Carotid Doppler Peak Velocity Variation in Liposuction Fluid Management

NCT ID: NCT05930106

Last Updated: 2025-04-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-11-20

Study Completion Date

2024-12-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aims to compare the hemodynamic parameters, postoperative plethysmography variability index, the total amount of postoperative intravenous fluid administration needed, and the urine output of two methods of fluid resuscitation during liposuction surgery. One method involves using carotid artery Doppler peak velocity variation, while the other is the conventional fluid ratio.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The research will involve 50 female participants who have undergone liposuction and will be divided into two groups.

Group 1: Fluid administration will be determined by the intraoperative fluid ratio. This ratio is calculated by dividing the sum of subcutaneous infiltration and intravenous fluid by the total aspirate volume. Depending on the aspiration volume, it will be maintained at 1-1.4.

Group 2: Participants will be given a fluid maintenance rate of 1.5 ml/kg/h. To determine fluid responsiveness, the carotid artery peak velocity variation (ΔVPeak-CA) will be measured before, during, and after the procedure. If the ΔVPeak-CA goes above 15%, the patient will receive a fluid bolus of lactated ringer solution at a rate of 4-6 ml/kg over 10-15 minutes, and the team will re-measure fluid responsiveness 10 minutes after each ΔVPeaK-CA.

During the examination, a single cardiothoracic anesthesiologist will use a 13-6 MHz linear probe (Fujifilm Sonosite M-Turbo) to measure the peak velocity of the carotid artery on the left side. The sample volume will be positioned at the center of the lumen, 2 cm from the bulb, and a pulsed wave Doppler examination will be conducted.

To measure the ΔVPeak-CA, the investigators will calculate the maximum and minimum values during one respiratory cycle. This will be done by using the formula: 100x (maximum peak velocity - minimum peak velocity) / \[(maximum peak velocity + minimum peak velocity)/2\].

Surgical technique

The superwet tumescence technique will be the only method utilized for infiltration during the procedure. All participants will undergo power-assisted liposuction, and a single surgeon will operate. The wetting solution will contain 1000cc of normal saline and 2mg of epinephrine in a 1:500,000 ratio. The total Infiltration volume will depend on the patient.

The total amount of aspiration will depend on the patient and surgery plan and can vary between 2500 to 5000 ml

During the surgical procedure, the investigators will monitor vital signs such as blood pressure, heart rate, temperature, oxygen levels, and urine output. Additionally, the investigators will track the amount of fluids given and removed, and the volume of blood aspirated.

Following surgery, participants will be hospitalized for 24 hours. During this time, the investigators will closely monitor the plethysmography variability index (PVI) in both groups. If the PVI exceeds 15%, participants will receive a ringer lactate fluid bolus of 4-6 ml/kg. Additionally, the investigators will keep track of their urine output, total fluid intake, and vital signs

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lipodystrophy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

The research will involve 50 female patients who have undergone liposuction and will be divided into two groups.

Group Intraoperative Fluid Ratio: Fluid administration will be determined by the intraoperative fluid ratio. This ratio is calculated by dividing the sum of subcutaneous infiltration and intravenous fluid by the total aspirate volume. Depending on the aspiration volume, it will be maintained at 1-1.4.

Group Carotid Artery Peak Velocity Variation: Patients will be given a fluid maintenance rate of 1.5 ml/kg/h. To determine fluid responsiveness, the carotid artery peak velocity variation (ΔVPeak-CA) will be measured before, during, and after the procedure. If the ΔVPeak-CA goes above 15%, the patient will receive a fluid bolus of lactated ringer solution at a rate of 4-6 ml/kg over 10-15 minutes, and the team will re-measure fluid responsiveness 10 minutes after each ΔVPeaK-CA.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group Intraoperative fluid ratio

The intraoperative fluid ratio will determine fluid administration. This ratio is calculated by dividing the sum of subcutaneous infiltration and intravenous fluid by the total aspirate volume. Depending on the aspiration volume, it will be maintained at 1-1.4.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Intraoperative fluid ratio

Intervention Type OTHER

This ratio is calculated by dividing the sum of procedure subcutaneous infiltration and intravenous fluid by the total aspirate volume during surgery

Group Carotid Artery Peak Velocity Variation

Patients will be given a fluid maintenance rate of 1.5 ml/kg/h. To determine fluid responsiveness, the carotid artery peak velocity variation (ΔVPeak-CA) will be measured before, during, and after the procedure. If the ΔVPeak-CA goes above 15%, the patient will receive a fluid bolus of lactated ringer solution at a rate of 4-6 ml/kg over 10-15 minutes, and the team will re-measure fluid responsiveness 10 minutes after each ΔVPeaK-CA.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Carotid Artery Doppler Peak Velocity Variation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Patients will be given a fluid maintenance rate of 1.5 ml/kg/h. To determine fluid responsiveness, the carotid artery peak velocity variation (ΔVPeak-CA) will be measured before, during, and after the procedure. If the ΔVPeak-CA goes above 15%, the patient will receive a fluid bolus of lactated ringer solution at a rate of 4-6 ml/kg over 10-15 minutes, and the team will re-measure fluid responsiveness 10 minutes after each ΔVPeaK-CA.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Intraoperative fluid ratio

This ratio is calculated by dividing the sum of procedure subcutaneous infiltration and intravenous fluid by the total aspirate volume during surgery

Intervention Type OTHER

Carotid Artery Doppler Peak Velocity Variation

Patients will be given a fluid maintenance rate of 1.5 ml/kg/h. To determine fluid responsiveness, the carotid artery peak velocity variation (ΔVPeak-CA) will be measured before, during, and after the procedure. If the ΔVPeak-CA goes above 15%, the patient will receive a fluid bolus of lactated ringer solution at a rate of 4-6 ml/kg over 10-15 minutes, and the team will re-measure fluid responsiveness 10 minutes after each ΔVPeaK-CA.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Female patients between 21 and 60 years old
* Liposuction with or without abdominoplasty
* American Society of Anesthesiologists Ӏ \& ӀӀ.

Exclusion Criteria

* History of previous liposuction surgery
* American Society of Anesthesiologist III
* Coagulation disorders
* Cardiopulmonary disorders
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

TJ Plast Advanced Center for Plastic Surgery

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Sergio Soto Hopkins

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sergio Soto Hopkins, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

TJ Plast Advanced Center for Plastic Surgery

Hector Milla, M.D.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

TJ Plast Advanced Center for Plastic Surgery

Israel Espino Gaucin, M.D.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

TJ Plast Advanced Center for Plastic Surgery

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

TJ Plast out patient, S.A. de C.V.

Tijuana, Estado de Baja California, Mexico

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Mexico

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Wang G, Cao WG, Zhao TL. Fluid management in extensive liposuction: A retrospective review of 83 consecutive patients. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Oct;97(41):e12655. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012655.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30313055 (View on PubMed)

Song Y, Kwak YL, Song JW, Kim YJ, Shim JK. Respirophasic carotid artery peak velocity variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with coronary artery disease. Br J Anaesth. 2014 Jul;113(1):61-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu057. Epub 2014 Apr 9.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 24722322 (View on PubMed)

Ibarra-Estrada MA, Lopez-Pulgarin JA, Mijangos-Mendez JC, Diaz-Gomez JL, Aguirre-Avalos G. Respiratory variation in carotid peak systolic velocity predicts volume responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with septic shock: a prospective cohort study. Crit Ultrasound J. 2015 Dec;7(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s13089-015-0029-1. Epub 2015 Jun 26.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 26123610 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, and Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R-2023-02

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

CoolSculpting System
NCT04506307 COMPLETED NA
Whole Body Vibration After Bariatric Surgery
NCT05695599 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA