
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Guyatt GH, Bombardier C, Tugwell PX. Measuring disease-specific quality of life in clinical trials. CMAJ. 1986 Apr 15;134(8):889-95.
Collins D. Pretesting survey instruments: an overview of cognitive methods. Qual Life Res. 2003 May;12(3):229-38. doi: 10.1023/a:1023254226592.
de Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, et al. Measurement in medicine. A practical guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011
Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;60(1):34-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012. Epub 2006 Aug 24.
Chiarotto A, Koes BW. Nonspecific Low Back Pain. N Engl J Med. 2022 May 5;386(18):1732-1740. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp2032396. No abstract available.
Hayes SC. Get out of your mind and into your life: The new acceptance and commitment therapy. New Harbinger Publications; 2005 Nov 1.
Sullivan MJ, Bishop SR, & Pivik J. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Development and validation. Psychol Assess 1995;7:524-532
Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O'Brien JP. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy. 1980 Aug;66(8):271-3. No abstract available.
Salaffi F, Stancati A, Silvestri CA, Ciapetti A, Grassi W. Minimal clinically important changes in chronic musculoskeletal pain intensity measured on a numerical rating scale. Eur J Pain. 2004 Aug;8(4):283-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2003.09.004.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2023-001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.