Muscle Energy Technique Versus Strain Counterstrain for Upper Trapezius Myofascial Pain Syndrome

NCT ID: NCT05925205

Last Updated: 2023-06-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

54 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-05-07

Study Completion Date

2024-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will be conducted to examine the superiority of effectiveness between muscle energy technique combined with physical therapy, strain counterstrain combined with physical therapy, and physical therapy alone in terms of pain intensity, pain pressure threshold, cervical lateral flexion and rotation range of motion, and neck function for patients with upper trapezius myofascial trigger points.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Myofascial pain syndrome represents a common, overlooked, and under-diagnosed disorder that have very critical negative effects on people's lives. In addition, it overloads the societies and causes several burdens on healthcare systems. However, this disorder is usually dismissed by many clinicians keeping the patients in pain for long periods. The central feature of myofascial pain syndrome is the myofascial trigger points that when managed properly, the painful symptoms disappear. Muscle energy technique and strain counterstrain immediate effects were compared in a recent comparative study for patients with upper trapezius myofascial trigger points in terms of pain intensity, pain pressure threshold, and neck mobility. The results showed that there were improvements of both techniques with no significant differences between them. Regarding the evidence of the two techniques; muscle energy technique and strain counterstrain in the management of patients with upper trapezius myofascial trigger points, there is lack of high-quality evidence investigating the effectiveness and safety of both techniques for this population and there is a need for well-developed randomized controlled trial to take a step in the pyramid of levels of evidence for the use and applicability of them. After reviewing the available literature, it was found that there is no study directly combined both techniques with physical therapy protocol in a randomized clinical trial for patients with upper trapezius myofascial trigger points; this will enable us to compare the effects of them in a controlled design to examine and find out the differences between the three treatment protocols.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Physical Therapy

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Muscle energy technique, strain counterstrain, trapezius.

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Randomized controlled trial
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators
Firstly, the research assistant, another qualified physical therapist, performing the assessment process, pre and post-treatment, will be blinded regarding the patients allocation into the three treatment groups. Secondly, the patients themselves will be blinded regarding which treatment group they will be allocated into. So the research assistant won't know the randomization results, and the main investigator won't know the assessment results which will make it a double-blinded study.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group A

Experimental group 1.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Muscle energy technique combined with the physical therapy program.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

A manual therapy technique

Group B

Experimental group 2.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Strain counterstrain technique combined with the physical therapy program

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

A manual therapy technique

Group C

Experimental group 3.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

The physical therapy program

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Electrotherapy and exercise.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Muscle energy technique combined with the physical therapy program.

A manual therapy technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Strain counterstrain technique combined with the physical therapy program

A manual therapy technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The physical therapy program

Electrotherapy and exercise.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Patients will be included in the study if they fulfil the following criteria:

1. They have active myofascial trigger points in the upper trapezius muscle bilaterally according to the established criteria for myofascial trigger points examination.
2. They have neck pain less than three months.

Exclusion Criteria

Patients will be excluded from the study if they fulfil the following criteria:

1. Patients with chronic pain syndrome.
2. Patients having myofascial trigger points in other neck muscles.
3. Patients having a history of an injury or surgery or instability or deformity including both; cervical spine and shoulder.
4. Patients diagnosed with a neurological disorder including altered sensation, migraine, cervical spondylosis, radiculopathy, or myelopathy, and tumour.
5. Patients with a systemic disease including rheumatoid arthritis, Reiter's syndrome, diabetes, fibromyalgia syndrome, and severe medical or psychiatric disorders.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mona Mohamed Ibrahim

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bassem El Nahass, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Professor of Orthopaedic Physical Therapy, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The Outpatient Clinics, Faculty of Physical Therapy Kafrelsheikh University

Kafr ash Shaykh, , Egypt

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Haytham Morsi, M.Sc.

Role: CONTACT

Phone: +201013657738

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Ibrahim Morsi, PhD

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

P.T. 2023-2025

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id